بررسی رابطه‌ی بین انواع حمایت اجتماعی با درگیرسازی تحصیلی از طریق نقش میانجی و تعدیل‌کنندگی اضطراب فناوری طی دوره کرونا

نورالهی, مصطفی; زنگنه, حسین; پورجمشیدی, مریم

doi:10.22061/tej.2024.9745.2895

نشریات مستقل دانشگاه در سامانه ارزیابی نشریات علمی وزارت علوم

نشریه معماری وشهرسازی پایدار موفق به اخذ رتبه علمی-پژوهشی شد

تعداد نشریات	13
تعداد شماره‌ها	200
تعداد مقالات	2,008
تعداد مشاهده مقاله	2,679,929
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله	1,937,260

	بررسی رابطه‌ی بین انواع حمایت اجتماعی با درگیرسازی تحصیلی از طریق نقش میانجی و تعدیل‌کنندگی اضطراب فناوری طی دوره کرونا
فناوری آموزش
مقاله 11، دوره 18، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 69، دی 1402، صفحه 191-212 اصل مقاله (1.09 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی-شماره انگلیسی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/tej.2024.9745.2895
نویسندگان
مصطفی نورالهی؛ حسین زنگنه^* ؛ مریم پورجمشیدی
گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران
تاریخ دریافت: 24 اردیبهشت 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 15 شهریور 1402، تاریخ پذیرش: 19 مهر 1402
چکیده
پیشینه و اهداف: تمام تلاش‌های نظام آموزشی در راستای موفقیت، پیشرفت تحصیلی و ایجاد یادگیری‌های عمیق و لذت بخش در دانش‌آموزان است. این امر بدون درگیر شدن دانش‌آموزان در فرآیند یادگیری امری غیرممکن است که نتیجه‌ای جز شکست و عدم موفقیت در پی نخواهد داشت. اما کمّیت و کیفیت درگیری تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان متأثر از عوامل گوناگون و مختلفی است که توجه و بررسی آن ها امری لازم و ضروری است. چنین ضرورتی با شیوع کووید 19 و آغاز آموزش‌های مجازی که همراه با افت تحصیلی و عدم‌ علاقه و لذت یادگیری در دانش‌آموزان بود بیش از گذشته آشکار شد. با بررسی و مطالعه عوامل تاثیرگذار بر درگیری تحصیلی می‌توان به حمایت معلمان، والدین و همکلاسی‌ها و همچنین فناوری‌های نوینی که امروزه جز جدایی ناپذیر جریان آموزش شده‌اند اشاره کرد که قادر هستند باعث ارتقا کمی و کیفی درگیری تحصیلی شوند؛ اما استفاده از فناوری‌ها نوین نیز، چالش‌های پیش روی خود را دارا بود. یکی از این چالش‌ها اضطراب فناوری بود. زمانی که دانش‌آموزان هنگام مواجه با فناوری‌ها، دچار اضطراب و ترس می‌شدند و لزوم حل چنین مشکلی اجتناب ناپذیر بود. لذا این پژوهش با هدف بررسی رابطه‌ی بین حمایت اجتماعی با میزان درگیرسازی تحصیلی یادگیرنده با نقش تعدیلگری و میانجی اضطراب فناوری انجام شد تا راهکارهای متفاوت و بروزی را ارائه کند که در چنین شرایطی نیز حمایت‌های اجتماعی اثرگذار باشند و در نتیجه شاهد موفقیت امر آموزش و یادگیری باشیم. روش‌ها‌: روش پژوهش کمّی و از نوع پیمایشی- همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری این پژوهش شامل 528 نفر (264 دختر و 264 پسر) دانش آموزان پایه هشتم متوسطه شهرستان فامنین بود که در سال تحصیلی 1401-1400 مشغول به تحصیل بودند. حجم نمونه بر اساس جدول کرجسی و مورگان 225 نفر و به روش خوشه‌ای تصادفی انتخاب گردید، اما به دلیل اطمینان بیشتر این نمونه به 402 نفر (221 دختر و181 پسر) تغییر یافت. ابزارهای پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه درگیرسازی تحصیلی ریو 2013، پرسشنامه حمایت اجتماعی دیمرای و مالکی 2002 و پرسشنامه‌ی اضطراب رایانه باندالوس و بنسون 1990 بود. روایی ابزاهای پژوهش بر اساس روایی همگرا و واگرا موردسنجش قرار گرفت. پایایی ابزارها نیز بر اساس آزمون آلفای کرونباخ، آزمون پایایی ترکیبی و آزمون اسپیرمن موردسنجش قرار گرفت و مدل ارائه شده و نتایج حاصل از طریق معادلات ساختاری و آزمون همبستگی اسپیرمن مورد بررسی قرار گرفت. یافته‌ها: نتایج معادلات ساختاری نشان داد که بین حمایت اجتماعی با میزان درگیرسازی تحصیلی یادگیرنده با نقش میانجی اضطراب فناوری رابطه معناداری وجود دارد و حمایت اجتماعی والدین، معلمان و همکلاسی‌ها نیز به صورت مستقیم و غیرمستقیم بر درگیرسازی تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان تاثیرگذار است. حمایت اجتماعی والدین، معلمان و همکلاسی‌ها که به صورت حمایت‌های ابزاری، اطلاعاتی، عاطفی و ارزیابی ارائه شدند در سه بخش ارتباط دهی با فناوری، موفقیت کار در فناوری و اطمینان و صمیمت در فناوری موجب کاهش اضطراب فناوری و افزایش درگیری تحصیلی دانش‌آموزان در چهار بعد درگیری رفتاری، شناختی، عاطفی و عاملی شد. همچنین این تاثیر به صورت مستقیم و بدون در نظر گرفتن اضطراب فناوری نیز صادق بود. نتیجه‌گیری: با توجه به نتایج پژوهش والدین، معلمان و همکلاسی‌ها با ارائه حمایت‌های لازم می‌توانند در حل مشکلات و چالش‌های پیش روی دانش‌آموزان نقشی مهم و اساسی ایفا کنند. به ویژه اگر این مشکلات و چالش‌ها در حوزه فناوری و کاربرد و استفاده آن در امر آموزش باشد. به همین دلیل سیاستگزاران و مسئولان آموزش و پرورش برای ارتقا کیفیت آموزش‌های مجازی نباید از این ظرفیت‌های بزرگ چشم پوشی کنند و با برنامه‌ها و طرح‌های لازم موجب تشویق والدین، معلمان و همکلاسی‌ها دانش‌آموزان گردند تا به ارائه حمایت‌های اجتماعی بیشتر روی آورند و کیفیت آموزش و یادگیری را بهبود بخشند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
حمایت اجتماعی؛ درگیری تحصیلی؛ اضطراب فناوری
موضوعات
فناوری آموزش- دوره متوسطه
عنوان مقاله [English]
Exploring the Relationship among Various Forms of Social Support, Academic Engagement, and Technology Anxiety amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: An investigation of mediation and moderation effects
نویسندگان [English]
M. Norollahi؛ H. Zangeneh؛ M. PourJamshidi
Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Human Sciences, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده [English]
Background and Objectives: The central objective of the educational system is to cultivate student success, promote academic progress, and foster meaningful and enjoyable learning experiences. Achieving these aims hinges significantly on student engagement in the learning process, as its absence may lead to academic failure and suboptimal outcomes. Numerous factors influence students' academic engagement quantity and quality, warranting thorough investigation. This need has been accentuated by the widespread implementation of virtual education during the COVID-19 pandemic, which has been associated with declining academic performance and reduced interest in learning among students. In response to this challenge, examining the factors that impact academic engagement, including the support provided by teachers, parents, and classmates, and integrating new technologies that have become integral to the educational landscape is essential. However, utilizing these new technologies also brings unique challenges, notably technology anxiety, wherein students may experience fear and apprehension when confronted with technology-related tasks. The present research explores the relationship between the type of social support and learners' level of academic engagement, considering the mediating and moderating role of technology anxiety. By elucidating such relationships, this study aims to propose innovative and contemporary solutions that effectively harness social support, ultimately ensuring educational success and fostering positive learning experiences amidst the complexities of modern education. Materials and Methods: The research adopted a quantitative and survey-correlation methodology. The statistical population comprises 528 eighth-grade high school students (264 girls and 264 boys) from Famnin City during the academic year 2021-2022. Initially determined as 225 individuals using Karajesi and Morgan's table and selected through random cluster sampling, the sample size was later increased to 402 participants (221 girls and 181 boys) to enhance generalizability. The research instruments consist of Reeve's 2013 Academic Engagement Questionnaire, Dimrai and Maleki's 2002 Social Support Questionnaire, and Bandalos and Benson's 1990 Computer Anxiety Questionnaire. Convergent and divergent validity assessed the items' validity, while Cronbach's alpha, combined reliability, and Spearman's tests measured item reliability. The presented model and results were analyzed using structural equations and Spearman's correlation test. Findings: The findings from the structural equations analysis indicate a significant relationship between social support and the extent of student academic engagement mediated by technology anxiety. The social support provided by parents, teachers, and classmates exhibits both direct and indirect effects on students' academic engagement. This support, comprising instrumental, informational, emotional, and evaluative aspects, positively influences students' engagement in various technological aspects, including communication, work success, confidence, and intimacy. Consequently, technology anxiety is reduced, increasing academic engagement across behavioral, cognitive, emotional, and causal dimensions. Furthermore, this positive effect remains evident even when not considering technology anxiety as a mediating factor. Conclusions: The research findings highlight the crucial and fundamental role of parents, teachers, and classmates in addressing students' challenges, particularly in the realm of technology and its application in education. These key stakeholders can provide essential support to students, facilitating the resolution of technological issues. Recognizing their significant impact, policymakers and educational authorities should harness these valuable resources to enhance the quality of online education. Implementing targeted programs and plans to encourage parents, teachers, and classmates to offer increased social support will ultimately improve the overall learning experience and academic engagement.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
Social Support, Academic Engagement, Technology Anxiety

مراجع
[1] Schnitzler K, Holzberger D, & Seidel T. All better than being disengaged: Student engagement patterns and their relations to academic self-concept and achievement. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2021; 36: 627-652.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00500-6 [2] Engels M.C, Spilt J, Denies K & Verschueren K. The role of affective teacher-student relationships in adolescents’ school engagement and achievement trajectories. Learning and Instruction. 2021; 75: 101485.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101485 [3] Haugan J. A, Frostad P & Mjaavatn P E. A longitudinal study of factors predicting students’ intentions to leave upper secondary school in Norway. Social Psychology of Education. 2019; 22: 1259-1279.‏ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11218-019-09527-0 [4] Wang MT, & Eccles JS. Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of research on adolescence. 2012; 22(1): 31-39.‏ https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x [5] Tabatabaee J, Sarfarazi E. Analysis of primary school students' academic failure with emphasis on the happy learning virtual program in the Corona pandemic. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences, 2023; 13(3): 49-67. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.22285318.1402.13.3.3.9 [6] Fredricks J A, Blumenfeld P C & Paris A H. School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of educational research. 2004; 74(1): 59-109.‏ https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.3102/00346543074001059 [7] Martínez I M, Youssef-Morgan C M, Chambel M J & Marques-Pinto A. Antecedents of academic performance of university students: Academic engagement and psychological capital resources. Educational Psychology. 2019; 39(8): 1047-1067.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1623382 [8] Fredricks J A. Academic engagement.‏ International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. 2015; 2(1).31-36. [9] Alrashidi O, Phan H P & Ngu B H. Academic engagement: an overview of its definitions, dimensions, and major conceptualizations. International Education Studies. 2016; 9(12): 41-52.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n12p41 [10] Appleton J, Christenson S L, Kim D & Reschly A L. Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the Student Engagement Instrument. Journal of school psychology. 2006; 44(5), 427-445.‏ https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.002 [11] Reeve J & Tseng M. Agency as a fourth aspect of student engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2011; 36, 257–267. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002 [12] Reeve J. How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of educational psychology. 2013; 105(3), 579.‏ https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0032690 [13] Bronfenbrenner U. Ecology of the family as a context for human development: Research perspectives. Developmental Psychology. 1986; 22(6), 723–742. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0012-1649.22.6.723 [14] Lam S F, Jimerson S, Kikas K, Cefai C H, Veiga F, Nelson B, Hatzichristou C, Polychroni F, Basnett J, Duck R, Farrell P, Liu Y, Negovan, V, Shin H, Stanculescu H, Wong B, Yang H, Zollneritsch J. Do girls and boys perceive themselves as equally engaged in school? The results of an international study from 12 countries. Journal of School Psychology. 2012; 50, 77-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.25115/ejrep.v19i53.3871 [15] Skinner E A & Pitzer J R. Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Handbook of research on student engagement. 2012; (pp. 21-44). Springer, Boston, MA.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2 [16] Cohen S. Social relationships and health. American psychologist. 2004; 59(8), 676.‏ https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.59.8.676 [17] Hsu J Y, Chen C C, Ting PF. Understanding MOOC continuance: An empirical Examination of social support theory. Interactive Learning Environments. 2018; 26(8), 1-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1446990 [18] Ursin P, Järvinen T & Pihlaja P. The Role of Academic Buoyancy and Social Support in Mediating Associations Between Academic Stress and School Engagement in Finnish Primary School Children. Journal of Educational Research. 2020; 65(4), 661-675. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1739135 [19] Nouwen W, Clycq N. The role of social support in fostering school engagement in urban schools characterised by high risk of early leaving from education and training. Social Psychology of Education. 2019; 22(5), 1215-1238. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11218-019-09521-6 [20] Moreira P A & Lee V E. School social organization influences adolescents' cognitive engagement with school: The role of school support for learning and of autonomy support. Learning and Individual Differences. 2020; 80, 101885.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2020.101885 [21] Chong W H, Liem D, Huan S, Kit P L & Ang R P. Student perceptions of self-efficacy and teacher support for learning in fostering youth competencies: Roles of affective and cognitive engagement. Journal of Adolescence. 2018; 68, 1-11.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.07.002 [22] Xerri M J, Radford K & Shacklock K. Student engagement in academic activities: a social support perspective. Higher education. 2018;75(4), 589-605.‏ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10734-017-0162-9 [23] Rautanen P, Soini T, Pietarinen J & Pyhältö K. Primary school students perceived social support in relation to study engagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education. 2021; 36(3), 653-672.‏ https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10212-020-00492-3 [24] Zhang H, Sun C, Liu X, Gong S, Yu Q & Zhou Z. Boys benefit more from teacher support: Effects of perceived teacher support on primary students’ creative thinking. Thinking skills and creativity. 2020; 37, 100680. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100680 ‏ [25] Brunsting N C, Zachry C, Liu J, Bryant R, Fang X, Wu S & Luo Z. Sources of perceived social support, social-emotional experiences, and psychological well-being of international students. The Journal of Experimental Education. 2021; 89(1), 95-111.‏ https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1080/00220973.2019.1639598 [26] Murray C, Kosty D & Hauser-McLean K. Social support and attachment to teachers: Relative importance and specificity among low-income children and youth of color. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2016; 34(2), 119–135. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0734282915592537 [27] Cohen S & Wills T. A. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin. 1985; 98(2), 310–357. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310 [28] Dobbins C & Denton P. My WallMate: An Investigation into the use of mobile technology in enhancing student engagement. TechTrends, 2017; 61(6), 541-549.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0188-y [29] Bray A & Tangney B. Enhancing student engagement through the affordances of mobile technology: a 21st century learning perspective on Realistic Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education Research Journal. 2016; 28(1), 173-197.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0158-7 [30] Schindler L A, Burkholder G J, Morad A & Marsh C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: a critical review of the literature. International journal of educational technology in higher education, 14(1), 1-28.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0 [31] Bond M, Bedenlier S. Facilitating Student Engagement Through Educational Technology: Towards a Conceptual Framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. 2019; 11(1), 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jime.528 [32] Olalere Yusuf M. Information and communication technology and education: Analysing the Nigerian national policy for information technology. International Education Journal. 2005; 6(3), 316-321. [33] Inan F A & Lowther D L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Education Technology Research and Development. 2021; 58, 137-154. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y [34] Zheng J & Li S. What drives students’ intention to use tablet computers: An extended technology acceptance model. International Journal of Educational Research. 2020; 102, 101612.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101612 [35] Celik V & Yesilyurt E. Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers & Education. 2013; 60(1), 148-158. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.008 [36] Abdullah F & Ward R. Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Computers in human behavior. 2016; 56, 238-256.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.11.036 [37] ‏Maricutoiu L P. A meta-analysis on the antecedents and consequences of computer anxiety. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 127, 311-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.262 [38] Zhou J & Yu H. Contribution of social support to home-quarantined Chinese college students’ well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of online learning self-efficacy and moderating role of anxiety. Social Psychology of Education. 2021; 24(6), 1643-1662.‏ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11218-021-09665-4 [40] Weinert C, Maier C, Laumer S & Weitzel T. Technostress mitigation: an experimental study of social support during a computer freeze. Journal of Business Economics. 2020; 90(8), 1199-1249. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11573-020-00986-y [41] Salas C, Parra V, Delgado F D, Olivares H. Influence of Teacher-Student Relationships and Special Educational Needs on Student Engagement and Disengagement: A Correlational study. Frontiers in Psychology. 2021; 12,1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708157 [42] Lee J C & Xiong L N. Investigation of the relationships among educational application (APP) quality, computer anxiety and student engagement. Online Information Review. 2022; 46(1), 182-203.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-08-2020-0348 [43] Zhou J & Yu H. Contribution of social support to home-quarantined Chinese college students’ well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of online learning self-efficacy and moderating role of anxiety. Social Psychology of Education. 2021; 24(6), 1643-1662.‏ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11218-021-09665-4 [44] Ramazani M, Khamesan A. Psychometric characteristics of Reeve’s academic engagement questionnaire 2013: with the introduction of the Agentic Engagement. Quarterly of Educational Measurement, 2017; 8(29): 185-204. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22054/jem.2018.22660.1555 [45] Malecki C K & Demaray M K. Weapon carrying and perceptions of social support in an urban middle school. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 2003; 11, 169-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/10634266030110030401 [46] KHAMESAN AHMAD ABOUTALEBI FATEME. Validation of Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale (CASSS2000). 2010; Research project of Birjand University. [In Persian] [47] Bandalos D & Benson J. Testing the factor structure invariance of a computer attitude scale over two grouping conditions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1990; 50(1), 49–60. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1177/0013164490501005 [48] ZAKI M. Testing and validating of the computer anxiety scale (cas) among male and female trainees of computer institutes in esfahan. Information and Communication Technology in Educational Sciences [Internet]. 2012;2(4 (8)):5-28. [In Persian] [49] Weinert, C., Laumer, S., Maier, C., & Weitzel, T. “The Effect of Coping Mechanisms on Technology Induced Stress: Towards a Conceptual Model.” Americas Conference on Information Systems (2013). [50] Reeve J, Jang H, Carrell D, Jeon S & Barch J. (2004). Enhancing Students’ Engagement by Increasing Teachers’ Autonomy Support. Motivation and Emotion, 28 (2), 147-169. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1023/B:MOEM.0000032312.95499.6f [51] Azadi Dehbidi F, Fooladchang M. Causal Model of Academic Engagement: The Role of Academic Support and Academic Self-Regulation. Journal of Instruction and Evaluation. 2019;12(47):159-183. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.30495/jinev.2019.670901 [52] Hejazi E, Ghazi Tabatabaei M, Gholamali Lavasani M, Moradi A. The Teachers-Student Relationship and School Engagement: Mediating Role of Basic Psychological Needs. Applied Psychological Research Quarterly. 2014, 5(1), 19-40. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/japr.2014.52541 [53] Ramazani M, Khāmesan A, Rāstgoumoghadam M. The relationship between the perceived social support from teacher and academic engagement: The mediating role of academic self-regulation. Educational Innovations, 2019; 17(4): 107-124. [In Persian] [54] Hassannia S, Sabzi N Causal Explanation of Academic Engagement Based on Academic Support and Students' Psychological Capital. Studies in Learning & Instruction. 2020; 12(1), 30-52. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22111/jeps.2022.6968 [55] Rezaaee Varmazyaar M A, Sadipoor E, Ebraahimi Ghavaam S, Delaavar A. The Effect of Perceived Social Support, Developmental and Psychological Capitals, and Psychological Well-Being on Academic Engagement: Testing a Conceptual Model. QJOE, 2021; 37 (2) :85-108. [In Persian] [56] Moltafet G, Taghvainia A, Ayool A. The Investigation of Relationship between Perception from Classroom and Academic Engagement with Mediator Role of Academic Motivation. Studies in Learning and Instruction. 2020; 11(2):115-134. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22099/jsli.2020.5569 [57] Wang MT & Eccles JS. School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction. 2013;28, 12-23.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.002 [58] Pan J, Zaff J, Donlan A. Social Support and Academic Engagement Among Reconnected Youth: Adverse Life Experiences as a Moderator. Journal of Research on Adolescence. 2017; 27 (4), 890-906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jora.12322 [59] Wilcox G, McQuay J, Blackstaffe A, Perry R, Hawe P. Supporting Academic Engagement in Boys and Girls. Journal of School Psychology. 2017; 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0829573517703239 [60] Gutiérrez M, Tomás J, Romero I, Barrica J M. Perceived Social Support, School Engagement and Satisfaction with School. Revista de Psicodidáctica. 2017;22 (2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2017.05.001 [61] Taghavi H, Ekhtiary F. Social Support and Student’ s Information Seeking Behavior: The Mediator Role of Academic Engagement. Journal of Academic Librarianship and Information Research. 2020;53(4):97-110. [In Persian] https://doi.org/10.22059/jlib.2020.299249.1473 [62] Elsaesser C, Heath RD, Kim JB & Bouris A. The long-term influence of social support on academic engagement among Latino adolescents: Analysis of between-person and within-person effects among Mexican and other Latino youth. Youth & Society. 2018; 50(8), 1123-1144.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X16656086 [63] Ansong D, Okumu M, Bowen GL, Walker AM, Eisensmith SR. The role of parent, classmate, and teacher support in student engagement: Evidence from Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development. 2017; 54, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2017.03.010 [64] Kiefer SM, Alley KM & Ellerbrock CR. Teacher and peer support for young adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and school belonging. RMIE Online. 2015;38(8), 1-18.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19404476.2015.11641184 [65] Rabbani Z, Talepasand S, Rahimianboogar E, Mohammadifar M. Relationship Between Classroom Social Context and Academic Engagement: The Mediation Roles of Self-System Processes, Academic Motivation and Emotions. Development Psychology, 2017; 14(53): 37-51. [In Persian] [66] Salimi A, Zangeneh H. [The effect of gamification on vocabulary learning (learning English as a second language) among the fifth-grade elementary school students]. Tech. Edu. J. 2022; 16(4): 723-734. http://dx.doi.org/10.22061/tej.2022.8550.2686 [67] Jafarei ShadPei M, Zangeneh H. [Designing and Developing a Multimedia to Instruct the Alphabet signs to First-grade Elementary Students (Turkish Language)]. Journal of Teaching Persian to Speakers of Other Languages. 2020; 9(19): 251-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.30479/jtpsol.2021.12872.1476 [68] Zangeneh H, Pourjamshidi M, Yenkimaleki M. [The Effectiveness of Digital Game-based Learning on Alphabet Signs and Word Learning in Persian to Non-Persian-Speaking Children. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ)]. 2023;24(3):212-231.
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 278 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 172

سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب

پیوندهای مفید

پیوندهای مفید

اخبار و اعلانات

آمار

بررسی رابطه‌ی بین انواع حمایت اجتماعی با درگیرسازی تحصیلی از طریق نقش میانجی و تعدیل‌کنندگی اضطراب فناوری طی دوره کرونا