تعداد نشریات | 11 |
تعداد شمارهها | 210 |
تعداد مقالات | 2,098 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 2,878,180 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,085,948 |
عوامل مؤثر در کاربرد ارزشیابی توصیفی از دیدگاه معلمان ابتدایی | ||
فناوری آموزش | ||
مقاله 5، دوره 6، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 24، مهر 1391، صفحه 267-276 اصل مقاله (1.07 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/tej.2012.196 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
عادل زاهدبابلان* 1؛ مهران فرج اللهی2؛ محمد همرنگ3 | ||
1دانشکده علومانسانی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی،اردبیل،ایران | ||
2دانشکده ادبیات و علومانسانی، دانشگاه پیام نور تهران،ایران | ||
3دانشکده ادبیات و علومانسانی، دانشگاه پیامنور تهران واحد ری،تهران،ایران | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 03 اسفند 1390، تاریخ بازنگری: 08 خرداد 1391، تاریخ پذیرش: 08 خرداد 1391 | ||
چکیده | ||
این پژوهش به منظور بررسی عوامل موثر در کاربرد ارزشیابی توصیفی از دیدگاه معلمان پایه دوم و سوم ابتدایی شهر اردبیل انجام شده است. روش تحقیق، توصیفی از نوع همبستگی بود. جامعه آماری پژوهش را معلمان پایه دوم و سوم ابتدایی شهر اردبیل که بنابر آمار 700 نفر (260 نفر در ناحیه یک و 440 نفر در ناحیه دو) تشکیل میداد. از این تعداد 300 نفر(150نفر مرد و 150 نفر زن) به طور تصادفی با استفاده از نمونه گیری خوشهای انتخاب شدند. اطلاعات مورد نیاز از طریق پرسشنامههای محقق ساخته از معلمان جمع آوری شد، روایی صوری پرسشنامه توسط متخصصان مورد تایید قرار گرفت و ضریب پایایی با استفاده از آلفای کرونباخ (91/0)به دست آمد. دادهها با استفاده از روشهای آمار توصیفی و استنباطی(تحلیل عاملی)تجزیه و تحلیل شد. نتایج تحلیل عاملی نشان داد که 5 عامل از نظر معلمان دارای بار عاملی هستند . از بین 5 عامل فوق عامل روانی بیشترین درصد کل واریانس را تبیین میکند(21%) و سپس عامل مدیریتی(19%)، آموزشی(17%)، فرایندی(7%) و فردی(4%) قادر به تبییین واریانس هستند. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
ارزشیابی؛ ارزشیابی کمی؛ ارزشیابی توصیفی؛ تحلیل عاملی | ||
موضوعات | ||
برنامه ریزی درسی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Effective Factors in Applying Descriptive Evaluation from Primary School Teachers’ Point of View | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
A. Zahed Babelan1؛ M. Farajollahi2؛ M. Hamrang3 | ||
1Faculty of Humanities, Mohaghegh Ardabili University, Ardabil, Iran | ||
2Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Uni. of Payame Noor,Tehran.Iran | ||
3Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Payam-e-Noor University, Tehran, Rey Branch, Tehran, Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
The present study attempted to investigate the effective factors in applying descriptive evaluation from Ardebil elementary schools second and third grade teachers’ point of view. The method was descriptive - correctional. The research population included 700 primary schools’ second and third grade teachers (260 teachers from the first district and 240 teachers from the second district). From this number, 300 teachers (150 male and 150 female) were randomly selected by cluster sampling. The data were collected through researcher – made questionnaires. The formal validity of the questionnaire was confirmed by the specialists in the field and the reliability was calculated by K –Alfa (0.91). The data were analyzed by descriptive – inferential statistics methods (factor analysis). The result of the factor analysis indicated that 5 factors were significant from the point of view of teachers. From these 5 factors, psychological factors justified the highest percentage of the whole variance (21%). The other 4 factors had the following percentage of justification of variance, respectively: managerial factor (19%), educational (17%), procedural (7%) , and individual factors(4%). | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Effective Factors in Applying Descriptive Evaluation from Primary School Teachers’ Point of View | ||
مراجع | ||
]1[ Rezaei M., Curriculum and Teaching Methods, Guidance and Counseling and Evaluation, In Essay Collections of Conference on Information Engineering In Education, Vol.4, The Institute of Education, 2004. [2] Mohammadi F., The Study of Descriptive Evaluation Effects on Self-Esteem of ThirdGrade Elementary School Students In Tehran, M.A. Thesis, School of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, 2005. ]3[ West R. and Creighton J., Examination Reform in Central and Eastern Europe, Issues and Trends Assessment in Education, Vol.1, No.2, 1999, pp.45-52. ]4[ Shepard L.A., The role of classroom Assessment in teaching and learning, center for study of Evaluation, standards and student testing, California university, 2000. ]5] Ahmadi H., Anthropological foundations of evaluation and revising existing system, A Collection of Academic Articles in the First Educaitonal Evaluation Conference, Tehran, Tazkyeh Publication, 2003. [6] Hassani M., Describe The Evaluation Plan, Tehran, Publisher of Contemporary Works, 2003. [7] Hossein Zadeh F., Pathology of Evaluation System of Students' Academic Achievements, Educational Research and Planning Organization, Tehran, 2001. [8] Bani-Asadi H., Introducing Design and Descriptive Evaluation, Tehran, Azmoon-ENovin, 2005. [9] Habibi F., Examining The Obstacles And Challenges Facing The Use of Descriptive Evaluation, Selected Papers of Ordibehesht Conference, Khorramabad, Education Office, Khorram Abad: Shapourkhast, 2008. [10] Hassani M. and Ahmadi H., The Survey of Qualitative-Descriptive Evaluation Tehran Elementary Schools, Journal of Educational Innovations, No.26, 2007, pp.86-122. [11] Abdi M., Descriptive Evaluation and Inclusive Training, Journal of Exceptional Education, No.97, 2009, pp.49-53. [12]Shaterlou A., Advantages of descriptive Evaluation in Inclusive Training, Journal of Exceptional Education, No.97, 2009, pp.60-67. [13] Khoshkholqh I. and Sharifi H.P. Reports of Experimental Performance of descriptive evaluation in primary schools of some parts of the country in academic year 84-85, Journal of Education No.88, 2006, pp.117-147. عادل زاهدبابالن و همکاران 276 نشریه علمی پژوهشی فناوری آموزش، سال ششم، جلد 6 ،شماره 4 ،پاییز 3113 [14]Namvar Y., The study of Efficacy Rate of Experimental Performing of DescriptiveQualities on Educational and Academic Performance of Elementary School Students in Ardabil, Ardabil Ministry of Education, 2008. [15] Zinni Vand M. and Rokhfard M., Descriptive Evaluation a Requirement for the Implementation of Inclusive Education, Journal of Exceptional Education, No.97, 2010, pp.60-67. [16] Mousavi S., Surveying parents and Managers of descriptive Assessment on the basis of detailed objectives of Project in academic year of 83-84, Qom Ministry of Education, 2005. [17] Abumohammadi M., Review of primary school teachers viewpoints about descriptive evaluation approach in Yazd province, B.A. Thesis, University of Yazd, 2005. [18] Amiri T., Effectiveness Evaluation of Descriptive evaluation Plan in the first, second and third-grade primary school students and its comparison with quantitative evaluation in Chahar-Mahale-Bakhtiari province, Educational Research Council in Education Office, 2006. [19] Farajollahi M. and Haghighi F., The role of Continuous assessment in deepening the secondgrade students' learning in Tehran, Journal of Education, No.92, 2005, pp.81-114. [20] Zarei E., The effects of Descriptive evaluation on creativity and learning participation and academic performance of third grade boys and girls in Bandar Abbas, Journal of Educational Sciences, Vol.8, No.2, 2009, pp.79-92. [21] Zamani Fard F. and et.al, elementary School teachers' descriptive Experiences from the objectives of descriptive evaluation project, Islamic Azad University, Isfahan, No.25, 2010, pp.38-52. [22] Mortezaei-Nejad E., The study of Teachers and parents viewpoints towards Application of descriptive evaluation in first, and second-grade Elementary classes in Tehran in academic year of 83-84, Islamic Azad University, Shahr-e-Rey Branch, 2005. [23] Katula A.S. and Sherrill C., Improving student motivation, parent communication and assessment while implementing a portfolio program, Master research project's aunt Xavier University, 1999. [24] Zaff j.f., Formative assessment: Does it work, Research Foundations for the Kaplan Achievement Planner, New York, Kaplan K12 Learning Services, 2003. [25] Sadler P.M. and Good E., The impact of selfand peer-grading on student learning, Educational Assessment, Vol.11, No.1, 2006, pp.1-31. [26] LokasA. and Murphy J. Middle school student perceptions of school climate, Examining protective function on subsequent adjustment problems, Learning Environments Journal, Vol.12, No.2, 2007, pp.85-99. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 2,496 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 2,517 |