پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 11 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 226 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,285 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,514,402 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,576,099 |
تبیین الگوهای طراحی محیط بیوفیلیک: مرور نظام‌مند مفاهیم و رویکردها | ||
| معماری و شهرسازی پایدار | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 12، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 23، تیر 1403، صفحه 41-66 اصل مقاله (2.29 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/jsaud.2024.10750.2215 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فاطمه بهبودزاده1؛ احمد اخلاصی* 2؛ سعید نوروزیان ملکی3 | ||
| 1کارشناس ارشد معماری، گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار، گروه معماری منظر، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 23 اسفند 1402، تاریخ بازنگری: 13 تیر 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 28 تیر 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقدمه: در طول دو دهه‌ای که از عمر طراحی بیوفیلیک در معماری می‌گذرد، دیدگاه‌های متعددی در زمینه الگوهای یک محیط بیوفیلیک ارائه شده است که تفاوت‌هایی با یکدیگر دارند. هدف از این پژوهش، تحلیل شباهت‌ها و تفاوت‌هایی است که در میان این دیدگاه‌ها وجود دارد. روش تحقیق: نوع پژوهش کیفی و گردآوری اطلاعات بر مبنای مطالعه منابع کتابخانه‌ای- اسنادی انجام گرفته است. کلیدواژه‌ها و مفاهیم اصلی از طریق تحلیل محتوای مطالب، استخراج شده و از طریق استدلال استقرایی و تطبیق میان آن‌ها نتایج به دست آمده است. در این تحقیق، دیدگاه‌های مختلف مطرح شده در زمینه الگوهای طراحی بیوفیلیک از طریق مرور نظام‌مند استخراج گردیده و 47 منبع نهایی مورد بررسی قرار گرفتند. نتایج و بحث: دیدگاه‌ها در 4 خوشه قابلیت جمع‌بندی داشتند و از میان آن‌ها خوشه غالب انتخاب شد. این خوشه از سه دسته‌بندی تجربه مستقیم طبیعت، تجربه غیرمستقیم طبیعت، تجربه فضا و مکان و 27 الگو تشکیل شده است. الگوهایی که از میانگین فراوانی دسته مربوطه، فراوانی بیشتری داشتند به عنوان الگوهای مهم شناسایی و برای هر یک از این الگوها راهکارهای طراحی ارائه شد. برخی از الگوهایی که مهمترند، عبارتند از سبزینگی، نور طبیعی، آب، اشکال و فرم‌های طبیعی، مصالح طبیعی و دورنما و پناهگاه. نتیجه‌گیری: برخی از راهکارهای طراحی ارائه شده با فراوانی بیشتر عبارتند از وارد کردن پوشش گیاهی به فضای داخلی از طریق دیوارهای سبز داخلی، آتریوم‌های بزرگ با محیط‌های شبیه پارک و بسترهای کاشت داخلی، گنجاندن گیاهان در ساختمان با استفاده از بام‌های سبز، دیوارها و نماهای سبز و فضاهای سبز جیبی، گسترش محیط آبی از طریق ساخت مناظر آبی همچون فواره‌ها، بدنه‌های آبی، تالاب‌ها و برکه‌های ساخته شده، دیوارهای آبی و آکواریوم‌ها، استفاده از هندسه فراکتال در طراحی‌ها، استفاده از مصالح طبیعی مانند چوب، سنگ، بامبو، خاک رس در طیف وسیعی از محصولات، مبلمان و دیگر طراحی‌های داخلی و خارجی و ارتباط جغرافیایی، تاریخی، اکولوژیکی و فرهنگی با مکان. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| "بیوفیلیا"؛ "معماری بیوفیلیک"؛ "ارتباط با طبیعت"؛ "محیط ترمیمی"؛ "سلامت جسمی و روانی" | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Explanation of Biophilic Design Patterns: A Systematic Review of Concepts and Approaches | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fateme Behboodzade1؛ Ahmad Ekhlassi2؛ Saeid Norouzian-Maleki3 | ||
| 1Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Department of Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Two decades after the emergence of biophilic design in architecture, various opinions with distinct patterns have been put forward. Accordingly, this study aimed to analyze the similarities and differences between the existing thoughts. In this qualitative study, the data were collected through library and documentary research. The keywords and main concepts were first extracted from the content analysis of the available literature and then compared to report the results with the help of inductive reasoning. Different opinions on the patterns of biophilic design were extracted through a systematic review of 47 records. The opinions were compiled into four clusters, from which the dominant cluster was selected. The cluster included three general categories: direct experience of nature, indirect experience of nature, and experience of space and place, and 27 patterns encompassing greenery, natural light, water, natural shapes and forms, natural materials, and prospect and refuge. Patterns with a higher frequency than the average frequency of their original category were identified as important patterns, for each of which a set of design strategies was proposed. Some of the widespread design strategies were integrating vegetation into interior spaces through the use of indoor green walls, large atriums with park-like environments, and interior planting beds; embedding plants into building designs through the implementation of green roofs; the installation of green walls and facades; and the inclusion of green pockets; expansion of water spaces in built environments and landscapes by incorporating decorative fountains, various water features, engineered wetlands, small ponds, cascading water walls, and aquarium displays; incorporating fractal geometry into design practices; the application of natural materials such as wood, bamboo, stone, and clay across a wide range of products, furniture, and various interior and exterior designs; and geographical, historical, ecological, and cultural connections to place. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Biophilia, Biophilic Architecture, Connection with nature, Restorative environment, Physical and psychological health | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
#Afifian, M., Keshmiri, H., Moztarzadeh , H., & Ziari , K. (2023). Evaluation of the Relationship between Biophilic Outdoor Elements of Residential Complexes and the Elderly’s Residential Satisfaction (Case Study: Residential complexes of Shiraz). Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design, 11(1), 215-234. [in Persian] Alaie, A., Yazdanfar, A., Hosseini, S.-B., & Norouzian-Maleki, S. (2020). A Framework for the Components of Social Sustainability in Housing Based on Content Analysis of Relevant Studies. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design, 8(2), 81-94. [in Persian] Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., & Silverstein, M. (1977). A Pattern Language. New York: Oxford University Press. Asim, F., & Shree, V. (2019). The impact of Biophilic Built Environment on Psychological Restoration within student hostels. Visions for Sustainability, 12, 18-33. Asim, F., Rai, S., & Shree, V. (2020). Biophilic Architecture for restoration and therapy within the built environment. Visions for Sustainability, 15, 53-79. Berto, R., & Barbiero, G. (2014). Mindful silence produces long lasting attentional performance in children. Visions for Sustainability, 2, 49-60. Berto, R., & Barbiero, G. (2017). The Biophilic Quality Index: A Tool to Improve a Building from “Green” to Restorative. Visions for Sustainability, 8, 38-45. Bolten, B., & Barbiero, G. (2020). Biophilic Design: How to enhance physical and psychological health and wellbeing in our built environments. Visions for Sustainability, 00, 01-04. Bolten, B., & Barbiero, G. (2023). Biophilic Design: Nine Ways to Enhance Physical and Psychological Health and Wellbeing in Our Built Environments. In S. Capolongo, M. Botta, & A. Rebecchi, Therapeutic Landscape Design: Methods, Design Strategies and New Scientific Approaches (pp. 13-19). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Browning, W. D., & Ryan, C. (2020). Nature Inside: A Biophilic Design Guide. London: RIBA Publishing. Browning, W., Kallianpurkar, N., Ryan, C., & Labruto, L. (Revised 2015). The Economics of Biophilia: Why Designing with Nature in Mind Makes Financial Sense. New York: Terrapin Bright Green, LLC, www.TerrapinBrightGreen.com. Browning, W., Ryan, C., & Clancy, J. (2014). 14 patterns of biophilic design: Improving Health & Well-Being in the Built Environment. new York: Terrapin Bright Green, LLC. Calabrese, E. F., & Dommert, A. (2019). Biophilia and the Practice of Biophilic Design. In R. Coles, S. Costa, & S. Watson, Pathways to Wellbeing in Design: Examples from the Arts, Humanities and the Built Environment (pp. 97-127). New York: Routledge. Cramer, J. S., & Browning, W. D. (2008). Transforming Building Practices Through Biophilic Design. In S. R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, & M. Mador, Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life (pp. 335-346). Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Derr, T., & Kellert, S. (2013). Making Children’s Environments “R.E.D.”: Restorative Environmental Design and Its Relationship to Sustainable Design. In Proceedings of the 44th annual conference of the environmental design research association. Downton, P., Jones, D., Zeunert, J., & Roös, P. (2017). Creating healthy places: railway stations, biophilic design and the Metro Tunnel Project. Geelong, Australia: Deakin University. Duzenli, T., Tarakci, E., & Akyol, D. (2017). Concept of Sustainability and Biophilic Design in Landscape Architecture. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 5, 43-49. Ebrahimpour, M. (2020). Proposing a Framework of Biophilic Design Principles in Hot and Arid Climate of Iran by Using Grounded Theory. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 16(1), 71-78. Esmailpoor, N., & Dehghanian, M. (2024). Systematic Review of the Factors and Consequences of Residential Mobility in Cities. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design, 11(2), 119-144. [in Persian] Frumkin, H. (2001). Beyond Toxicity: Human Health and the Natural Environment. American journal of preventive medicine, 20(3), 234-240. Heerwagen, J. H., & Gregory, B. (2008). Biophilia and Sensory Aesthetics. In S. R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, & M. Mador, Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life (pp. 227-241). Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Heerwagen, J., & Hase, B. (2001). Building Biophilia: Connecting People to Nature in Building Design. Environmental Design and Construction, 3, 30-36. Hildebrand, G. (2008). Biophilic Architectural Space. In S. R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, & M. Mador, Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life (pp. 263-275). Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Hung, S. H., & Chang, C. Y. (2021). Health benefits of evidence-based biophilic-designed environments: A review. Journal of People, Plants, and Environment, 24(1), 1-16. Jiang, B., Song, Y., Li, H. X., Lau, S. S.-Y., & Lei, Q. (2020). Incorporating biophilic criteria into green building rating tools: Case study of Green Mark and LEED. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 82, 106380. Kellert, S. R. (2004). Beyond LEED: From Low Environmental Impact to Restorative Environmental Design. Keynote Address, Greening Rooftops for Sustainable Communities Conference. Kellert, S. R. (2005). Building for Life: Designing and Understanding the Human-Nature Connection. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press. Kellert, S. R. (2008). Dimensions, Elements, and Attributes of Biophilic Design. In S. R. Kellert, J. Heerwagen, & M. Mador, Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life (pp. 3-19). Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kellert, S. R. (2018). Nature by Design: The Practice of Biophilic Design. Yale University Press. Kellert, S. R., & Calabrese, E. (2015). The Practice of Biophilic Design. www.biophilic-design.com. Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Island Press. Lee, E. J., & Park, S. J. (2022). Biophilic Experience-Based Residential Hybrid Framework. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 8512. Mohamed, D. S. (2021). Biophilic design impact on Healthcare facilities interior design in Egypt. Journal of Design Sciences and Applied Arts, 2(1), 60-70. Mollazadeh, M., & Zhu, Y. (2021). Application of Virtual Environments for Biophilic Design: A Critical Review. Buildings, 11(4), 148. Ryan, C. O., Browning, W., Clancy, J., Andrews, S., & Kallianpurkar, N. (2014). Biophilic Design Patterns: Emerging Nature-Based Parameters for Health and Well-Being in the Built Environment. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 8(2), 62-76. Ryan, C., & Browning, W. (2018). Biophilic Design. In R. M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Sustainability Science and Technology (pp. 1-44). New York, NY, USA: Springer. Salingaros, N. A. (2015). Biophilia & Healing Environments: Healthy Principles for Designing the Built World. New York: Terrapin Bright Green, LLC. Salingaros, N. A. (2019). The Biophilic Healing Index Predicts Effects of the Built Environment on Our Wellbeing. Journal of Biourbanism, 8(1), 13-34. Salingaros, N. A. (2020). Neuroscience Experiments to Verify The Geometry of Healing Environments: Proposing a Biophilic Healing Index of Design and Architecture. In J. B. Hollander, & A. Sussman, Urban Experience and Design: Contemporary Perspectives on Improving the Public Realm (pp. 58-72). New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis group. Söderlund, J. (2019). The Emergence of Biophilic Design. cham, Switzerland : Springer. TBG, T. B. (2012). the economics of biophilia: Why designing with nature in mind makes financial sense. New York: Terrapin Bright Green, LLC, www.terrapinbrightgreen.com. Wilson, A. (2008). Biophilia in Practice: Buildings That Connect People with Nature. In S. R. Kellert, J. H. Heerwagen, & M. L. Mador, Biophilic Design: The Theory, Science, and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life (pp. 325-333). Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Xue, F., Gou, Z., Lau, S. S.-Y., Lau, S.-K., Chung, K.-H., & Zhang, J. (2019a). From biophilic design to biophilic urbanism: Stakeholders’ perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 211, 1444-1452. Xue, F., Lau, S. S., Gou, Z., Song, Y., & Jiang, B. (2019b). Incorporating biophilia into green building rating tools for promoting health and wellbeing. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 76, 98-112. Yao, M. (2003). The Natural Environment and Human Health: Epidemiological Evaluations of Case Studies on Biophilia and Green Design. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies. Yeang, K. (2008). Ecoskyscrapers and Ecomimesis: New tall building typologies, CTBUH 8th World Congress. Yin, J., Arfaei, N., MacNaughton, P., Catalano, P. J., Allen, J. G., & Spengler, J. D. (2019). Effects of Biophilic Interventions in Office on Stress Reaction and Cognitive Function: A Randomized Crossover Study in Virtual Reality. Indoor Air, 29(6), 1028-1039. Yin, J., Yuan, J., Arfaei, N., Catalano, P., Allen, J., & Spengler, J. (2020). Effects of biophilic indoor environment on stress and anxiety recovery: A between-subjects experiment in virtual reality. Environment International, 136, 105427. Yin, J., Zhu, S., MacNaughton, P., Allen, J. G., & Spengler, J. D. (2018). Physiological and Cognitive Performance of Exposure to Biophilic Indoor Environment. Building and Environment, 132, 255-262. Zhong, W., Schroder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114-141. Zhong, W., Schroeder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2023). Designing with nature: Advancing three-dimensional green spaces in architecture through frameworks for biophilic design and sustainability. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12 , 732-753.# | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 863 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 999 |
||