ارائه الگوی مفهومی تربیت هنری فناورانه برای پرورش مهارت‏های موردنیاز افراد در قرن 21

کرمی, زهره

doi:10.22061/tej.2024.10045.2931

نشریات مستقل دانشگاه در سامانه ارزیابی نشریات علمی وزارت علوم

نشریه معماری وشهرسازی پایدار موفق به اخذ رتبه علمی-پژوهشی شد

تعداد نشریات	13
تعداد شماره‌ها	200
تعداد مقالات	2,008
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	2,680,151
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	1,937,353

	ارائه الگوی مفهومی تربیت هنری فناورانه برای پرورش مهارت‏های موردنیاز افراد در قرن 21
فناوری آموزش
مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 28 اردیبهشت 1403 اصل مقاله (1.21 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله مروری
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/tej.2024.10045.2931
نویسنده
زهره کرمی^*
گروه آموزش علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران
تاریخ دریافت: 27 دی 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 18 فروردین 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 28 اردیبهشت 1403
چکیده
پیشینه و اهداف: انسان‏ها، در قرن 21 با چالش‏های متعددی مواجه هستند که برای غلبه بر آن‏ها باید مهارت‏هایی را کسب کنند. برخی از ابزارها مانند هنر و فناوری، قابلیت‏های منحصر به فردی برای تربیت ایجاد می‏کنند که از آن‌ها می‏توان برای رویارویی با چالش‏های قرن 21 استفاده کرد. هدف از این مقاله، تشریح رویکرد تربیت هنری فناورانه برای پرورش مهارت‏های قرن 21 در دانش‏آموزان است. روش‌ها‌: این مطالعه، یک پژوهش کیفی است که به شیوه فراترکیب انجام شده است. در گام نخست، در بازه زمانی مشخص «از سال 1992 تا 2020»، پایگاه‏های معتبر علمی خارجی (ساینس دایرکت، اسپرینگر، گوگل اسکولار، اریک، تیلور اند فرانسیس، و ...) و پایگاه‏های داخلی بــا اسـتفاده از واژگان و اصطلاحات خاص مانند نظریه انعطاف‏پذیری شناختی، محیط‏های یادگیری الکترونیکی و مجازی، انعطاف‏پذیری شناختی، اصول و معیارهای نظریه انعطاف‏پذیری شناختی و ... جستجو و تمامی مقالات و متون مرتبط، جمع‏آوری شدند. در نهایت، 120 سند یافت شد کـه از این تعـداد، 60 سند، متناسب با سؤالات پژوهش بودند. بعد از مطالعه دقیق متون، با توجه به سؤالات پژوهش، اطلاعات لازم استخراج شد. به‌منظور تحلیل داده‏ها، از روش تحلیل مضمون و جهت سنجش پایایی، از روش توافق بین دو کدگذار استفاده شد. یافته‌ها: براساس یافته‏ها، الگوی مفهومی تربیت هنری فناورانه برای پرورش مهارت‏های مورد نیاز افراد در قرن 21 ارائه شد. الگو، دارای 5 بخش اصلی (چالش‏های قرن 21، مهارت‏های مورد نیاز افراد برای رویارویی با چالش‏های قرن 21، ابزارهای موردنیاز برای پرورش مهارت‏های قرن21، روش‏های پرورش مهارت‏های قرن21، و فعالیت‏های مبتنی بر هنر و فناوری برای پرورش مهارت‏های قرن 21) است که هرکدام از این بخش‏های اصلی، بخش‏های فرعی دیگری نیز دارند. براساس این الگو، چالش‏های قرن 21 عبارتند: از چالش فناوری، چالش ماهیت کار، چالش اقتصادی و چالش اجتماعی؛ مهارت‏های مورد نیاز افراد برای رویارویی با چالش‏های قرن 21 عبارتند از: مهارت‏های عمومی و مهارت‏های تخصصی؛ ابزارهای مورد نیاز برای پرورش مهارت‏های قرن21 عبارتند: از ابزارهای تربیت هنری و ابزارهای تربیت فناورانه؛ روش‏های پرورش مهارت‏های قرن21 عبارتند از: تربیت هنری، تربیت فناورانه و تربیت هنری فناورانه؛ و فعالیت‏های مبتنی بر هنر و فناوری برای پرورش مهارت‏های قرن 21 نیز شامل: فعالیت‏های هنری، فعالیت‏های فناوری و فعالیت‏های تلفیقی هنری و فناوری (هنری فناورانه) است. به‌منظور تسهیل اجرای الگوی تربیت هنری فناورانه، دو روش تلفیق هنر و فناوری در برنامه درسی رسمی و غیررسمی مدارس؛ و تلفیق چهار بخشی هنر و فناوری در برنامه درسی مدارس، پیشنهاد شد. نتیجه‌گیری: با بهره ‏گیری از مزایای هنر و فناوری، می‏توان افرادی را تربیت کرد که قادرند بر چالش‏های قرن 21 غلبه کنند. تربیت هنری و تربیت فناورانه، به تنهایی این قابلیت را دارند که مهارت‏های قرن21 را پرورش دهند؛ ولی با تلفیق این دو و اجرای تربیت هنری فناورانه می‏توان به نتایج مطلوب‏‎تری دست یافت. آموزش و پروش، با تلفیق فناوری و هنر در برنامه درسی رسمی و غیررسمی مدارس، می‏تواند به یادگیرندگان کمک کند. به‌منظور غلبه بر بر چالش‏های قرن21، تفکر خلاق، حل مسأله، تفکر انتقادی، مهارت‏های فردی و بین فردی خود را بهبود بخشند. الگوی مفهومی تربیت هنری فناورانه با تلفیق هنر و فناوری در برنامه درسی رسمی و غیررسمی مدارس می‏تواند به یادگیرندگان کمک کند تا مهارت‏های تفکر برتر خود را بهبود بخشند و با مجهز شدن به مهارت‏های مورد نیاز در قرن 21، بر چالش‏های این قرن، غلبه نمایند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
فناوری؛ تربیت هنری؛ تربیت هنری فناورانه؛ مهارت‏های قرن21
موضوعات
فناوری آموزش- یادگیری تلفیقی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Providing a Conceptual Model of Technological Art Education to Develop the Skills Required by People in the 21st Century
نویسندگان [English]
Z. Karami
Department of educational sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Background and Objectives: Humans in the 21st century face multiple challenges that require them to acquire certain skills in order to overcome them. Some tools, such as art and technology, create unique capabilities for education that can be used to address the challenges of the 21st century. The purpose of this article was to describe the approach of technological artistic education for developing 21st-century skills in students. Methods: This study was a qualitative research conducted in a meta-synthesis approach. In the first step, reputable foreign scientific databases (such as ScienceDirect, Springer, Google Scholar, Eric, Taylor and Francis, etc.) and domestic databases were searched using specific keywords and terms such as cognitive flexibility theory, electronic and virtual learning environments, cognitive flexibility, principles and criteria of cognitive flexibility theory, etc., within the specified time range from 1992 to 2020. All relevant articles and texts were collected. In the end, 120 documents were found, of which 60 documents were relevant to the research questions. After careful reading of the texts, the necessary information was extracted according to the research questions. For data analysis, thematic analysis method was used, and inter-coder reliability was assessed using the agreement method between two coders. Findings: Based on the findings, the conceptual model of artistic-technological education was presented to develop the necessary skills of individuals in the 21st century. The pattern consisted of five main sections (challenges of the 21st century, skills needed to face the challenges of the 21st century, tools required to cultivate 21st-century skills, methods of cultivating 21st-century skills, and art and technology-based activities for cultivating 21st-century skills), each of which also had sub-sections. According to this pattern, the challenges of the 21st century included technological challenges, the nature of work challenges, economic challenges, and social challenges. The skills needed to face the challenges of the 21st century included general skills and specialized skills. The tools required to cultivate 21st-century skills included artistic education tools and technological education tools. The methods of cultivating 21st-century skills included artistic education, technological education, and artistic-technological education. And the art and technology-based activities for cultivating 21st-century skills included artistic activities, technological activities, and combined artistic and technological activities (artistic-technological activities). In order to facilitate the implementation of the artistic-technological education model, two methods of combining art and technology in the formal and informal curriculum of schools and the integration of four-parts of art and technology in the curriculum of schools were suggested. Conclusion: By utilizing the benefits of art and technology, individuals can be trained to overcome the challenges of the 21st century. Artistic education and technological education alone have the capability to cultivate 21st-century skills, but by combining the two and implementing artistic technological education, more desirable results can be achieved. Integrating technology and art in the formal and informal curriculum of schools can help learners improve their creative thinking, problem-solving, critical thinking, and personal and interpersonal skills in order to overcome the challenges of the 21st century. The conceptual model of artistic technological education, with the integration of art and technology in the formal and informal curriculum of schools, and can help learners improve their superior thinking skills and overcome the challenges of this century by equipping themselves with the necessary skills for the 21st century.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Technology, Education Art, Technological Art Education, 21 Century Skills

مراجع
[1] Mehrmouhammadi M. Explaining the aesthetic turn in Education: Lessons of the macro and micro for improving the quality of education with inspire of the world of art. Journal of Education. 2010: 27(1). 11-34. [In Persian] [2] Saunders L. On Flying, Writing Poetry and Doing Educational Research. British Educational Research Journal. 2003: 29(2), 175 - 187. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/0141192032000060920 [3] Mehrmouhammadi M., & Amini M. Planing the ideal model for art education at elementary school. Journal of Humanities. 2001: 11(39), 219-245. [In Persian] [4] Kececi E. Art education in Cyprus. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012: 51, 823 – 827. [5] Ulku C. The Role of Decoration Magazines in the Art Education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2012: 47, 1588-1591. [6] Eisner E. W. Reimagining schools: The selected works of Elliot W. Eisner. Routledge: 2005. [7] Peppler K. Media Arts: Arts Education for a Digital Age. Teachers College Record. 2010: 112(8), 2118–2153. [8] Hunter M. Education and the Arts: Research overview. A summary report prepared for the Australia Council for the Arts, Australia Council for the Arts, Sydney. Canberra: Australian Government and Australian Council for the Arts: 2005. [9] Seitz H. J. The Plan Building on Children’s Interests. YC Young Children. 2006: 61(2), 36- 41. [10] Choi H., & Piro J. M. Expanding Arts Education in a Digital Age. Arts Education Policy Review. 2009: 110:3, 27-34. [11] Conole G., & Dyke M. What are the affordances of information and communication technologies? ALT-J, Research in Learning Technology. 2004: 12(2), 113 - 124. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0968776042000216183 [12] Chung S. K. Art Education Technology: Digital Storytelling. Art Education. 2007: 60 (2)17-22. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00043125.2007.11651632 [13] Jenkins H. Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York: Routledge: 2006. [14] Salen K. Toward an ecology of gaming. The Ecology of Games: Connecting Youth, Games, and Learning. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press: 2008. [15] Hull G. A. & Schultz K. (Eds). School’s out: Bridging out-of-school literacies with classroom practice. New York: Teachers College Press: 2002. [16] Brown J. S. & Adler R. Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail and Learning 2.0. Educause Review. 2008: 43, 17-32. [17] Herold D. Digital natives: Discourses of exclusion in an inclusive society. Generational use of new media. 2012: 71-86. [18] Mousa Pour N., Hori A., & Hidari hematabadi, Z. System of curriculum in accordance with the information literacy. Journal of curriculum studies.2007: 1(4). 29-48. [In Persian] [19] Clark C.R., Mayer R. E. e- Learning and the Science of Instruction. Sanfrancisco: Jossey- bass Pfeiffer: 2007. [20] Moreno R & Layne L. O. Do classroom exemplars promote the application of principles in teacher education? A comparison of videos, animations, and narratives. Education Tech Research Dev. 2008: 56(4),449–465. [21] Palote R., & Pratte K. Virtual student (translated by Farhad ShafiPoormotlagh). Mahalat: Islamic Azad University: 2006. [In Persian] [22] Brook C., Oliver R. Online learning communities: Investigating a Design Framework. Australian Journal of Educational Technology. 2003: 19(2), 139-160. [23] Wiberg M. Netlearning and Learning through Networks. Educational Technology & Society. 2007: 10 (4), 49-61. [24] SennG.J. Comparison of Face-To-Face and Hybrid Delivery of a Course that Requires Technology Skills Development. Journal of Information Technology Education. 2008:7, 268-284. [25] Dron J. Designing the Undesignable: Social Software and Control. Educational Technology & Society. 2007: 10 (3), 60-71. [26] Dass R. Literature and the 21st Century Learner. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014: 123, 289-298. [27] Rideout VJ; Foehr UG.; & Roberts DF. Generation M 2: Media in the Lives of 8-to 18-Year-Olds. Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation: 2010. [28] Peppler K. New Opportunities for Interest-Driven Arts Learning in a digital age. A Report Commissioned by the Wallace foundation: 2013. [29] Gregory D. C. Boxes with Fire: Wisely Integrating Learning Technologies in the Art Classroom. Art Education. 2009: 62(3), 47-54. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00043125.2009.11519020 [30] Zimmer L. Qualitative meta‐synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2006: 53(3), 311-318. [31] National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education. All Our Futures: Creativity, Culture and Education. Established in February 1998 by the Secretary of State for Education and Employment, the Rt. Hon David Blunkett MP and the Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, the Rt. Hon Chris Smith MP: 1999. [32] Partnership for 21st Century Skills. 21st century skills and social studies map. Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies and Partnership for 21st Century Skills: 2008 [33] Wagner T. Rigor redefined. Educational Leadership. 2008: 66(2), 20–24. [34] Jimoyiannis A. Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teacher’s professional development. Computers & Education. 2010: 55(3).1259-1269 [35] Garrett P. Arts in Australia’s national school curriculum, Media Release. Canberra: Ministry for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts. 2009. [36] Robinson K. The arts in schools: Principles, practice and provision. Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation; 1989. [37] Ferrer M., Rovira, M. & Soler-i-Martí, R. Youth empowerment through arts education: A case study of a non‐formal education arts centre in Barcelona. Social Inclusion. 2022: 10(2), 85-94. [38] Peppler K. & Davis, H. Arts and learning: A review of the impact of arts and aesthetics on learning and opportunities for further research. Paper published in the proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Chicago, IL: 2010. [39] Pugh, K., Girod, M. Science, Art, and Experience: Constructing a Science Pedagogy from Dewey’s Aesthetics. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 2007: 18, 9-27. [40] Nevanen S., Juvonen A., & Ruismäki H. Art education as multi professional collaboration. International Journal of Education & the Arts. 2012: 13(1). 1-22. [41] Eisner E. Chapter II: Aesthetic Modes of Knowing. Teachers College Record 86, 6 ,1985: 23-36. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/016146818508600602?journalCode=tcza [42] Gude O. Art education for democratic life. Art Education. 2009: 62(6), 6-11. [43] Bowen D. H.,& Kisida, B. Investigating arts education effects on school engagement and climate. Educational Policy. 2023: 1-31. [44] Englebright Fox J., & Schirrmacher R. Art and Creative Development for Young Children. Albany. Delmar: 2002. [45] Malin H. Creating a children's art world: Negotiating participation, identity, and meaning in the elementary school art room. International Journal of Education & the Arts. 2012: 13(6), 1-22. [46] Miller C., & Saxton J. (2004). Into the story: Language in action through drama. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann: 2004. [47] Ewing R. Creating imaginative possibilities in K–6 English. In J. Manuel, P. Brock, D. Carter, & W. Sawyer (Eds.), Imagination, innovation, creativity: Previsioning English education. Sydney: Phoenix: 2009. [48] Ewing R. (2010). The arts and Australian education: realizing potential. By acer press: Australian council for educational research: 2010. [49] Anderson M., & Jefferson, M. Teaching the screen. Sydney: Allen & Unwin: 2009. [50] Pitri E. Teacher research in the socio constructivist art classroom. Art Education. 2006: 29(5), 40-45. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00043125.2005.11651610 [51] Punie Y. Learning spaces: An ICT-enabled model of future learning in the knowledge-based society. European Journal of Education. 2007: 42,185-199. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.1465-3435.2007.00302.x [52] Salmons J.E. Overview of the Taxonomy of Collaboration. Sharpe, R., Beetham, H., & De FreitasS., Eds (2010) Rethinking Learning for a Digital Age. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group New York: 2010. [53] Cutshall S. Clicking across cultures. Educational Leadership. 2009: 67(1), 40–44. [54] Walser N. Teaching 21st century skills. Harvard Education Letter. 2008: 24 (5). [55] Metcalf S. J., Clarke, J., & Dede, C. Virtual worlds for education: River City and EcoMUVE. MiT6 International Conference: 2009. [56] Boss S. (2009). High tech reflection strategies make learning stick. Social & emotional learning (SEL): 2009. [57] Knobel M., & Wilber, D. Let’s talk 2.0. Educational Leadership. 2009: 66(6), 20–24. [58] Hagood M. C., Stevens L. P., & Reinking, D. What do THEY Have to Teach US? Talkin' 'Cross Generations! In D. E. Alvermann (Ed.), Adolescents and Literacies in a Digital World. New York: Peter Lang Publishing: 2002. [59] Buckingham D. Media Education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press: 2013. [60] Brown A. Motivation to Learn and Understand: On Taking Charge of One's Own Learning. Cognition and Instruction. 1988: 5(4), 311-321. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s1532690xci0504_4 [61] Bonwell C. & Eison J. Active Learning: Creating Excitement in the Classroom. AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No.1. Washington D.C.: Jossey-Bass. ISBN 1-87838-00-87: 1991. [62] Law N., Lee Y., & Chow A. Practice characteristics that lead to 21st century learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2002: 18, 415–426. [63] Siemens G. Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. Canada: elearnspace: 2004. [64] Peppler K. & Kafai, Y. From SuperGoo to Scratch: Exploring creative digital media production in informal learning. Learning, Media, and Technology. 2007: 32(2), 149-166. [65] Assey J. (1999). The future of technology in K-12 arts education. ERIC Clearinghouse: 1999. [66] Jones T. Art and lifelong learning. Journal of art & design education. 1999: 18 (1), 135-142. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-5949.00165 [67] Gauntlett D. Making is Connecting: The social meaning of creativity, from DIY and knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Polity: 2011. [68] Lenhart A. & Madden M. Social Networking Websites and Teens: An Overview. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project: 2007.
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 113 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 80

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

پیوندهای مفید

اخبار و اعلانات

آمار

ارائه الگوی مفهومی تربیت هنری فناورانه برای پرورش مهارت‏های موردنیاز افراد در قرن 21