|تعداد مشاهده مقاله||2,477,390|
|تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله||1,746,067|
|Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations (JECEI)|
|دوره 9، شماره 1، فروردین 2021، صفحه 11-24 اصل مقاله (1.9 M)|
|نوع مقاله: Original Research Paper|
|شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/jecei.2020.7455.394|
|Department of Telecommunication, Faculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.|
|تاریخ دریافت: 05 خرداد 1399، تاریخ بازنگری: 09 مهر 1399، تاریخ پذیرش: 13 آبان 1399|
|Background and Objectives: Target detection is one of the main applications of remote sensing. Multispectral (MS) images with higher spatial resolution than hyperspectral images are an important source for shape and geometric characterization, and so, MS target detection is interested.|
Methods: A target detector appropriate for multispectral (MS) images is selected among hyperspectral target detectors and redefined in this paper. Many target detectors have been proposed for hyperspectral images in the remote sensing filed. Most of these detectors just use the spectral information. Since, the MS images have higher spatial resolution compared to hyperspectral ones, it is proposed that select a target detector that uses both of the spectral and spatial features. To this end, the attribute profile based collaborative representation (AP-CR) hyperspectral detector is chosen for MS images. Shape structures extracted by flexible attribute filters can significantly improve the MS target detection.
Results: As a case study, the wheat fields in Chenaran County in Iran are chosen as targets to be detected. The image acquired by Landsat 8 is used for doing experiment. The results show the superior performance of AP-CR with 96.09 % accuracy for wheat detection using MS image of Landsat 8.
Conclusion: The high performance of AP-CR is due to extraction of flexible attribute characteristics and the use of collaborative representation for approximation of each image pixel. Although the AP-CR method provides the highest accuracy, it needs a high running time compared to other detectors.
|Target Detection؛ Multispectral Image؛ Wheat Field؛ Attribute Filter؛ Collaborative representation|
 S.W. Murphy, C.R.D.S. Filho, R. Wright, G. Sabatino, R.C. Pabon, “HOTMAP: Global hot target detection at moderate spatial resolution,” Rem. Sens. Environ., 177: 78-88, 2016.
 M. Imani, “Sparse and collaborative representation-based anomaly detection,” SIViP, 14: 1573–1581, 2020.
 T. Guo, F. Luo, L. Zhang, B. Zhang, X. Tan, X. Zhou, “Learning Structurally Incoherent Background and Target Dictionaries for Hyperspectral Target Detection,” IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens., 13: 3521-3533, 2020.
 U. Kanjir, H. Greidanus, K. Oštir, “Vessel detection and classification from spaceborne optical images: A literature survey,” Remote Sens. Environ., 207: 1-26, 2018.
 Y. Ma, J. Han, J. Liu, Y. Zhang, L. Bai, “A multi-scaled hierarchical structure model for multispectral image detection,” Signal Process. Image Commun., 47: 193-206, 2016.
 B. Melville, A. Fisher, A. Lucieer, “Ultra-high spatial resolution fractional vegetation cover from unmanned aerial multispectral imagery,” Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 78: 14-24, 2019.
 Z. Zhao, Y. Zhang, L. Bai, Y. Zhang, J. Han, “Multispectral target detection based on the space–spectrum structure constraint with the multi-scale hierarchical model,” Signal Process. Image Commun. 68: 58-67, 2018.
 F.C. Robey, D.R. Fuhrmann, E.J. Kelly, R. Nitzberg, “A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector,” IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst., 28(1): 208-216, 1992.
 F.A. Kruse et al., “The spectral image processing system (SIPS) interactive visualization and analysis of imaging spectrometer data,” Rem. Sens. Environ., 44(2): 145-163, 1993.
 L.L. Scharf, B. Friedlander, “Matched subspace detectors,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 42(8): 2146-2157, 1994.
 J.C. Harsanyi, C.I. Chang, “Hyperspectral image classification and dimensionality reduction: an orthogonal subspace projection approach,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 32(4): 779-785, 1994.
 C.-I. Chang, D.C. Heinz, “Constrained subpixel target detection for remotely sensed imagery,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 38(3): 1144-1159, 2000.
 S. Kraut, L.L. Scharf, L.T. McWhorter, “Adaptive subspace detectors,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 49(1): 1-16, 2001.
 Y. Chen, N.M. Nasrabadi, T.D. Tran, “Sparse representation for target detection in hyperspectral imagery,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process, 5(3): 629–640, 2011.
 M. Imani, “Difference based target detection using mahalanobis distance and spectral angle,” Int. J. Remote Sens., 40(3): 811-831, 2019.
 M. Imani, “Attribute profile based target detection using collaborative and sparse representation,” Neurocomputing, 313: 364–376, 2018.
 L. Zhang, L. Zhang, D. Tao, X. Huang, B. Du, “Hyperspectral remote sensing image subpixel target detection based on supervised metric learning,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 52(8): 4955-4965, 2014.
 Y. Dong, L. Zhang,L. Zhang, B. Du, “Maximum margin metric learning based target detection for hyperspectral images,” ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens., 108: 138-150, 2015.
 M. Imani, “RX anomaly detector with rectified background,” IEEE Geosci. Remote Sens. Lett., 14(8): 1313-1317, 2017.
 T. Zhang, Z. Peng, H. Wu, Y. He, C. Li, C. Yang, “Infrared small target detection via self-regularized weighted sparse model,” Neurocomputing, 420: 124-148, 2021.
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 400
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 362