پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 11 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 228 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,321 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,656,253 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,686,061 |
تحلیلی بر عوامل تبیینکنندهی حس مکان در بافتهای تاریخی (مورد پژوهی: شهر تبریز) | ||
| معماری و شهرسازی پایدار | ||
| دوره 10، شماره 2، مهر 1401، صفحه 95-106 اصل مقاله (1.67 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/jsaud.2022.8440.1969 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سیدجواد حبیبزاده کوزهکنانی1؛ اکبر عبداللهزاده طرف* 2؛ حسن ستاری ساربانقلی3؛ محمدرضا پاکدل فرد4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری گروه شهرسازی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار گروه شهرسازی، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار گروه معماری، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران. | ||
| 4استادیار گروه معماری، واحد تبریز، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 08 مهر 1400، تاریخ بازنگری: 05 فروردین 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 16 خرداد 1401 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| بافت تاریخی شهرها آثار گرانبهایی از فرهنگ، دانش معماری و شهرسازی بومیاند و برخلاف پیشینه درخشان، امروزه با مشکلات متعدد ناشی از بیهویتی شهر معاصر روبهرو هستند که زندگی شهری را از جنبههای متعالی معنوی تهی کرده است. در این راستا، بررسی حس مکان در این بافتها که پیوند انسان با مکان و ارتقاء ارزشها، نگرشها و بهویژه رفتار فردی و اجتماعی را موجب میشود، ضرورتی اجتنابناپذیر است. با توجه به اهمیت موضوع، هدف از تحقیق حاضر بررسی عوامل تبیینکننده حس مکان در بافتهای تاریخی شهر تبریز و شناخت وضعیت موجود است. بدین منظور، روش تحقیق کمی-کیفی با هدف کاربردی و ماهیت تحلیلی-اکتشافی بوده که بهمنظور تجزیه و تحلیل دادهها از مدل معادلات ساختاری در نرمافزار Amos و آزمون T-test در نرمافزار SPSS استفاده شده است. شایان ذکر است که جامعهی آماری تحقیق شامل ساکنان بافت تاریخی شهر تبریز (منطقه 8 شهرداری) میباشد که حجم نمونه با استفاده از مدل کوکران 384 نفر تعیین شده است. یافتههای تحقیق نشان میدهد که مهمترین عوامل تبیینکننده حس مکان در بافت تاریخی شهر تبریز به ترتیب مؤلفههای فضایی-عملکردی، ادراکی-معنایی و کالبدی-فیزیکی با ارزش 68/0، 51/0 و 46/0 بوده است. همچنین نتایج حاکی از آن است که با توجه به سطوح حس مکان در بافت تاریخی شهر تبریز، ادراک و احساس مادی و عینی و تا حدودی اقدام رفتارهای فردی یعنی حضور، استقرار و تعلق به مکان (سطوح اولیه حس مکان) تحقق یافته و ادراک و احساس فراعینی و ذهنی یعنی دلبستگی و تعهد به مکان (سطوح نهایی حس مکان) تحقق نیافته است. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| مکان؛ حس مکان؛ بافت تاریخی؛ شهر تبریز | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| An Analysis of the Factors Explaining the Sense of Place in Historical Textures (Case Study: Tabriz) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Seyed javad Habibzadeh kouzekonani1؛ Akbar Abdollahzade Taraf2؛ Hasan Sattari Sarbangholi3؛ M. Pakdel Fard4 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student of Urban Designing, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Prof., Department of Urbanism, Tabriz branch, Islamic Azad Uni., Tabriz, Iran . | ||
| 3Assistant Prof., Department of Architecture, Tabriz branch, Islamic Azad Uni., Tabriz, Iran | ||
| 4Assistant professor, Department of Architecture, Tabriz branch, Islamic Azad Univ., Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The historical texture of cities are precious works of indigenous culture, architectural knowledge and urban planning, and despite their brilliant background, nowadays they face numerous problems due to the anonymity of the contemporary city, which has deprived urban life of transcendent spiritual aspects. In this regard, the study of the sense of place in these textures, which causes human connection with place and the promotion of values, attitudes, and especially individual and social behavior, is an inevitable necessity. Due to the importance of the subject, the purpose of this study is to investigate the factors explaining the sense of place in the historical textures of Tabriz and to identify the current situation. For this purpose, the research method in the present study is quantitative-qualitative with an applied purpose and analytical-exploratory nature which in order to analyze the data, have been used the structural equation model in Amos software and the t-test in SPSS software. It is noteworthy that the research community includes residents of the historical texture of the city of Tabriz (District 8 of the municipality) that the sample size was determined using the Cochran model of 384 people. Findings show that the most important factors explaining the sense of place in the historical urban texture of Tabriz were spatial-functional, perceptual-semantic and physical-physical components with values of 0.68, 0.51 and 0.46, respectively. The results also indicate that according to the levels of sense of place in the historical texture of Tabriz, the perception and material and objective feeling and to some extent the action of individual behaviors, ie presence, establishment and belonging to the place (basic levels of sense of place) is realized and perceived, transcendental and subjective feeling, ie attachment and commitment to the place (final levels of the sense of place) has not been realized. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| place, sense of place, historical texture, Tabriz | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Altman, I., & Low, Setha M. (1992). Place attachment. (3th Ed). New York: Plenum Press. Bazi, K., Mirzapour, S., & Afrasyabirad, M. S. (2014). Spatial and locative Consequences of a place sense of belonging in to place in Khorramabad districts. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design, 2(2), 1-13. Carmona, M., & Tiesdell, S. (2007). Urban Design Reader. Architectural Press, Oxford. Carmona, M. (2006). Public Places, Urban Spaces. Architectural press, Elsevier, Oxford. Chaskin, R., Khare, A., & Joseph, M. (2012). Participation, deliberation, and decision making: The dynamics of inclusion and exclusion in mixed-income developments. Urban Affairs Review, 48(6), 863–906. Cohen, N. (2017). Moving Places: Relations, Return and Belonging. Emotion, Space and Society, 25, 1-2. Erfani, G. (2020). Sense of place as an investigative method for the evaluation of participatory urban redevelopment. Cities, 99, 1-12. Falahat, M. S. (2006). The concept of sense of place and its shaping factors. Honarhay-E-Ziba, 26, 57-66. Freestone, R., & Liu, E. (2016). Place and Placelessness revisited. New York: Routledge. Ghiasi, H., & Sarrafi Ghohar, E. (2016). Intertextual relationship of sence of place with an emphasis on originality cities urban restoration and valuation tissue. Urban Management, 45, 147-170. Giddens, A. (1991). Structuration theory: Past, present and future. In C. G. A. Bryant, & D. Jary (Eds.). Giddens' theory of structuration: A critical appreciation. London: Routledge. Gorgul, E., Luo, L., Wei, S. D., & Pei, C. (2017). Sense of place or sense of belonging? Developing guidelines for human-centered outdoor spaces in China that citizens can be proud of. Procedia Engineering 198, 517– 524. Hosseinabadi, S., Salmanimoghaddam, M., & Nori Dashtban, M. (2019). Spatial identity and its effective factors in old neighborhoods Study sample: Sabzevar Pergola neighborhood. Spatial planning, 9(34), 89-110. Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore Owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 233–248. Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2006). A comparative analysis of predictors of sense of place dimensions: Attachment to, dependence on, and identification with lakeshore properties. Journal of Environmental Management, 79(3), 316–327. King, R. (1995). Migrations, globalisation and place. In: Massey, D., Jess, P. (Eds.), A Place in theWorld? Places, Cultures and Globalization. Open University Press, Milton Keynes, pp. 5e44. Lee, T. H., & Shen, Y. L. (2013). The Influence of Leisure Involvement and Place Attachment on Destination Loyalty: Evidence from Recreationists Walking Their Dogs in Urban Parks. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 33 (3), 76- 85. Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come in the last 40 years? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31, 207-230. Madgin, R., Bradley, L., & Annette H. (2016). Connecting Physical and Social Dimensions of Place Attachment: What Can We Learn from Attachment to Urban Recreational Spaces? Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 31 (4), 677-693. Manzo, L. C., & Devine-Wright, P. (2013). Place attachment: Advances in theory, methods and applications. London: Routledge. Manzo, L. C., & Perkins, D. D. (2006). Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20(4), 335–350. McCunn, L. J., & Gifford, R. (2018). Spatial navigation and place imageability in sense of place. Cities, 74, 208–218. Mirgholami, M., & Ayasham, M. (2016). A conceptual model to evaluate the sense of place using four factors of perceptual, physical, social and functional (the Case study of Imam Street in Urmia, Iran). Urban Studies, 5(19), 69-80. Mullendore, N. D., Ulrich-Schad, J. D., & Prokopy, L. S. (2015). US farmers’ sense of place and its relation to conservation behavior. Landscape and Urban Planning, 140, 67–75. Novin, A, R. (2017). Analysis of Effects Revitalizationhistorical – cultural context of metropolises on city tourism development (Case Study: historical - cultural context of Tabriz metropolitan). Phd thesis in Geography and urban planning, Supervisor: Karim Hosseinzade Dalir, Islamic Azad University - Marand Branch. Payton, M. A., Fulton, D. C., & Anderson, D. H. (2005). Influence of place attachment and trust on civic action: A study at Sherburne national wildlife refuge. Society & Natural Resources, 18(6), 511–528. Qazimi, S. (2014). Sense of place and place identity. European Journal of Social Sciences Education and Research, 1(1), 306-310. Rabbani, R. (2018). Urban Sociology. Tehran: Samt Publications. Relph, E. (1976). Place and Placelessness, Pion, London. Relph, E. (2009). A Pragmatic Sense of Place. Environmental & Architectural Phenomenology, Kansas State University, Architecture Department, 20 (6), 8-19. Sarayi, M. H. Oshnoyi, A., & Rosta, M. (2016). Evaluation of spatial belonging indicators of the inhabitants of the old part of Kashan. Geography and environmental planning, 27(62), 17-34. Sarmast, B. (2010). Investigating the role of "city scale" in the sense of belonging to the place (Case study: Tehran). Urban Management, 26, 133-146. Schulz, C. (2008). Existence, Space and Architecture. London: Praeger Publishers. Seamon, D., & Sowers, J. (2008). Place and Placelessness. (1976): Edward Relph. Key Texts in Human Geography, London: Sage, 43-51. Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of Place: An Empirical Measurement. Geoforum, 22(3), 347-358. Sheikhi, M., Amini, S., & Nazemi, A. (2015). A comparative study of the sense of spatial belonging in formal and non-toxic settlements (Case study: Parand and Nasimshahr new city). Social Sciences, 69, 45-73. Stedman, R. C. (2003). Is it really just a social contruction? The contribution of the physical environment to sense of place. Society and Natural Resources, 16, 671-685. Taher Tolodel, M. S., Mahdinezhad, J., & Sadat, S. A. (2020). The Effect of Mental, Behavioral and Physical Factors of Sense of Place on Residential Satisfaction. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Urban Design, 8(1), 165-182. Tuan, Y. F. (1975). Place: An experiential perspective. Geographical Review, 65(2), 151–165. Tuan, Y. F. (1977). Topohilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values. New York: Columbia University Press. Vertovec, S. (2009). Transnationalism. Routledge, London. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 939 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 915 |
||