دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجائی

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات13
تعداد شماره‌ها200
تعداد مقالات2,008
تعداد مشاهده مقاله2,679,647
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله1,936,958
یوسفی, مریم, عصاره, علیرضا, حسینی‌خواه, علی. (1398). کندوکاو و تبیین منطق برنامه درسی مبتنی بر پروژه. فناوری آموزش, 13(3), 565-580. doi: 10.22061/jte.2018.3704.1924
مریم یوسفی; علیرضا عصاره; علی حسینی‌خواه. "کندوکاو و تبیین منطق برنامه درسی مبتنی بر پروژه". فناوری آموزش, 13, 3, 1398, 565-580. doi: 10.22061/jte.2018.3704.1924
یوسفی, مریم, عصاره, علیرضا, حسینی‌خواه, علی. (1398). 'کندوکاو و تبیین منطق برنامه درسی مبتنی بر پروژه', فناوری آموزش, 13(3), pp. 565-580. doi: 10.22061/jte.2018.3704.1924
یوسفی, مریم, عصاره, علیرضا, حسینی‌خواه, علی. کندوکاو و تبیین منطق برنامه درسی مبتنی بر پروژه. فناوری آموزش, 1398; 13(3): 565-580. doi: 10.22061/jte.2018.3704.1924

کندوکاو و تبیین منطق برنامه درسی مبتنی بر پروژه

فناوری آموزش
مقاله 7، دوره 13، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 51، تیر 1398، صفحه 565-580    اصل مقاله (961.31 K)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/jte.2018.3704.1924
نویسندگان
مریم یوسفی1؛ علیرضا عصاره* 2؛ علی حسینی‌خواه3
1واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجایی، تهران، ایران
3گروه مطالعات برنامه درسی، دانشگاه خوارزمی، تهران، ایران
تاریخ دریافت: 19 خرداد 1397،  تاریخ بازنگری: 10 آذر 1397،  تاریخ پذیرش: 14 آذر 1397 
چکیده
پیشینه و اهداف: با تأمل در جوامع گوناگون و باوجود ادعای پیشرفت در زمینه‌های آموزشی، فنّاوری، اجتماعی و ...، بازهم مشکلات عدیده‌ای در ارتباطات انسانی، روابط مدنی و ناکارآمدی افراد به چشم می‌خورد. با این توضیح این سؤال مطرح می‌شود که آیا پیشرفت‌های مختلف در عمل نتوانسته مورداستفاده قرار گیرد؟ توسعه آموزش و فنّاوری با منافع عمومی و واقعی انسان‌ها هم‌سو نبوده است؟ آموزش با نیازهای جامعه تطبیق داده نشده است؟ پیشرفت‌های مختلف زمینه عملیاتی پیدا نکرده است؟ و شاید سؤالات بسیار دیگری که می‌توان در این مورد مطرح کرد؛ اما باکمی دقت می‌توان دریافت که هرکدام از این عوامل ریشه در یک علت عمده دارد و آن‌هم نوع آموزش و اهداف آموزشی است. اعتراض گسترده نظریه‌پردازان آموزشی این است که فراگیران در نظام‌های سنتی با شیوه انتقال عناوین درسی، به‌ندرت فرصت می‌یابند که چیزی را به‌طور عمیق بیاموزند. این در حالی است که در عصر کنونی باید تلاش شود که شالوده مهارت‌های فکری کودکان را در همان سال‌های اولیه کودکی پایه‌ریزی کرد و شخصیت آن‌ها را به‌گونه‌ای شکل داد تا بتوانند با نگرشی باز، مستقل و انتخاب‌گر به آینده خود بنگرند. به این منظور باید از همه پتانسیل‌ها و امکانات موجود نظیر معلم، دانش‌آموز، والدین، همسالان، محیط یادگیری و اجتماع که در پیرامون مدرسه هستند، بهره گرفته شود تا بتوان تا جای ممکن شاخص‌های موردنظر را تأمین نمود. هدف مقاله، کندوکاو و تبیین منطق برنامه‌ درسی مبتنی بر پروژه هست. در این نوشتار، منطق یادگیری مبتنی بر پروژه از جنبه‌های مختلف موردبررسی قرار گرفت.
روش ها: ‌با توجه به هدف اصلی پژوهش و عنایت به این‌که منطق بر اساس مبانی، اصول و رسالت‌های آن تعریف می‌شود، پرسش‌های پنج‌گانه پژوهش مبنی بر چگونگی مبانی فلسفی، روان‌شناختی و اجتماعی یادگیری مبتنی بر پروژه، رسالت و اصول این یادگیری موردبررسی قرار گرفت. برای دستیابی به تحلیل و تبیین فوق از روش سنتز پژوهی استفاده شد که در آن پژوهش‌های مرتبط با یادگیری مبتنی بر پروژه با روشی نظام‌مند انتخاب، واکاوی محتوایی و دسته‌بندی شدند. در مرحله بعد 101 پژوهش که معیارهای موردنظر را داشتند انتخاب شدند، سپس ترکیبی از یافته‌های آنان طبق اصول تلفیق، بازاندیشی و بازآرایی داده‌ها، ارائه‌شده است.
یافته‌ها: محقق به‌وسیله یافته‌های این پژوهش و با مشخص نمودن مبانی فلسفی، روان‌شناختی و اجتماعی یادگیری مبتنی بر پروژه و ترسیم رسالت و اصول این نوع یادگیری تلاش کرد تا منطق برنامه‌ درسی مبتنی بر پروژه را تحلیل و تبیین نماید.
نتیجه‌گیری: مطالعه پژوهش‌های پیشین مشخص کرده که مطالعه مستقیمی مرتبط با یادگیری مبتنی بر پروژه در قالب یک برنامه‌ درسی انجام نشده است. بیشتر پژوهش‌های مبتنی بر پروژه مربوط به شاخه‌های کشاورزی، دانشکده‌های معماری و یا مدیریت پروژه بوده است. اگر هم در موارد معدودی در آموزش رسمی مورد توجه واقع شده، بیشتر به عنوان یک روش تدریس مورد مطالعه قرار گرفته است و تنها به یک عنصر پرداخته نه این که کل برنامه درسی را مورد مطالعه و بررسی قرار دهد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
پروژه؛ برنامه درسی؛ منطق برنامه درسی؛ سازنده گرایی؛ برنامه درسی مبتنی بر پروژه
موضوعات
برنامه ریزی درسی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Exploration and Explanation of the Rationale of Project-Based Curriculum
نویسندگان [English]
M. Yousefi1؛ A. Assareh2؛ A. Hoseini Khah3
1Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2Department of Educational Science, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University Tehran, Iran
3Department of Educational Science, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Background and Objective:Reflecting on different societies and despite the claim of progress in the fields of education, technology, society, etc., there are still many problems in human relations, civil relations and inefficiency of individuals. With this explanation, the question arises as to whether various advances have not been able to be used in practice. Has the development of education and technology not been in the public and real interests of human beings? Is education not adapted to the needs of society? Have various developments not found operational ground? And perhaps there are many other questions that can be asked about this. But with a little care it can be seen that each of these factors is rooted in a major cause, and that is the type of education and educational goals. The widespread objection of educational theorists is that learners in traditional systems seldom have the opportunity to learn something in-depth through the transfer of subject matter. At the present time, however, efforts should be made to lay the foundation for children's intellectual skills in the very early years of childhood and to shape their personalities so that they can look to their future with an open, independent and selective attitude. To this end, all available potentials and facilities such as teachers, students, parents, peers, learning environment and community around the school should be used to provide the desired indicators as much as possible.
The goal of this article is about explain and analysis of project based curriculum. This study has considered rationale of project based learning in different aspects.
Methods: In attention to the main goal of research and also rational of curriculum that is defined based on its basics, principles, and messages, so the fivefold questions of research include how defined the philosophical, psychological, and social basics of project based learning and the same time it considered its message and principles. In order to reach to analyze and explain of above aim applied research syntheses in which selected, contextualized, and categorized researches related to project based learning with a regular method. In the next step selected 101 researches which had objective criteria, then based on syntheses principles, rethinking, data rearrangement presented combination of their findings.
Findings:Researcher with the help of research and with identifying of philosophical, psychological, and social basics of project based learning and drawing of message and principles of this kind of learning tried to analysis and explain rationale of project based curriculum.
Conclusion: A study of previous research has shown that a direct study of project-based learning has not been conducted in the form of a curriculum. Most project-based research has been in the fields of agriculture, architecture, or project management. Although it has been considered in a few cases in formal education, it has been studied more as a teaching method and has dealt with only one element and not the whole curriculum

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
project, Curriculum, rational curriculum, constructionism, project based curriculum
مراجع

[1] Pyke Norman. Ablest ’being hindered’. Time Educational Supplement; 1993.

[2] Maleki H. 2009. Curriculum (action guide) (2nd Ed). Tehran: Madreseh; 2009. Persian.

[3] Mehrmohammadi M.  Curriculum: Theories , Approaches and Perspectives (3nd Ed). Tehran: Samt; 2009. Persian.

[4] Bruner J. The process of education. MA: Harvard University Press; 1977.

[5] Fathi Vajargah K. Priciples and Concepts of curriculum. Tehran: Baal; 2009. Persian.

[6] Naghibzadeh A. A look at the philosophy of education (6nd Ed).Tehran: Tahoori; 1995. Persian.

[7] David J. What Research Says About … / Project-Based Learning. Teaching Students to Think. 2008; 65(5): 80-82.

[8] Kilpatrick WH. The Project Method: The Use of the Purposeful Act in the Educative Process. Published by: Teachers College, Colombia University. Eleventh Impression; 1929.

[9] Akker D. Curriculum design research. Proceedings of the seminarconducted at the eastChina Normal University, Shanghai (RR China) (pp. 23-26); 2007.

[10] Fernandes S, Gonsalves, R. Preparing graduates for professional practice: Findings from a case study of Project-based Learning (PBL). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014;139: 219 – 226.

[11] Koutrouba, Konstantina, & Karageorgou, Elissavet. Cognitive and socio-affective outcomes of project-based learning: Perceptions of Greek Second Chance School students. Improving Schools. 2012; 16(3): 244-260.

[12] Kaldi, Stanroula. Filippatou, Diamanto. & Govaris, Christos. Project-based learning in primary Schools: effects on pupils' learning and attitudes Education 3-13. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education. 2011; 39(1): 35-47.

[13] Chan L, Lih J. Technology integration applied to project-based learning in science. Innovat Educ Teach Int. 2008; 45(1): 55-56.

[14] Ciftci S. The Effects of Using Project-Based Learning in Social Studies Education to Students' Attitudes towards Social Studies Courses. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 186: 1019 – 1024

[15] Dauletova V. Expanding Omani Learners’ Horizons through Project Based Learning: A Case Study.Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. 2014; 77(2): 183– 203.

[16] Bas G, Beyhan O. Effects of multiple intelligences supported Project based learning on students’ achievement levels and attitudes towards English lesson. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education. 2010; 2(3): 365-386.

[17] Rhodes C, Garrick J. Project-based Learning and the limits of corporate knowledg. Journal of Management Education. 2003; 27(4): 447-471.

[18] Kettanun C. Project-based Learning and Its Validity in a Thai EFL Classroom. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 192: 567 – 573.

[19] Sultana M, Zaki S. Proposing Project Based Learning as an Alternative to traditional ELT pedagogy at public colleges in Pakistan. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies. 2015; 4(2): 155-173.

[20] Shafaei A, Abdol Rahim H. Does project-based learning enhance Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary recall and retention? Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research. 2015; 3(2): 83-99.  Persian.

[21] Musa F, Mufti N, Abdul Latiff R, Mohamed Amin M. Project Based learning (PjBL): inculcating soft skills in 21st century workplace. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2011; 59: 565 – 573.

[22] Bagheri M, Wan A, Wan Z, Abdullah MC, Mohd DS. Project-Based learning as a facilitator to promote students’ technology competencies. World Journal on Educational Technology. 2013; 5: 207-214.

[23] Kai Wah Chu S, Tse SK, Chow K. Using collaborative teaching and inquiry project-based learning to help primary school students develop information literacy and information skills. Library & Information Science Research. 2011; 33: 132–143.

[24] Butler A, Christofili M. Project-Based Learning Communities in Developmental Education: A Case Study of Lessons Learned. Community College Journal of Research and Practice. 2014; 38:638–650

[25] Ergül R, Elif KK. The Effect of Project Based Learning on Students’ Science Success. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 136: 537 – 541.

[26] Dauletova V. Expanding Omani Learners’ Horizons through Project Based Learning: A Case Study. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly. 2014; 77(2): 183– 203.

[27] Filippatou D, Kaldi S. The effectiveness of Project-Based Learning on Pupils with Learning Difficultis Regarding Academic Performance. Group Work and Motivation; 2010

[28] Van R, Shahron W. Scaffolding project-based learning with the project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK). Computers & Education. 2009; 52: 210–219.

[29] Stappenbelt B, Rowles C. Project based learning in the first year engineering curriculum. 20th Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (AAEE 2009), 411-416. Adelaide, Australia: University of Adelaide; 2009.

[30] Wurdinger S, Haar J, Hugg R. A qualitative study using Project-based learning in a mainstream middle school Minnesota State University. Improving Schools. 2007; 10(2): 2,150–161.

[31] Fernandes M, Augusto C.Project-Based Learning laboratory for teaching embedded systems. Mathematical Problems in Engineering. 2015; 236749

[32] Fragoulis L, Tsiplakides L. Project-Based Learning in the Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Greek Primary Schools: From Theory to Practice. English Language Teaching. 2009; 2(3): 113-119

[33] Karaman S, Celik S. An exploratory study on the perspectives of prospective computer teachers following project-based learning. Int J Technol Des Educ. 2008; 18: 203–215.

[34] Chartier B, Gibson B. Project-Based Learning: A Search and Rescue UAV–Perceptions of an Undergraduate Engineering Design Team: A Preliminary Study. Proceedings of the 2007 AaeE Conference, Melbourne; 2007.

[35] Scarbrough H, Swan J, Laurent S, Bresnen M, Edelman L, Newell S. Project-Based Learning and the Role of Learning Boundaries.Organization Studies. 2004; 25(9): 1579–1600.

[36] Fardanesh H, Nouri A. Instructional Design, Based on a Project-based learning model: Construction-oriented approach to educational design. Journal of Psychology and Educational Sciences. 2010; 40(1): 101-121. Persian.

[37] Pelech J. (2008). Delivering Constructivism through Project Based Learning. Institute for Learning Centered Education.

[38] Lasauskiene J, Rauduvaite A. Project-Based Learning at University: Teaching Experiences of Lecturers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 197: 788 – 792.

[39] Shi Jer L, Chang CC, Dzan WY, Shih RC (2012). Construction of A Creative Instructional Design Model Using Blended, Project-Based Learning for College Students. Creative Education. 2012; 3(7): 1281-1290

[40] Hou HT. (2010). Exploring the behavioral patterns in project-based learning with online discussion: quantitative content analysis and progressive sequential analysis. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2010; 9(3): 52-60.

[41] Altun Yalcin S, Turgut U, Buyukkasap E. The Effect of Project Based Learning on Science Undergraduates’ Learning of Electricity, Attitude towards Physics and Scientific Process Skills.  International Online Journal of Educational Sciences. 2009; 1(1), 81-105.

[42] Achilles, Cillvia. Hoover, Stephan. Exploring Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in Grades 6-12. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid South Educational Research Association; 1996.

[43] Milentijevic I, Ciric V, Vojinovic O. Version control in project based learning. Computers & Education. 2008; 50: 1331–1338.

[44] Ayas K, Zeniuk N. Project-based learning: Building communities of Reflecthve practitioners. Management Learning; 32(1), 61-76.

[45] Hertzog N. Impediments to a Project-Based and Integrated Curriculum: A Qualitative Study of Curriculum Reform. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association; 1994.

[46] Edmund C. Forms of Curriculum Inquiry. Translated by Mahmoud Mehrmohammadi and colleagues (2nd Ed). Tehran: SAMT; 1931. Persian.

[47] Chalmers I, Hedges L, Cooper H.A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation and Health Professionals. 2002; 25: 12-37.

[48] Glass G. Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher. 1976; 5(10): 3-8.

[49] Barnett-Page Eline, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: A critical review. UK: ESRC National Centre for Research Methods; 2009.

[50] Gough D, Oliver S, Thomas J. An introduction to systematic reviews. UK: Sage; 2012.

[51] Pakseresht J. [Translation of Philosophical Schools and Examinations]. Guteg G (Author). Tehran: SAMT; 2015.  Persian.

[52] Kilpatrick WH. Philosophy of Education. x +465. New York Published by: Macmillan Company; 1951.

[54] Moursund, Daivid. Bielefeldt, Talbot. & Underwood, Siobhan. Foundationsfor the Road Ahead: Project-based learning and information technologies. Washington, DC: National Foundation for the Improvement of Education; 1997.

[54] Thomas J. Project based learning overview. Novato, CA: Buck Institute for Education; 1998.

[55] Geier R, Blumenfeld P, Marx R, Krajcik J, Fishman B,  Soloway E. Standardized test outcomes for students engaged in inquiry-based science curricula in the context of urban reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 2008; 45: 922–939.

[56] Strobel J, Barneveld A van. When is PBL more effective? A meta Synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning. 2008;3: 44–58.

[57] Wurdinger S, Enloe W.Cultivating life skills at a project-based charter school. Improving Schools. 2011; 14(1): 84–96.

[58] Hergenhahn BR, Olson M H. An Introduction to Theories of Learning (13nd Ed). UK: Taylor & Francis; 1996

[59] Safari M. [Translation of Multiple intelligence in the classroom]. Armstrong T (Author). Tehran: Doran; 2008. Persian.

[60] Seif AA. Modern Educational Psychology (6nd ed). Tehran: Doran; 2008. Persian.

[61] Williams M, Burden R. Psychology for language teachers. UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997.

[62] Takaya K. Jerome Bruner’s Theory of Education: From Early Bruner to Later Bruner. Interchange. 2008; 39(1): 1–19.

[63] Blank W. Authentic instruction. In William. Blank & Ssandy. Harwell (Eds.), Promising practices for connecting high school to the real world,15-21. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.ED:407586); 1997.

[64] Dickinson K, Soukamneuth S, Hanh C, Yu. Kimball M, D’Amico R, Perry R, et al. Providing educational services in the Summer Youth Employment and Training Program; 1998.  

[66] Reyes R. Native perspective on the school reform movement: A hot topics paper. Portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, Comprehensive Center Region X; 1998.

[66] Hennes M. Project teaching in an advanced fifth grade; 1921

[67] Brewster C, Fager J. Increasing student engagement and motivation: From time-on-task to homework. London: Sage Publishers; 2000.

[68] Adderley K. Project Methods in Higher Education. SRHE working party on teaching methods: Techniques group. Guildford, Surrey: Society for research into higher education; 1975.

[69] Edutopia T.Why Teach with Project-Based Learning? Providing Students with a Well-Rounded Classroom Experience.

[70] Bagheri M, Wan A, Wan Z, Abdullah CM Project-Based learning as a facilitator to promote students’ technology competencies. World Journal on Educational Technology. 2013; 5: 207-214.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259400244_Project-based_learning_as_a_facilitator_to_promote_students%27_technology_competencies

[71] Keegan A, Turner R. Quantity versus quality in Project-based learning practices.Management Learning. 2001; 32(1): 77-98.

[72] Fleming D. A Teacher's Guide to Project-Based Learning. Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED), Washington, DC; 2000.

[73] Helm JH, Katz L. Young investigators: The project approach in the early years. US: eachers College Press; 2001.

[74] Wurdinger S, Rudolph J. A different type of success: teaching important life skills through project based learning. Improving Schools. 2009; 12(2): 115-129.

[75] Langhout R, Day RJ, Simmons D. Integrating community in to the classroom. Urban Education; 37: 323-349.

[76] Bartscher K, Gould B, Nutter S. Increasing student motivating Through project-based learning. Master’s research project, Saint Xavier University and IRI/Skylight; 1995.

[77] Curtis D. Start with the pyramid; 2005

[78] Liu M, Hsiao YP. Middle school students as multimedia designers: A Project-based learning approach. Journal of Interactive Learning Research. 2002; 13(4): 311-337.

[79] Krajcik J, Blumenfeld P, Marx R, Bass K, Fredricks J, Soloway E. Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 1998; 7: 313–350.

[80] Marx R, Blumenfeld P, Krajcik J, Soloway E. Enacting project-based science: Challenges for practice and policy. Elementary School Journal. 1998; 97(4): 341–358.

[81] Prince MJ, Felder R. (2007). The many faces of inductive teaching and learning. Journal of College Science Teaching. 2007; 36(5): 14.

[82] Railsback J. Project-based Instruction: creating excitement for learning. portland, OR: Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory; 2002.

[83] Alloway G, Bos N, Hamel K, Hammerman T, Klann E,  Krajcik J. Creating an inquiry learning environment using the World Wide Web. Paper given at the International Conference on the Learning Sciences. Northwestern University, Evanston, IL; 1996.

[84] Moursund D. Project-based learning using information technology. International Society for Technology in Education Eugene, OR.; 2003

[85] Gultekin M. The effect of project based learning on learning outcomes in The 5th grade social studies course in primary education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice. 2005; 5(2): 548-556.

[86] Turgut H. Prospective science teachers’ conceptualizations about project-based learning. International Journal of Instruction. 2008; 1(1): 61-79.

[87] Yamzon A. An examination of the relationship between student choice in project-based learning and achievement; 1999.

[88] Diffily D.Project-based learning: Meeting social studies standards and the needs of gifted learners. Gifted Child Today. 2002; 25(3): 40-43, 59.

[89] Woolfolk A. Educational psychology (9th Ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Allyn & Bacon; 2004.

[90] Stites R. What does research say about outcomes from project-based learning? Web Extension to the Challenge 2000 Multimedia Project; 1998.

[91] Welsh JA. An exploration of project-based learning in two California Charter school. (doctoral dissertation). US: Unviersity of Southern California; 2006.

[92] Helm JH. The project approach catalog 4: Literacy and project work; 2003

[93] Kilpatrick WH. The project method; 1918.

[94] Blumenfeld P, Soloway E, Marx RW, Krajcik J,  Guzdial M, Palincsar A. Motivating Project-Based Learning: sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist. 1991; 26(3&4): 369-398.

[95] Frame D. The new project management: tools for an age of rapid change, corporate reengineering and other business realities. USA: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers; 1994.

[96] Pinto J. Power and politics in project management. USA: Project Management Institute; 1996.

[97] Arthur M, DeFillippi R, Jones C. Project based learning as the Interplay of career and company non-financial capital. Management Learning. 2001; 32(1): 99–117.

[98] Krajcik J, Czerniak CL. Teaching science in elementary and middle school: A project based approach. NY: Routledge; 2014.

[99] Dickinson K, Soukamneuth S, Cao YH, Kimball M,  D’Amico R, Perry R, et al. Providing educational services in the Summer Youth Employment and Training Program [Technical assistance guide]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Policy & Research; 1998.

[100] Larmer J, Mergendoller J.Seven Essentials for Project-Based Learning. Educational Leadership: Giving Students Meaningful Work.  2010; 68(1): 34-37.

[101] Diffily D. Project-based learning: Meeting social studies standards and theneeds of gifted learners. Gifted Child Today. 2002; 25(3):40-43, 59.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,450
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 873


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب