دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجائی

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات13
تعداد شماره‌ها200
تعداد مقالات2,008
تعداد مشاهده مقاله2,680,307
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله1,937,475
عفتی, فاطمه, شبیری, سید محمد, 'برزگر, حسن, رضائی, مهدیه. (1403). طراحی و اعتباریابی مدل آموزش الکترونیکی در آموزشهای شهروند محیط‌زیستی. فناوری آموزش, (), 571-590. doi: 10.22061/tej.2024.10378.3005
فاطمه عفتی; سید محمد شبیری; حسن 'برزگر; مهدیه رضائی. "طراحی و اعتباریابی مدل آموزش الکترونیکی در آموزشهای شهروند محیط‌زیستی". فناوری آموزش, , , 1403, 571-590. doi: 10.22061/tej.2024.10378.3005
عفتی, فاطمه, شبیری, سید محمد, 'برزگر, حسن, رضائی, مهدیه. (1403). 'طراحی و اعتباریابی مدل آموزش الکترونیکی در آموزشهای شهروند محیط‌زیستی', فناوری آموزش, (), pp. 571-590. doi: 10.22061/tej.2024.10378.3005
عفتی, فاطمه, شبیری, سید محمد, 'برزگر, حسن, رضائی, مهدیه. طراحی و اعتباریابی مدل آموزش الکترونیکی در آموزشهای شهروند محیط‌زیستی. فناوری آموزش, 1403; (): 571-590. doi: 10.22061/tej.2024.10378.3005

طراحی و اعتباریابی مدل آموزش الکترونیکی در آموزشهای شهروند محیط‌زیستی

فناوری آموزش
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 17 خرداد 1403    اصل مقاله (1.61 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/tej.2024.10378.3005
نویسندگان
فاطمه عفتی؛ سید محمد شبیری* ؛ حسن 'برزگر؛ مهدیه رضائی
گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
تاریخ دریافت: 21 مهر 1402،  تاریخ بازنگری: 24 آذر 1402،  تاریخ پذیرش: 17 دی 1402 
چکیده
پیشینه و اهداف: آموزش در جهت اصلاح نگرش و رفتار انسان با محیط پیرامونش، کلیـد رفـع بحران‌هـای محیط‌زیستی آینده است. این واقعیت، اجرای گسترده برنامه‌های آموزشی محیط­زیست برای شهروندان در بستر آموزش الکترونیکی را بیش از پیش ضروری ساخته است. جهت پیاده‌سازی موفق آموزش الکترونیکی، این‌گونه آموزش­ها نیاز به طراحی مدل مناسب دارد؛ از این‌رو هدف از انجام این پژوهش، طراحی و اعتباریابی مدل آموزش الکترونیکی در آموزش­های شهروند محیط­زیستی است.
روش‌ها‌: پژوهش حاضر، به لحاظ هدف، اکتشافی و از نظر ماهیت موضوعی، ‌کاربردی و توسعه‌ای و روش بررسی آن نیز، توصیفی تحلیلی است. بر این اساس، این پژوهش در دو مرحله انجام شده است. در مرحله اول، به‌منظور شناسایی مؤلفه­های لازم، از روش فراترکیب استفاده شده است و ضمن اجرای مصاحبه‌های اکتشافی نیمه‌ ساختاریافته، مجموعه­ای از پژوهش‌های مرتبط داخلی و خارجی قابل دسترس در پایگاه‌های اطلاعاتی و کتابخانه‌های دانشگاه‌ها یا مراکز دولتی مورد بهره­برداری قرار گرفته است. در عین حال، بررسی محتوایی برای استخراج کد از 150 پژوهش منتخب و نیز 22 مصاحبه انجام شده به‌صورت هدفمند و با استفاده از نرم‌افزار مکس کیودا بر اساس ملاک‌های تعیین شده انجام گرفته و برای سنجش پایایی نیز از ضریب کاپا استفاده شده است. در مرحله دوم پژوهش و به‌منظور اعتباریابی مدل، پرسش‌نامه پنج گزینه­ای مبتنی بر مقیاس لیکرت در اختیار 42 نفر از متخصصان محیط­زیست، آموزش محیط ‌زیست، آموزش الکترونیکی و آموزش شهروندی قرار داده شد و در نهایت، پس از جمع‌آوری اطلاعات، نتایج با استفاده از روش مدل‌سازی معادلات ساختاری (SEM) بارویکرد حداقل مربعات جزئی (PLS) مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفت.
یافته‌ها: در بخش کیفی پژوهش با استفاده از روش فراترکیب، 14 مؤلفه و 49 گویه­ مربوط به مدل آموزش الکترونیکی در آموزش­های شهروند محیط زیستی احصا شد. شاخص کاپا 95/0 پایایی مدل طراحی‌ شده را تأیید می‌کند که در سطح توافق عالی قرار گرفته است. یافته‌های بخش کمّی پژوهش نشان داد در این مدل، تمامی بارهای عاملی در حد بسیار مطلوب و یا در حد قابل قبول ارزیابی می‌شود. مقدار آلفای کرونباخ برای تمامی مؤلفه‌ها بالای 7/0 و مقدار پایایی ترکیبی برای کلیه متغیرهای مدل ‌بالای 6/0 به‌دست آمده است که حاکی از پایایی درونی مناسب است. همچنین، میزان متوسط واریانس استخراج ‌شده در تمامی سازه‌های مدل ‌بالاتر از 5/0 به‌دست آمده است. بر این اساس، روایی واگرای مدل نیز تأیید می‌شود. ضریب تعیین R2 برای تمامی سازه‌های مدل در حد قابل‌توجهی ارزیابی و مناسب ‌بودن برازش مدل ساختاری هم تأیید شده‌است. اندازه اثر استخراج‌ شده نیز، نشان می­دهد کیفیت سیستم (795/0=Q2) بیشترین تأثیر را بر مدل داشته است. مقادیر t در تمامی مسیرهای مدل از 96/1 بیشتر است. با توجه به نتایج به‌دست‌آمده از مدل­سازی معادلات ساختاری مبتنی بر روش حداقل مربعات جزئی، یافته­ها رابطه مثبت و معنادار مسیرهای طراحی‌شده میان مؤلفه­های مدل را تأیید می­کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
آموزش الکترونیکی؛ شهروند محیطزیستی؛ اعتباریابی؛ مولفه؛ کیفی
موضوعات
آموزش الکترونیکی- مجازی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Designing and Validating the E-Learning Model in Environmental Citizenship Training
نویسندگان [English]
F. Effati؛ S.M. Shobeiri؛ H. Barzegar؛ M. Rezaee
Department of Environmental Education, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Background and Objectives: Education and improvement of human behavior with their surroundings, is the key to solving environmental crises. This shows the necessity of implementing environmental education programs on a large scale through electronic learning for citizens. In order to successfully implement e-learning, it is necessary to design a suitable model; therefore, the purpose of this research was to design and validate the model of e-learning in environmental-citizenship training.
Methods: This study was conducted with the aim of designing and validating the e-learning model in environmental citizenship training. This study was exploratory in terms of thematic nature and applied and developmental in terms of objective. This study was carried out in two phases; in the first phase, which was done with the meta-synthesis method, related domestic and foreign research available in the databases and libraries of universities or government centers were investigated and semi- structural exploratory interviews were used. According to the inclusion criteria, the content review was done on 150 researches, and 22 experts were selected to be interviewed in a purposive way using MAXQDA. The kappa coefficient (or Cohen's kappa) was used to measure reliability as well. In the second phase of the research, the validation of the model was done using a 5-point Likert scale survey, which was given to 42 experts in education, environment, electronic education, citizenship education, and in the second step, after collecting information, the data were analyzed using the method of Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with the Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach.
Findings: Using the meta-synthesis method in the qualitative part of the research, 14 components and 49 items related to the EEC model of the environmental citizen were extracted. Cohen's kappa coefficient confirmed 0.95 reliability of the designed model, which was at the level of excellent agreement. According to the findings of the quantitative part of the research, all factor loadings in this model were evaluated as very favorable or acceptable. The value of Cronbach's alpha for all components was above 0.7 and the combined reliability value for all variables of the model was above 0.6, which indicated good internal reliability. The average amount of extracted variance in all of the model structures was above 0.5; therefore, the divergent validity of the model was also confirmed. The coefficient of determination R2 for all of the model structures was evaluated as significant, and the appropriateness of the fit of the structural model was confirmed. The extracted effect size also showed that the quality of the system (Q2=0.795) had the greatest impact on the model. The values of t in all paths of the model were greater than 1.96. According to the results obtained from the modeling of structural equations based on the partial least squares method, there was a positive and significant relationship in the designed paths between the components of the model.
Conclusion: The items and components introduced in the design of the proposed model were also approved by experts. The designed model can be effective as a management tool in strengthening the provision of useful training and improving educational performance in this field. Also, the development of such models can help the decision makers as a guide to improve the education process to adopt a suitable policy for investing effective factors in the adoption and development of this educational approach.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
E-learning, Environmental Citizenship, Validating, Component, Qualitative
مراجع
[1] Hadjichambis, A. C., & Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D. Education for environmental citizenship: The pedagogical approach. In Springer Cham, Switzerland. 2020 ; 4: 237-261.

[2] Priadi, A., Fatria, E., Sarkawi, D., & Oktaviani, A. Environmental citizenship behavior (the effect of environmental sensitivity, knowledge of ecology, personal investment in environmental issue, locus of control towards students’ environmental citizenship behavior). In E3S Web of Conferences.2018, December 74; 74(4):08002.

[3] Brusseau, M. L., Ramirez-Andreotta, M., Pepper, I. L., & Maximillian, J. Environmental impacts on human health and well-being. In Environmental and pollution science . Academic Press, 2019: 477-499.

[4] Díaz-L´opez, C., J´odar, J., Verichev, K., Rodríguez, M.L., Carpio, M., Zamorano, M., Dynamics of changes in climate zones and building energy demand. A case study in Spain., Appl. Sci. 2021; 11(9): 4261.

[5] United Nations, Transforming Our World. 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, 2015.

[6] Hadjichambis, A.C.; Reis, P. Introduction to the Conceptualisation of Environmental Citizenship for Twenty-First-Century Education. In Conceptualizing Environmental Citizenship for 21st Century Education; Springer Nature: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; 4:1-14.

[7] Nadakavukaren, A., & Caravanos, J.  Our global environment: A health perspective. Waveland Press.8th edition, 2020.

[8] D’Arco, M.; Marino, V. Environmental Citizenship Behavior and Sustainability Apps: An Empirical Investigation. Transform. Gov. People Process Policy ,2020;16:185-202.

https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/TG-07-2021-0118/full/pdf?title=environmental-citizenship-behavior-and-sustainability-apps-an-empirical-investigation

[9]. Hungerford, H.R., & Volk, T.L. Changing Learner Behavior through Environmental Education. Journal of Environmental Education.1990; 21: 8-21.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00958964.1990.10753743

[10] Dobson, A. Environmental citizenship: towards sustainable development. Sustainable development.2007, 15(5):276-285.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/sd.344

[11] Georgiou, Y., Hadjichambis, A. C., & Hadjichambi, D. Teachers’ perceptions on environmental citizenship: A systematic review of the literature. Sustainability. 2021; 13(5): 2622.

[12] Vasiliades, M.A.; Hadjichambis, A.C.; Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D.; Adamou, A.; Georgiou, Y. A Systematic Literature Review on the Participation Aspects of Environmental and Nature-Based Citizen Science Initiatives. Sustainability. 2021; 13: 7457.

[13] Hadjichambis, A.C.; Paraskeva-Hadjichambi, D.; Sinakou, E.; Adamou, A.; Georgiou, Y. Green Cities for Environmental Citizenship: A Systematic Literature Review of Empirical Research from 31 Green Cities of the World. Sustainability. 2022; 14: 16223.

[14] Berkowitz, A. R., Ford, M. E., & Brewer, C.A. A framework for integrating ecological literacy, civics literacy, and environmental citizenship in environmental education in etc.. Environmental Education and Advocacy: Changing Perspectives of Ecology and Education.2005;11:227-266.

[15] Khan, M.A., Vivek., Nabi,M.K., Khojah, M., Tahir,M. Students’ Perception towards E-Learning during COVID-19Pandemic in India: An Empirical Study, Sustainability.2021; 13(1):57.

[16] Saeed Al-Maroof, R., Alhumaid, K., Salloum, S. The Continuous Intention to Use E-Learning, from TwoDifferent Perspectives, Educ. Sci. 2021; 11(1): 6.

[17] Abbas, A. D., Mustafa, A. S., Fayyad, Y. S., & Hamdi, M. M. E-Learning During Covid-19: Towards AlMaarif University College. Journal of AlMaarif University College. 2020; 31(1):370-375.

[18] Akbari, S.; Suleimanpour Omran, m. [Investigating the Effect of Water Consumption Behavior, Environmental Citizen Behavior and Relationship with Nature on Adult Education], Journal of Water and Sustainable Development. 2019; (3) 7: 25-36.[In Persian].

[19] Goldman, D., Ralph Hansmann, R., Činčera, J., Radović, V., Telešienė, A ., Balžekienė,A., and Vávra, J. Education for Environmental Citizenship and Responsible Environmental Behaviour, IN The Author(s) A. Ch. Hadjichambis et al. (eds.), Conceptualizing Environmental Citizenship for 21st Century Education, Environmental Discourses in Science Education 4. 2020.

[20] Vaziri AghdAM, Z.; Maki Al-Agha, B.; Etamad Ahri, A. [Curriculum design based on sustainable development, professional development and citizenship education and its validation from the perspective of experts]. Quarterly Journal of Research in Educational Systems.2019; (49) 14: 111-124.[In Persian]

[21] Salimi, J. [Studying how "citizenship education" in the curriculum: a research synthesis of the studies conducted in the last two decades], Curriculum Research Journal. 2018; (2)9: 255-287.[In Persian].

[22] Hosseini Mehr, A.; Saif Naraghi, M.; Naderi, A.; Shariatmadari, A. [Citizenship skills needed by students in middle school curriculum]. Quarterly of  Educational Leadership and Management . 2011; 5(4): 45-65. [In Persian].

[23] Zareh, B.,  Niazi Komleh, A., Habibpour, K., Karmi, N. [Meta-analysis of factors affecting environmental behaviors among citizens], Iranian Journal of Social Issues. 2019’ 11 (1): 281- 298. [In Persian].

[24] Kolahi, M.; Entegham Kesh, N.; Mollaei Kermani, B. [The role of socio-cultural components on citizens' environmental behavior, case study: Shirvan]. Urban Ecology Research. 2018; 10(20:) 41-56.[In Persian].

[25] Salloum, S. A., Al-Emran, M., Shaalan, K., & Tarhini, A. [Factors affecting the E-learning acceptance: A case study from UAE]. Education and Information Technologies. 2019; 24(1): 509-530..

[26] Keshavarz, M.; Damghanian, H.; Ebrahimi, A.; Rostgar, A. [Examining the role of identity, environmental attitudes and green psychological climate in creating environmental citizenship behavior]. Studies of Environmental Sciences. 2019; 5 (10): 2597-2607. [In Persian].

[27] Kashima, Y., Paladino, A., & Margetts, E. A. Environmentalist identity and environmental striving. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2017; 38: 64-75.

[28] Nikolić V., Petković D., Denić N., Milovančević M., Gavrilović S. Appraisal and review of e-learning and ICT systems in teaching process. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications. 2019; 1(64):456 -513.

[29] Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning, 4th Edition, ISBN: 978-1-119-15866. 2016: 528.

[30] Kock, N., Hadaya, P.  Minimum sample size estimation in PLS-SEM: The inverse square root and gamma-exponential methods. Information Systems Journal. 2018; 28(1): 227–261.s://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.12131

[31] Golamzadeh, R., Azar, A. [Structure equation modeling: Partial Least Squares (PLS-SEM)]. F Hare, J (Author). Tehran, Publisher:Negah Danesh. 2015.

[32] Davis, F. D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989;13(3):319-339.

[33] DeLone, W.H. and McLean, E.R. “The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update”, Journal of Management Information Systems. Routledge.2004; 19(4): 9-30.  

[34] Khan, B. H. The People Process Product Continuum in E-Learning: The E- Learning P3 Model. Educational Technology. 2004; 44(5): 33-40.

[35] Sadeghitabar, p., Shariatmadari, M. [Designing and Validating the Continuing Medical Education Model Based on Blended Learning], Quarterly Journal of Research in School and Virtual Learning. 2020; 8(1): 79-97.[In persian]

[36]. AbuSneineh, W. Zairi., M. An evaluation framework for E-learning effectiveness in the Arab World. International Encyclopedia of Education (Third Edition). 2010: 521-535.

[37] Zarif Sanai N; Farajullahi, M. [Presenting a conceptual model for distance learning in higher education], Iranian Higher Education Association,2011; 4(1): 159-129.[In persian].

[38] Jahanara, A., Sarmadi, M.R., Esmaili, Z., Zarabian,F . [Design and Validation of a Project-Based Distance Learning Model With an Emphasis on Constructivist Approach], Journal of Research in Teaching. 2019; 6(4):86-105,[In persian].

[39] Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. Cultural impacts on e-learning systems' success. The Internet and Higher Education. 2016; 31: 58-70.

[40] Williams, P. E. Roles and competencies for distance education programs in higher education institutions. The American Journal of Distance Education. 2003;17(1): 45-57

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1701_4

[41] Darabi, A. A., Sikorski, E. G., & Harvey, R. B. Validated competencies for distance teaching. Distance Education. 2006; 27(1): 105-122.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01587910600654809

[42] Martin, F., Budhrani, K., Kumar, S., & Ritzhaupt, A. Award-winning faculty online teaching practices: Roles and competencies. Online Learning. 2019; 23(1):184-205.

[43] Ho, S. Y., Chen, W. T., & Hsu, W. L. Assessment system for junior high schools in Taiwan to select environmental education facilities and sites. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education. 2017; 13(5): 1485-1499.

[44] Amini, M; Sattari, S; Rastgo, A. [Design and validation of the feasibility model of humor-based education in elementary schools], Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership &Administration, 2021; 15(4) : 217-238.[In persian].

[45] Ghorbankhani, M., & Salehi, K. [Representation the characteristics of the successful Professors in the virtual education in Iran’s higher education system from the viewpoint of students and professors, a phenomenological study]. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ).2017; 11(3): 235-255.[In persian].

[46] Eraqi .M., Abou-Alam, W., Belal, M & Fahmi, T.Attitudes of Undergraduate Students Toward E-Learning in Tourism: The Case of Egypt, Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism. 2011; 11(4): 325-348.

[47] Placklé I, Könings KD, Jacquet W, Struyven K, Libotton A, van Merriënboer JJ, et al. Students’ preferred characteristics of learning environments in vocational secondary education. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET).2014;1(2):107-124

[48] Sodagar H R, Soleimanpour Omran M, [Masoumian F. Providing an e-learning operational model in the field of environment], Journal of Educational Studies Aja University of Medical Science, 2021; 18: 39-50, [In Persian].

[49] Mayer, R. E. Thirty years of research on online learning. Applied Cognitive Psychology,2019; 33(2): 152-159.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/acp.3482

[50] Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. Engagement matters: Student perceptions on the importance of engagement strategies in the online learning environment. Online learning, 2018; 22(1):205-222.

[51] Ramezani Ardi, E., Zaraii Zavaraki, E., Mohammadreza Nili, M.R., Aliabadi, KH. [Designing and Validating the E-Learning Model in in-Service Training], Quarterly Journal of Environmental Education and Sustainable Development,2019; 7(2): 129-142. [In persian]

[53] Yim, J. S.-C., Moses, P., & Azalea, A. Predicting teachers’ continuance in a virtual learning environment with psychological ownership and the TAM: A perspective from Malaysia. Educational Technology Research and Development,2019; 67(3): 691-709

[54] Smederevac-Lalic, M., Finger, D., Kovách, I., Lenhardt, M., Petrovic, J., Djikanovic, V., . . . Boeve-de Pauw, J. Knowledge and environmental citizenship. Conceptualizing environmental citizenship for 21st century education. 2020:  69-82.

[55] Shafaii Moghaddam, E. [Investigating the Mediating Role of Responsibility in the Relationship between Altruistic Value and Environmental Citizenship Behavior], Journal of environment and transsectoral development, 2022; 76(7):45-60. [In persian]

[56] Bell, D. Environmental citizenship: De-politicizing or re-politicizing environmental politics? In Routledge handbook of global environmental politics, 2022: 389-401: Routledge.

[57] Huttunen, J., & Albrecht, E. The framing of environmental citizenship and youth participation in the Fridays for Future Movement in Finland. International Journal of Geography,2021; 199(1).

[58] El-Sabagh, H. A. Adaptive e-learning environment based on learning styles and its impact on development students' engagement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 2021; 18(1): 1-24.

[59] Shamsuddin, N., & Kaur, J. Students' Learning Style and Its Effect on Blended Learning, Does It Matter? International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education. 2020; 9(1): 195-202.

[60] Fermín-González, M. Research on virtual education, inclusion, and diversity: A systematic review of scientific publications (2007–2017). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. 2019; 20(5): 146-167.

[61] Li, Y., Zhu, J., & Fu, W. Intelligent privacy protection of end user in long distance education. Mobile Networks and Applications, 2022; 27(3): 1162-1173.

[62] Abraham, A., Dutta, P., Mandal, J. K., Bhattacharya, A., & Dutta, S. Emerging technologies in data mining and information security. Proceedings of IEMIS-2018. vol 3. [Accessed 8th July 2020].

[63] Al-Fraihat, D., Joy, M., & Sinclair, J. Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior. 2020; 102: 67-86.

[64]. Soffer T, Kahan T. Livne E. e-assessment of online academi courses via students' activities and perceptions. Studies in Educational Evaluation. 2017; 54: 83-93.

[65] Insha, A ., Anish, Y., Sandeep, W., Makhmoor, B., What Shapes E-Learning Effectiveness among Tourism Education

Students? An Empirical Assessment during COVID19, Journal of Hospitality, Leisure, Sport & Tourism Education. 2021; 30(6):100337

[67] Fathema, N.; Shannon, D.; Ross, M. Expanding the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Examine Faculty Use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) In Higher Education Institutions. J. Online Learn. Teach. 2015; 11: 210–232.

[68] Mlekus, L.; Bentler, D.; Paruzel, A.; Kato-Beiderwieden, A.L.; Maier, G.W. How to raise technology acceptance: user experience characteristics as technology-inherent determinants. Gr. Interaktion. Organ. Z. Angew. Organ. 2020; 51: 273–283.

[69] Salimon, M. G., Sanuri, S. M. M., Aliyu, O. A., Perumal, S., & Yusr, M. M. E-learning satisfaction and retention: A concurrent perspective of cognitive absorption, perceived social presence and technology acceptance model. Journal of Systems and Information Technology,2021; 23(1): 109-129.

[70] McBrien, J. L., Jones, P., and Cheng,R . Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous onlineclassroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning, Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 2009; 10(3):1–17.

[71] Nieuwoudt J. E. Investigating synchronous and asynchronous class attendance as predictors of academic success in online education, Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 2020; 36(3) :15–25.

[72] Northey, G.,. Bucic, T., Chylinski, M., and. Govind, R . Increasing Student EngagementUsing Asynchronous Learning, J. Mark. Educ. 2015; 37(3):171–180.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0273475315589814

[73] Hadullo, K., Oboko, R., & Omwenga, E. Factors affecting asynchronous e-learning qualit in developing countries, A Qualitative Pre-Study of JKUAT University.university settings. International journal of education and development using information and communication technology. 2018; 14(1).

[74] Almaiah, M. A., & Alyoussef, I. Y. Analysis of the effect of course design, course content support, course assessment and instructor characteristics on the actual use of E-learning system. Ieee Access. 2019; 7: 171907-171922.

[75] Bagheri Majed, R; Sedghi Bukani, N .[Designing a preparation model for e-learning in the educational system of Islamic Azad University of Mahabad], Information and Communication Technology Quarterly in Educational Sciences, 2016; 7(4): 172-149.[In persian].

[76] Saekow, A., & Samson, D. E-learning readiness of Thailand's universities comparing to the USA's cases. International Journal of E-Education, E-Business, E-Management and e-Learning. 2011; 1(2): 126-131.

[77] Hassanzadeh, A., Kanaani, F., & Elahi, S. A model for measuring e-learning systems success in universities. Expert Systems with Applications. 2012; 39(12): 10959–10966.

[78] Selim, H. M. . Critical success factors for e- learning acceptance: Confirmatory factor models Computers and Education, Computers & Education, 2007: 41-396.

[79] Annamali, D., & Ramayah, T. Sense of belonging and grit in e-learning portal usage in higher education. Interactive Learning Environments. 2021: 1-15.

[80] Barakpur, N. and Jahanseir, F. [Environmental Citizenship and Analysis of Citizenship Behavior in Qazvin City], Hoviate shahr. 2017; 10(28): 53-66.[In persian].

[81] Arafat, S., Aljohani, N., Abbasi, R., Hussain, A., & Lytras, M. Connections between e-learning, web science, cognitive computation and social sensing, and their relevance to learning analytics: A preliminary study. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018; 92: 478-486.

[82] Steg, L., & De Groot, J. I. Environmental values. The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology. Chapter: 5, Oxford University Press Editors: S. Clayton. 2012:81-92

[83] Chen, M.F. An examination of the Value‐Belief‐Norm theory model in predicting pro‐environmental behaviour in

Taiwan: The value-belief-norm (VBN) theory model in predicting pro-environmental behaviour Asian Journal of Social Psychology. 2015; 18 (2): 145-151.

[84] Hejazi, Y., Karami Darabkhani R., Hoseyni, M. and Rezaei, A. [Investigating the effective factors on environmental behavior of environmental NGOs members in Tehran Province], Journal of Environmental Studies. 2017; 43(1): 17-30. [In persian].

[85] Robelia, B., & Murphy, T. What do people know about key environmental issues? A review of environmental knowledge surveys. Environmental Education Research. 2012; 18(3): 299-321.

[86] Zsóka, Á., Szerényi, Z. M., Széchy, A., & Kocsis, T. Greening due to environmental education? Environmental knowledge, attitudes, consumer behavior and everyday pro-environmental activities of Hungarian high school and university students. Journal of cleaner production. 2013; 48:126-138.

[87] Rajapaksa, D., Islam, M., & Managi, S. Pro-environmental behavior: The role of public perception in infrastructure and the social factors for sustainable development. Sustainability.2018; 10(4): 937;

[88] Mercadal, T.. Instructional design. Research Starters: Education. Accession Number:2015; 108690536

[89] Gwet, K.L. Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters. Advanced Analytics LLC.2012. [Accessed 19th April 2021]

[90] Taghi Yare, F & Siadati, M. [Criteria for selecting content authoring tools in e-learning]. Research and Planning in Higher Education. 2016; 43: 75-89.[In persian]

[91] Tabasi,S.Z., Seyyedi Nazarlo, S.T. [Interaction in e-learning environment]. Rahavardnoor Quarterly. 2011;10(36):14-23. [In Persian].

[92] Abbasi Kasani H, Shams Mourkani Gh. [A research synthesis of critical success factors of e-learning: A model development]. Tech. Edu. J. 2019; 13(1): 25-39.[In persian].

[93] Boelens, R., Voet, M., & De Wever, B. The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: In-structors views and use of differentiated in-struction in blended learning. Computers & Education. 2018; 120: 197-212

[94] Alipour N, Noroozi D, Nourian M, [Designing a model of components affecting the quality of e-learning environments]. Tech. Edu. J. 2021; 15(3): 503-518.[In persian].

[95] Yuriev, A., Dahmen, M., Paillé, P., Boiral, O., & Guillaumie, L. Pro-environmental behaviors through the lens of the theory of planned behavior: A scoping review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2020; 155: 104660.

[96] Rezaghi, M., M.; Hedayati, Kh., Qasimzadeh Alishahi, A., Shahbazi, R. [Examining the role of students' attitudes, system quality and knowledge management in the behavior of using e-learning with the mediation of e-learning acceptance], Journal of Information Management Sciences and Techniques, 2023; 9(1):17-44.[In persian].

[97]. Rashidi, H., Mohddin, M. [Presenting a model for accepting electronic education system in Qazvin University of Medical Sciences]. Technology Growth Quarterly. 2019; 16(64): 70-62.[In persian].

[98] Ghalian, Sh., Zalpour, A. [Identification of success factors of e-learning studied: Physical education students of Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz].Journal of Jundishapur Education Development .2018;10(2): 143-135.[In persian].

[99] Marshall S. Improving the quality of e-learning: Lessons from the eMM. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2012; 28(1): 65-78.

[100] Lin HF. Measuring online learning systems success: Applying the updated DeLone and McLean model. Cyberpsychology & Behavior. 2007; 10(6): 817-820.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 64
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 39


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب