تعداد نشریات | 11 |
تعداد شمارهها | 207 |
تعداد مقالات | 2,062 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 2,781,717 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,010,559 |
مشارکت عمومی در برنامهریزی و طراحی پروژه های زیرساختی | ||
معماری و شهرسازی پایدار | ||
دوره 10، شماره 2، مهر 1401، صفحه 17-40 اصل مقاله (1.65 M) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/jsaud.2022.8592.1990 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
سید محمد مهدی حسینی1؛ یوسف گرجی مهلبانی* 2؛ رضا سامه3؛ محمدصابر باقریان4 | ||
1دانشجوی دکتری، دانشگاه بینالمللی امام خمینی(ره)، قزوین، ایران. | ||
2استاد معماری، دانشگاه بین المللی دانشگاه امام خمینی قزوین، قزوین، ایران. | ||
3استادیار گروه معماری، دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه بین المللی امام خمینی، قزوین، ایران | ||
4استادیار معماری، دانشگاه بینالمللی امام خمینی(ره)، قزوین، ایران. | ||
تاریخ دریافت: 21 آبان 1400، تاریخ بازنگری: 04 فروردین 1401، تاریخ پذیرش: 03 خرداد 1401 | ||
چکیده | ||
مشارکت عمومی به معنای مداخله معنادار و اثرگذار جامعه ذینفع در فرآیند تصمیمگیری با هدف اتخاذ تصمیماتی است که از جانب عموم از حمایت بیشتری برخوردار باشد. احداث و یا توسعه زیرساختها یکی از مهمترین و بارزترین مصادیق مشارکت عمومی در سالیان گذشته بوده است. در بسیاری از ساختارهای حکومتی بنا بر قوانین دولتی و یا سازمانی اجرای مشارکت عمومی الزامی شده است و بر این مبنا تجارب بسیاری نیز شکل گرفته است. در این مقاله تلاش شده است ضمن ارائهی یک الگوی نظری برای ارزیابی ساختارهای مشارکت عمومی در حوزه احداث و یا توسعه زیرساختها، تجارب مشارکت عمومی در این حوزه در سه ساختار متفاوت شامل کمیسیون انرژی کالیفرنیا، هیات بازرسی برنامهریزی دولت انگلیس و پروژههای تحت حمایت بانکهای EBRD و ADB بررسی شوند. اطلاعات لازم در خصوص جزئیات فرآیند اجرایی هر یک از نمونهها از منابع بایگانی شده از آرشیو مربوط به همان پروژه اقتباس گشته و سعی شده است ضمن مطالعه بستر قانونی که این فرآیند در آن شکل گرفته است با مطالعه رویدادها، مکاتبات و گفتوگوهای صورت گرفته تدابیر و اقدامات مؤثر بکار گرفته شده در هر فرآیند شناسایی تا از نتایج آن در اصلاح ساختارهای موجود و یا تدوین مشارکت عمومی در مکان های فاقد تجربه استفاده شود. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
مشارکت عمومی؛ برنامهریزی و طراحی؛ زیرساخت؛ رضایت مردمی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Public Participation in Planning and Design of Infrastructure Projects | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Seied Mohammad Mahdi Hoseini1؛ Yousef Gorji Mahlabani2؛ Reza Sameh3؛ Mohammad Saber Bagheryan4 | ||
1MA. of Architecture in Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International Uni. Qazvin, Iran. | ||
2Prof. of Architecture in Department of Architecture and Urbanism,, Imam Khomeini International Uni. Qazvin, Iran. | ||
3Assistant Prof. of Architecture in Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International Uni. Qazvin, Iran. | ||
4Assistant Prof. of Architecture in Department of Architecture and Urbanism, Imam Khomeini International Uni. Qazvin, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Public participation means meaningful and effective involvement of stakeholders in decision making to get public to be more supportive. Over the past years, the construction or development of infrastructure projects is one of the most important and obvious examples of public participation and this issue has become a necessity in many government structures according to their laws. In this article, attempts were made to evaluate the examples of public participation experiences in this field in three different structures includes California Energy Commission, Planning INSpectorate & international. First, the necessary information about the details of the implementation process of each sample was extracted from the archived sources related to the same project. Afterwards, efforts were dedicated to assessing and comparing the implementation of the identification process based on the understanding perceived from other structures in addition to studying the legal context in which this process was formed through reviewing events, correspondence and conversations. In the current research, we identified the execution model of each structure and listed the measures taken to improve the public participation process in each of the mentioned structures to be used in the implementation of the existing structures or development of a process of public participation in inexperienced contexts. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Public participationt, Planning &, Design, Infrastructure, Public acceptance | ||
مراجع | ||
Alehashemi, A., Mansouri, S., Barati, N. (2017). Urban infrastructures and the necessity of changing their definition and planning Landscape infrastructure; a new concept for urban infrastructures in 21st. century. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-e Nazar, 13(43), 5-18 [in Persian] Arlidge, W. and Others (2018). A Global Mitigation Hierarchy for Nature Conservation, Bioscience, 68(5): 336–347. Arnstein, S. (1969). Ladder of Citizen Participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4): 216-224. Asian Development Bank (2009). Safeguard Policy statement, accessed via https://www.adb.org/documents/safeguard-policy-statement, Retrieved March 2020. Bahrainy, S. & Maknoon, R. (2001). Sustainable development: From Ideas to Actions. Journal of Environmental Studies, 27(27) [in Persian] Boyte, H.C. (2004). Everyday Politics: Reconnecting Citizens and Public Life. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. California Energy Commission (2014). Energy Commission PowerPoint Presentation for Alamitos power plant Informational hearing, Accessed via http://Ca.gov.ir, Docket number: 13-AFC-01, Retrieved January 2020. Creighton, J. (2005). The Public Participation Handbook: Making Better Decisions through Citizen Involvement, San Francisco (USA): Jossey-Bass.Doloi, H. (2012). Assessing Stakeholders’ Influence on Social Performance of Infrastructure Projects, Facilities, 30(11/12): 531-550.Doloi, H. (2014). A Framework for Supporting Planning and Development of Infrastructure Projects from a Societal Perspective, ISARC2014, Sydney, Australia.Drax power limited (2018). Drax Repower Project Consultation Report, Accessed Via https://infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/, Retrieved March 2020. Ducsik, D. (1981). Citizen Participation in Power Plant Siting Aladdin's Lamp or Pandora's Box? Journal of the American Planning Association, 47(2), 154-166.EBRD (2019). Environmental and Social Policy, Accessed Via https://www.ebrd.com/news/ publications/policies/environmental-and-social-policy-esp.html, Retrieved 2020. EDF Energy (2010). Hinkley Point C: Initial Proposals and Options Summary Document, accessed via https://www.edfenergy.com/file/2115/download, Retrieved 2016. EPA (n.d). Public Participation Guide: Introduction to Public Participation, Accessed Via https://www.epa.gov/international-cooperation/public-participation-guide-introduction-public-participation, Retrieved 2020European Commission (1998). Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, Accessed via https://ec.europa.eu/environment/aarhus, Retrieved 2021.Fung, A. & Wright, E.O. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered local governance. Politics and Society, 29, 5-41 International Association for Public Participation (IAP2), (2007). IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation. Thornton, CO: International Association for Public Participation. Accessed via http://iap2.affiniscape.com/associations/4748/files/IAP2%20Spectrum_vertical.pdf Jacob, C., Pioch, S. & Thorin, S. (2016). The Effectiveness of the Mitigation Hierarchy in Environmental Impact Studies on Marine Ecosystems: A Case Study in France, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 60(c): 83-98. National Infrastructure Planning (n.d). The Process, Accessed Via https:// infrastructure.planninginspectorate.gov.uk/application-process/the-process, Retrieved 2020. National Research Council (2008). Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press Ng, T., Li, T. & Wong, J. (2012). Rethinking Public Participation in Infrastructure Projects, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Municipal Engineer, 165(2), 101-113.Offenbacker, B. & Springer, S. (2008). Painting the Landscape: A Cross-Cultural Exploration of Public Government Decision Making. A joint research project by the International Association for Public Participation and The Charles F. Kettering Foundation, Louisville: IAP2 Petts, J. & Leach, B. (2000). Evaluating Methods for Public Participation: literature Review, Bristol: UK Environment Agency Accessed via https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/evaluating-methods-for-public-participation-literature-review, Retrieved 2021. Rowe, G. & Fewer, L. (2000). Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 25(1), 3–29. Salzmann, O., Steger, U. & Ionescu-Somers, A. (2005), Quantifying Economic Effects of Corporate Sustainability Initiatives – Activities and Drivers, International Institute for Management Development, Geneva. Scolobig, A., Bayer, J., Cascini, L. & Ferlisi, S. (2011). Design and Testing: A Risk Communication Strategy and a Deliberative Process for Choosing a Set of Mitigation and Prevention Measures. Deliverable 5.7, FP7 SafeLand Project - Living with Landslide Risk in Europe, WP 5.2 Shepherd, R. & Pryke, S. (2014). Regional Rail Planning, A Study of the Importance of Steering and Pragmatism in Stakeholder Networks, European Management, 32(4), 616–624.The planning Inspectorate (2016). Advice Note 8.5 - The Examination: Hearings and Site Inspections (Version 3), Accessed via official PINS Website, Retrieved 2018. Tuler, S. & Webler, T. (1999). Voices from the Forest: What Participants Expect of a Public Participation Process, Society & Natural Resources: An International Journal, 12:5, 437-453 Warren-Acquits act (1974). State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Act, cal. stat, §25222. Webler, T. & Tuler, S. (2006). Four Perspectives on Public Participation Process in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making: Combined Results from 10 Case Studies, The Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 34, No. 4 Webler, T. & Tuler, S. (2008). Organizing a Deliberative Participatory Process: What Does Communication and Governance Reform the Science Say? in: Governance Reform Under Real-World Conditions: Citizens, Stakeholders, and Voice. Washington, DC: World Bank. Webler, T. (1995). “Right” Discourse in Citizen Participation: An Evaluative Yardstick. In: Renn O., Webler, T. & Wiedemann, P. (eds) Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation. Technology, Risk, and Society (An International Series in Risk Analysis), Dordrecht: Kluwer. Webler, T., & Tuler, S. (2021). Four Decades of Public Participation in Risk Decision Making. Risk Analysis: an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis, 41(3), 503–518. World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Accessed via https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/5987our-common-future.pdf Wouters, M., Hardie-Boys, N., & Wilson, C. (2011). Evaluating Public Input in National Park Management Plan, Wellington, New Zealand: Publishing Team. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 475 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 436 |