شناسایی و اعتباریابی معیارهای تولید فیلم و ویدئوی آموزشی برای دانش آموزان دوره ابتدایی

مجیدی درچه, زهراسادات; سبزه, بتول; انصاری, نسرین

doi:10.22061/tej.2024.9940.2919

نشریات مستقل دانشگاه در سامانه ارزیابی نشریات علمی وزارت علوم

نشریه معماری وشهرسازی پایدار موفق به اخذ رتبه علمی-پژوهشی شد

تعداد نشریات	13
تعداد شماره‌ها	200
تعداد مقالات	2,008
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	2,679,922
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	1,937,253

	شناسایی و اعتباریابی معیارهای تولید فیلم و ویدئوی آموزشی برای دانش آموزان دوره ابتدایی
فناوری آموزش
مقاله 8، دوره 18، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 70، فروردین 1403، صفحه 399-414 اصل مقاله (1 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/tej.2024.9940.2919
نویسندگان
زهراسادات مجیدی درچه؛ بتول سبزه^* ؛ نسرین انصاری
گروه آموزش علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه فرهنگیان، تهران، ایران
تاریخ دریافت: 30 آبان 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 14 بهمن 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 03 اسفند 1402
چکیده
پیشینه و اهداف: هدف کلی پژوهش، شناسایی و اعتباریابی تولید معیارهای تولید فیلم و ویدئوی آموزشی برای دانش‌آموزان دوره ابتدایی است. تا سالهای متمادی، فیلم‌ و ویدئو به دلیل هزینه‌های بالا و محدودیت دسترسی، تنها در برخی از مدارس به‌صورت محدود تهیه و استفاده می‌شد؛ اما با پیشرفت فناوری این محدودیت تا حد زیادی مرتفع شد. به‌ویژه، بعد از گسترش آموزش های مجازی، اکثر معلمان و مربیان با استفاده از موبایل و دوربین های دیجیتال اقدام به تولید فیلم و ویدئوهای آموزشی کردند. یکی از چالش های مهم در این زمینه، نبود معیارها و اصول تهیه فیلم و ویدئوهای آموزشی مختص دانش آموزان بود. معیارهایی که بتواند به‌صورت خاص، کیفیت مناسبی را برای این گروه سنی محک بزند و به‌عنوان راهنمایی در اختیار معلمان و تولیدکنندگان در آموزشهای ترکیبی و مجازی قرار گیرد. روش‌ها‌: تحقیق حاضر، از لحاظ هدف کاربردی و روش انجام آن آمیخته با طرح اکتشافی متوالی است. در قسمت کیفی با استفاده از تحلیل محتوای قیاسی، داده‌های موردنیاز، از منابع استخراج شد و سپس با استفاده از روش کمّی مورد اعتباریابی قرار گرفت. جامعه آماری بخش کیفی شامل مقالات و پایان نامه ها و کتابهای الکترونیکی و چاپی در دسترس و مرتبط در فاصله زمانی 2000 تا 2021 بود. نمونه‌ مورد مطالعه با روش هدفمند و معیار‌مدار انتخاب شد و براساس الگوی بودین و کوئیک مضامین اصلی استخراج و کدگذاری شدند. در بخش کمّی نیز 60 نفر از معلمان و متخصصان به‌صورت هدفمند استفاده شد. به‌‌منظور جمع‌آوری داده‌ها و تحلیل یافته‌ها در بعد کیفی از روش تحلیل محتوا و استخراج مضامین اصلی، فرعی و شاخص ها استفاده شد. سپس برای اطمینان از نحوه کدگذاری‌ها، علاوه بر تکنیک خودبازبینی، از دو نفر از متخصصان استفاده شد. درنهایت، اعتباریابی معیارهای شناسایی شده با استفاده از نرم‌افزارPLS و معادلات ساختاری در دو بخش اعتبار (همسانی درونی) و روایی (اعتبار واگرا) سازه ها و ابزارهای پژوهش و همچنین آزمون مدل ساختاری انجام شد. یافته‌ها: یافتههای کیفی در چهار بعد فنی، هنری، محتوایی و طراحی آموزشی به‌دست آمد که در بعد فنی شامل معیارهای رسایی و وضوح تن صدای گوینده؛ کیفیت نور، وضوح تصویر و اندازه فیلم با توجه به نوع رسانه دیداری، عدم داشتن لکنت کلام گوینده و برتری سطح صدای گوینده نسبت به زمینه بود. در بعد هنری معیارهای قاب‌بندی مناسب فیلم باتوجه ‌به هدف آموزشی و درک تصویری دانش‌آموز، تنوع نماها با توجه ‌به نوع محتوا، جلب و حفظ توجه در مؤلفه های دیداری و شنیداری با ایجاد جلوه‌های ویژه، تناسب طراحی صحنه و پس‌زمینه با توجه ‌به نوع محتوا و قابل باور بودن شخصیت‌های فیلم از نظر فیزیکی، جنس، سن، آراستگی و پوشش مورد توجه قرار گرفت. در بعد محتوایی معیارهای صحت علمی محتوا، مرتبط بودن مطالب آموزشی با هدف اصلی یادگیری، حذف محتوای غیرمرتبط، به ‌روز و معتبر بودن محتوا، پرهیز از سوگیری در ارتباط با جنسیت، سن، نژاد، زبان و یا طبقه اجتماعی و ساده‌سازی محتوای پیچیده با توجه ‌به جزئیات محتوا قابل توجه بود. در بعد طراحی آموزشی معیارها شامل تناسب سرعت گفتار متن با میزان درک دانش آموزان، برانگیختن حس کنجکاوی با ایجاد موقعیت اکتشافی، تقویت انگیزه مطالعه و یادگیری با ایجاد موقعیت چالشی، ایجاد توقف در فیلم و ویدئوی آموزشی جهت پیوند دادن محتوا با یادگیری قبلی دانش آموزان، ایجاد توقف در فیلم یا ویدئو جهت تشویق تعامل در مورد آن‌چه ارائه شده، خودداری از نمایش چهره ارائه‌کننده در زمان ارائه محتوای پیچیده، ارائه مثال‌های کاربردی از مفهوم یا مهارت‌آموزشی، ایجاد توقف در هنگام ارائه جهت ایجاد فرصت تفکر و گرفتن نظرات مخاطبان و یادداشت‌برداری خلاقانه برای حدس ادامه اتفاقات فیلم در نظر گرفته شد. همچنین، نتایج اعتبارسنجی با استفاده از معادلات ساختاری، ارزیابی ساختاری و برازش کلی نشان داد که مقدار GOF برای معیار فنی، هنری، محتوایی و آموزشی به ترتیب برابر 181/0، 233/0 و 296/0 است؛ لذا مدل نیکویی برازش قوی و مناسبی داشته و قابل تعمیم و استفاده است. نتیجه‌گیری: در این پژوهش، معیارهای تولید فیلم و ویدئوی آموزشی مختص دانشآموزان دوره ابتدایی در چهار بعد فنی، هنری، محتوایی و طراحی آموزشی شناسایی و اعتبارسنجی شدند. این معیارها میتوانند به‌عنوان راهنما، یاریگر معلمان و متخصصانی باشند که در آموزشهای مجازی و ترکیبی محتوای درسی خود را در قالب فیلم و ویدئو تولید میکنند تا گامی مؤثر در کیفیتبخشی و تداوم آموزشها بردارند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تولید محتوا؛ محتوای الکترونیکی؛ فیلم و ویدئو آموزشی؛ معیار؛ دانش آموزان دوره ابتدایی
موضوعات
تهیه و تدوین محتوای الکترونیکی
عنوان مقاله [English]
Identifying and validating criteria for the production of educational films and videos for elementary school students
نویسندگان [English]
z. Majidi Dorche؛ B. Sabzeh؛ N. Ansari
Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
چکیده [English]
Background and Objectives: The general purpose of the research was to identify and validate the criteria for the production of educational films and videos for elementary school students. For many years, film and video were only prepared and used in a limited way in some schools due to high costs and limited access. However, this limitation has been lifted to a great extent with the advancement of technology. Especially after the expansion of virtual education, most teachers and trainers started producing educational films and videos using mobile phones and digital cameras. One of the important challenges in this field was lack of standards and principles for preparing educational films and videos for students. Criteria that can specifically test the quality of this age group and be available to teachers and producers in combined and virtual training as a guide were presented here. Methods: The present research was combined with a sequential exploratory design in terms of its practical purpose and method. In the qualitative part, the required data was extracted from the sources using comparative content analysis and then validated using the quantitative method. The statistical population of the qualitative section included articles, theses, and electronic and printed books available and related between 2000 and 2021. The corpus was formulated with a purposeful and criteria-based method, and the main themes were extracted and coded based on the Boudin and Quick model. In the quantitative part, 60 teachers and specialists were included in the sample purposefully. In order to collect data and analyze the findings in the qualitative dimension, content analysis and extraction of main, sub-themes, and indicators were used. Then, in addition to the self-review technique, two experts were invited to ensure the coding method. Findings: Qualitative findings in the four dimensions of technical, artistic, content and educational design were: the technical dimension criteria: expressiveness and clarity of the speaker's voice, light quality, image resolution and film size, lack of stuttering of the speaker's words and the superiority of the speaker's voice level compared to the background. In the artistic dimension, the criteria were: suitable framing of the film according to the educational goal and visual understanding of the student, variety of shots according to the type of content, attracting and maintaining attention with special effects, appropriateness of stage and background design according to the type of content,the believability of the characters in the film is physical, gender, age, grooming and clothing. The content aspect of the criteria included: the scientific accuracy of the content, the relevance of the educational content to the main learning goal, the removal of irrelevant content, the up-to-dateness and validity of the content, avoiding bias in relation to gender, age, race, language or social class, and simplifying complex content. According to the details of the content, the dimension of educational design included the appropriateness of the speech speed of the text with the level of students' understanding, arousing the sense of curiosity by creating an exploratory situation, strengthening the motivation to study and learn by creating a challenging situation, creating pauses in the video to link the content with the student's previous learning, creating and pausing in the video to encourage interaction about what was presented, refraining from showing the presenter's face when presenting complex content, providing practical examples of the concept or educational skill, creating a pause during the presentation to create an opportunity to think and get the audience's comments, and creative note-taking to guess what to continue, the events of the movie, Also, the results of validation using structural equations and the general fit of GOF value for technical, artistic, content, and educational criteria were equal to 0.181, 0.233, and 0.296 respectively, so the goodness model had a strong and appropriate fit and could be generalized. Conclusion: This study identified and validated criteria for producing electronic content (educational films and videos) specifically for elementary school students in four dimensions: technical, artistic, content, and instructional design. These criteria can serve as a guide for teachers and experts who produce their educational content in the form of films and videos for virtual and blended learning environments, taking an effective step quality and continuity of education.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Content Production, Electronic Content, Educational Videos, Criteria, Elementary School Students

مراجع
[1] Isazadeh Nesheli, E., Rahman & Modiri, N., Safavi, A. Investigating and presenting solutions for e-learning and providing a framework for electronic ecological education in the context of the internet. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Advanced Research in Science, Engineering, and Technology, Tehran. 2020. [In Persian] [2] Karsenti, T., & Bugmann, J. Digital education in the time of Covid-19. Journal of educational technology & society. 2020;23(1):69-59. [3]Khosravi Cheken, M., Rostminja, H. A., & Akbari, B. M. (n.d.). Identifying professional competencies of electronic content production specialists. Technology of Education Journal (TEJ).2023; 7(1). [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22061/tej.2022.9050.2775 [4] Ahmadi Azar Sangan, Z. Mohammadi, F and Firoz, M. "Producing electronic content using educational resources available on the web for classroom teaching in smart primary schools in Tabriz: challenges and solutions," Theory and Practice in Curriculum. 2019; 8(16): 333-364. [In Persian] [5] Seraji, F; Attaran, M. E-Learning: Foundation, design, implementation Evaluation. Hamadan: Bo Ali Sina University, Publications. 2017. [In Persian] [6] Viner, R. M., Russell, S. J., Croker, H., Packer, J., Ward, J., Stansfield, C., ... & Booy, R. School closure and management practices during coronavirus outbreaks including COVID-19: a rapid systematic review. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health .2020; 4(5): 397-404. [7] Yan, L., Whitelock-Wainwright, A., Guan, Q., Wen, G., Gasevic, D., & Chen, G. Students’ experience of online learning during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A province‐wide survey study. British Journal of Educational Technology .2021; 52. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13102 [8] Saeedi, M. Principles of Design and Production of Educational Animations, Emphasizing on Target Age Group. [master’s thesis]. Governmental - Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology - Tarbiat Modares University - Faculty of Art and Architecture .2016. [9] Subaidi bin Abdul Samat M, Aziz AA. The effectiveness of multimedia learning in enhancing reading comprehension among indigenous pupils. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ). 2020;11(2): 290-302. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.20 [10] Betthäuser, B.A., Bach-Mortensen, A.M. & Engzell, P. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence on learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat Hum Behav. 2023;7: 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01506-4 [11] Saad, N., Jaffar, A., Abdullah, N., Hassan, R., & Kasolang, S. CDIO Framework in Strengthening the Student-Centered Learning Approach. 2014. [12] Razavi, S. A. Principles of Designing and Producing Educational Films. Tehran: SAMT.2008. [In Persian] [13] Michel, E., Schneider, W. Educational films in the classroom: Increasing the benefit Learning and Instruction. 2007; 17(2):183-172 . [14] Denning D. Video in theory and practice: Issues for classroom use and teacher video evaluation. Victoria: In NATURE productions. 1992. [15] Zahrulianingdyah A. Reproductive Health Education Model in Early Childhood through Education Film" Damar Wulan". Journal of Education and Practice . 2015;6(19):184-9. [16] Yousefi Kandar, N. Mousavipour. S. The Effect of Screening Time of Educational Films on the Learning and Retention of Guidance School Girls. Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation (Quarterly) . 2016; Nov 21; 9(35): 83-103. [In Persian] [17] Mayer RE. Based principles for designing multimedia instruction. Acknowledgments and Dedication. 2014; 59. [18] Kozma, R. B., & Clark, J. H. The influence of video on cognitive load and learning: value for medical education? Perspectives on Medical Education. 2013.;(2): 73-81. [19] Zarrabian, F. Investigating the Effect of Multimedia E-content Based on the Principles of Instructional Design on the Learning of Mathematics and Science Lessons in Sixth Grade Elementary School Students. Journal of Curriculum Research. 2018; 8(2): 48-69. [InPersian] [20] Yazdani, M. Barzegar, M. Hadi, N, Ghasemi, N. Investigating the impact of electronic education on students' behavior from the teachers' point of view. 2014: 443-434. [In Persian] [21] Ghorbani, S. Sadeghi, A. Ahghar, Gh. The Effect of Multimedia Software on the Creativity and Academic Achievement of Fifth Grade Students in Experimental Science. Initiative and Creativity in Humanities. 2019; Jun 20; 8(4): 195-218. [In Persian] [22] Najafinejad Moshizi, F. Tohidie, A, Tajrobekar, M. The Effectiveness of Virtual Education Using the Four-Component Instructional Design Model of van Merriënboer in Multimedia Science on Cognitive Load, Learning, and Academic Motivation of Sixth Grade Elementary School Students. Innovative Approaches in Education. 2020; Aug 22; 15(1): 157-176. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22108/nea.2021.124725.1518 [23] Negarandeh R. Nursing and patient advocacy: a grounded theory. 18th International Nursing Research Congress Focusing on Evidence-Based Practice. 2007 ;July 11-14: Vienna, Austria. [24] Herrlinger S, Höffler TN, Opfermann M, Leutner D. When do pictures help to learn from the expository text? Multimedia and modality effects in primary schools. Research in Science Education. 2017; Jun; 47:685-704. http://doi:10.1007/S11165-016-9525-Y [25] Ou C, Joyner DA, Goel AK. Designing and developing video lessons for online learning: A seven-principle model. Online Learning. 2019; Jun; 23(2): 82-104. [26] Lawson TJ, Bodle JH, McDonough TA. Techniques for increasing student learning from educational videos: Notes versus guiding questions. The teaching of Psychology. 2007; Jun 5; 34(2): 90-3. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280701291309 [27] Hashemi, F., & Gharishi, S. A. The effect of instructional factors based on electronic learning environments on reading comprehension skills of sixth-grade elementary students. Technology of Education Journal. 2021; 16(1): 13-26. [In Persian] [28] Pourrostaei Ardakani, S. Arefi, Z. Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-Based Game-Based Learning and Film-Based Learning on the Creativity and Motivation of Students. Journal of Educational Technology. 2017; 11(4): 347-358. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22061/jte.2017.733 [29] Keyaei, J. Designing and Producing E-learning Courseware Based on Metacognitive Strategies and Its Role in Improving Students' Problem-Solving Skills. Journal of Psychological and Educational Studies. 2016; 2(1): 36-48. [In Persian] [30] Bastian, T. J., & Martens, R. L. The Perception of Learning Materials Based on the Four-Component Instructional Design Model: Two Studies on the Motivational Effects of Learning with Complex Tasks. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, Illinois. 2007; April : 9-13. [31] Moshfegh Arani, B., & Amir teimouri, H. Production and Application of Learning Materials. Tehran: Iran Textbook Publishing and Printing Company. 2013. [In Persian] [32] Saif, A. Novice developmental psychology: Psychology of learning and education. 2021; 5th ed. Tehran: Agah. [In Persian] [33] Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. Dual coding theory and education. Educational psychology review. 1991; 3(3): 149-210. [34] Salomon, G. Interaction of media, cognition, and learning: An exploration of how symbolic forms cultivate mental skills and affect knowledge acquisition. Routledge. 2012. [35] Mortazavi, P., Rahmaninezhad, N., Zarei Zavareh, A., Atashak, M., & Mohammad, A. Evaluation of e-learning content. Journal of Educational Technology. 2012; 6(4): 255-265. [In Persian] [36] Bagherian, M., Nasresfahani, A. R., & Ahanchian, M. R. Identification of desirable objectives indicators for humanities courses in universities and their attention. Research and Writing in Higher Education. 2020; 24(47): 225-254. [In Persian] [37] Eskandari, H. Theory and practice of educational media in the digital age. 2012; Tehran: Samt. [In Persian] [38] Beaudin, B. P., & Quick, D. Instructional video evaluation instrument. Journal of Extension. 1996; 34(3).‏ [39] Clark RC, Mayer RE. E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. john Wiley & sons. 2016; Mar 21. [40] Mayer, R.E., Fiorella, L. & Stull, A. Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Education Tech Research. 2020; 68: 837–852. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09749-6 [41] Mayer RE. Evidence-based principles for how to design effective instructional videos. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 2021; Jun 1;10(2):229-40. [42] Erickson, Carlton, W. H., & Curl, H. D. Fundamentals of Teaching with Audio Visual Technology. 1972. Znded, New York: Macmillan. [43] Fyfield M, Henderson M, Phillips M. 25 principles for effective instructional video design. ASCILITE Publications. 2019; 2(4): 18-23. [44] Brame, C. J. Effective educational videos: Principles and guidelines for maximizing student learning from video content. CBE—Life Sciences Education. 2016; 15(4), es6. https://www.lifescied.org/doi/full/10.1187/cbe.16-03-0125‎ [45] Münchow H, Mengelkamp C, Bannert M. The better you feel the better you learn: do warm colors and rounded shapes enhance learning outcomes in multimedia learning? Education Research International. 2017; Oct. [46] Heidig, S. Do Pedagogical Agents Facilitate Learner Motivation and Learning Outcomes?: The Role of the Appeal of Agent’s Appearance and Voice, Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications. 2010; 22(2): 84-97. http://DOI:10.1027/1864-1105/a000011 [47] Nourafrouz, R, Eslami, K, Mohammadsalemani, S, Izadpanah, M. Designing and Validating an Assessment Tool for Educational Videos in Medical Sciences. Journal of Education Development of Jundishapur Ahvaz. 2019; 10(3): 240-250. [In Persian] http://doi: 10.22118/edc.2019.99435 [48] Palis, A.G. and Quiros, P.A. Adult learning principles and presentation pearls. Middle East African Journal of Ophthalmology. 2014; 21(2): 114. [49] Moradi R, Mohamadi Mehr M, Nojoomi F, Khazaie A. The use of design patterns in the design and production of electronic content in e-learning environment. Nama Journal of Educational Studies. 2016; 7:41-52. [In Persian] [50] Henderson, M., Selwyn, N., & Aston, R. What works and why? Student perceptions of ‘useful digital technology in university teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education. 2015; 42(8): 1567-1579. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079.2015.1007946‎ [51] Mokhberian, M., & Nurani, S. M. R. Principles and standards for producing standard electronic educational software content for teachers. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress on Empowering the Society through Education in Social, Cultural, and Educational Studies. 2016: 1-7. Tehran. [52] Kimia Mannish, A. K. [Translation of Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches]. Creswell, J. W. (Author). Tehran: Jahad Daneshgahi Publications. 2005. [In Persian] [53] Qasem Pashovi, M. M. S., Abbasi-Zadeh, H., & Khodadri-Azar, H. (2014). An introduction to partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and its application in behavioral sciences with an introduction to related software. Urmia University Press. Iran.2014, [In Persian] [54] Golestan, V; Ezzati, I; Gadazger, S.R; Mardani, A; Azade Far, M.G; Aslani, M. The standard of training and learning packages. Textbook database. 2019: 141-158. [In Persian] [55] Münchow H, Mengelkamp C, Bannert M. The better you feel the better you learn: do warm colours and rounded shapes enhance learning outcome in multimedia learning?. Education Research International. 2017; Oct. [56] Plass JL, Heidig S, Hayward EO, Homer BD, Um E. Emotional design in multimedia learning: Effects of shape and color on affect and learning. Learning and Instruction. 2014; Feb 1; 29: 128-40. [57] Denning D. Video in theory and practice: Issues for classroom use and teacher video evaluation. Victoria: InNATURE productions. 1992.
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 243 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 183

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

پیوندهای مفید

اخبار و اعلانات

آمار

شناسایی و اعتباریابی معیارهای تولید فیلم و ویدئوی آموزشی برای دانش آموزان دوره ابتدایی