دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجائی
انتشارات دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجائی

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات11
تعداد شماره‌ها217
تعداد مقالات2,173
تعداد مشاهده مقاله3,124,268
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله2,266,598
Payganeh, Gh., Shahbazi Karami, J., Malekzadeh Fard, K.. (1391). Finite element comparison of single, bi-layered and three-layered tube hydroforming processes. فناوری آموزش, 2(2), 69-80. doi: 10.22061/jcarme.2013.54
Gh. Payganeh; J. Shahbazi Karami; K. Malekzadeh Fard. "Finite element comparison of single, bi-layered and three-layered tube hydroforming processes". فناوری آموزش, 2, 2, 1391, 69-80. doi: 10.22061/jcarme.2013.54
Payganeh, Gh., Shahbazi Karami, J., Malekzadeh Fard, K.. (1391). 'Finite element comparison of single, bi-layered and three-layered tube hydroforming processes', فناوری آموزش, 2(2), pp. 69-80. doi: 10.22061/jcarme.2013.54
Payganeh, Gh., Shahbazi Karami, J., Malekzadeh Fard, K.. Finite element comparison of single, bi-layered and three-layered tube hydroforming processes. فناوری آموزش, 1391; 2(2): 69-80. doi: 10.22061/jcarme.2013.54

Finite element comparison of single, bi-layered and three-layered tube hydroforming processes

Journal of Computational & Applied Research in Mechanical Engineering (JCARME)
مقاله 7، دوره 2، شماره 2، شهریور 2013، صفحه 69-80    اصل مقاله (7.96 M)
نوع مقاله: Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/jcarme.2013.54
نویسندگان
Gh. Payganeh* 1؛ J. Shahbazi Karami1؛ K. Malekzadeh Fard2
1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University (SRTTU), Tehran, Iran
2Space research institute, 26th Kilometer of Expressway of Tehran-Karaj, Tehran, Iran
تاریخ دریافت: 21 شهریور 1391،  تاریخ بازنگری: 09 دی 1391،  تاریخ پذیرش: 19 دی 1391 
چکیده
In this paper, single, bi-layered and three-layered tube hydroforming processes were numerically simulated using the finite element method. It was found that the final bulges heights resulted from the models were in good agreement with the experimental results. Three types of modeling were kept with the same geometry, tube material and process parameters to be compared between the obtained hydroformed products (branch height, thickness reduction and wrinkling) using different loading path types. The results were also discussed.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Tube hydro forming؛ Finite element simulation؛ Finite element comparison؛ Three-layered tube hydroforming
مراجع
[1] F. Dohmann and C. Hartl, “Hydroforming a method to manufacture light weight parts”, Journal of Materials Processing and Technology, Vol. 60, pp. 669-676, (1996).

[2] I. A. Choudhury, O. H. Lai  and L. T. Wong, “PAM-STAMP in the simulation of stamping process of an automotive component”, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Vol. 14, pp. 71-81, (2006).

[3] Z. Feng, H. Champliaud and T. My. Dao, “Numerical study of non-kinematical conical bending with cylindrical rolls”, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Vol. 17, pp. 1710-1722, (2009).

[4] K. Narmashiri and M. Z. Jumaat, “Reinforced steel I-beams: a comparison between 2D and 3D simulation”, Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, Vol. 19, pp. 564-585, (2011).

[5] M. Ahmed and M. S. J. Hashmi, “Three dimensional finite element simulation of axisymmetric tube bulging”, Proceedings of Pacific Congress on Manufacturing and management, Brisbane, Australia, pp. 515-521, (1998).

[6] M. Ahmed and M. S. J. Hashmi, “Defects in hydraulic bulge forming of tubular components and their implication for design and control of the process”, Advanced Methods in Material Processing Defects, pp. 197-220, (1997).

[7] P. Ray and B. J. Mac Donald, “Experimental study and finite element analysis of simple X- and T-branch tube hydroforming processes”, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, Vol. 47, No. 10,  pp. 1498-1518, (2005).

[8] F. Liu, J. Zheng, P. Xu, M. Xu and G. Zhu, “Forming mechanism of double-layered tubes by internal hydraulic expansion”, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, Vol. 81, No. 7, pp. 625-633, (2004).

[9] B. J. Mac Donald and M. S. J. Hashmi, “Finite element simulation of bulge forming of bimetallic tubes”, Proceeding of the international conference on Manufacturing, IMC2000, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp. 52-61, (2000).

[10] M. D. Islam, A. G. Olabi and M. S. J. Hashmi, “Feasibility of multi-layered tubular components forming by hydroforming and finite element simulation”, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 174, No. 1-3, pp 394-398, (2006).

[11] A.  Alaswad, A.  G.   Olabi and   K.  Y. Benyounis, “Integration of finite element analysis and design of experiments to analyse the geometrical  factors in bilayered tube hydroforming”, Materials and Design, Vol. 32, pp. 838-850, (2011).

[12] A. Alaswad, K. Y. Benyounis and A. G. Olabi,   “Finite element comparison of single and bi-layered tube hydro-form processes”, Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 1584-1593, (2011).

[13] J. Shahbazi Karami, K. Malekzadeh and G. Payganeh, “Present of three-layered hydro-forming analysis of a new hybrid sandwich tubes using finite element method”,   International  journal of mechanical and industrial engineering (IJMIE), Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 17-24, (2012).

[14] J. Shahbazi Karami, K. Aghababaee, K. Malekzadeh and M. Soroush, “Effect of add an aluminum foam layer to bi-layer tubes to make sandwich tubes and finite element simulation of tube hydroforming process for make a X-branch part”, International Conference on Automotive, Mechanical and Materials Engineering (ICAMME'2012), Penang, Malaysia, (2012).

[15] J. Shahbazi Karami, K. Malekzadeh and G. Payganeh, “Study of geometrical parameters on hydroforming of a new three-layered sandwich tube and finite element simulation”, International Conference on Mechanical, Automotive and  Materials Engineering (ICMAME'   2012), Dubai, UAE, pp. 158-162, (2012).

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,687
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,348


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. طراحی و پیاده سازی از سیناوب