پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 13 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 200 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,008 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 2,679,645 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 1,936,956 |
تحلیل شاخص های عینی و ذهنی کیفیت زندگی در مکان‌های شهری با روش ارزیابی یکپارچه در محله شتربان شهرتبریز | ||
| معماری و شهرسازی پایدار | ||
| دوره 9، شماره 2، آبان 1400، صفحه 132-113 اصل مقاله (1.8 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/jsaud.2021.7705.1850 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| اسلام کرمی* 1؛ علی زینالی عظیم2؛ مصطفی بصیری3؛ راحله عبدالهی4 | ||
| 1استادیار، دانشکده مهندسی معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه صنعتی شاهرود، شاهرود، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار گروه شهرسازی و معماری، عضو باشگاه پژوهشگران و نخبگان جوان، واحد تبریز دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تبریز، ایران. | ||
| 3استادیار گروه شهرسازی و معماری، واحد ایلخچی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ایلخچی، ایران | ||
| 4استادیار، گروه معماری، واحد ممقان، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، ممقان، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 26 دی 1399، تاریخ بازنگری: 20 اردیبهشت 1400، تاریخ پذیرش: 21 تیر 1400 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| کیفیت زندگی شهری (QoUL) یک مؤلفه مهم رضایت از شرایط کلی زندگی و تابعی از سطح نیازهای انسانی است و پیامدهای گسترده ای در سطح شهرها و محلات شهری دارد. کیفیت ذهنی زندگی شهری از ویژگیهای عینی محیط شهری ناشی می شود. از این‌رو هدف تحقیق حاضر بررسی سطح کیفیت زندگی شهری با روش ارزیابی یکپارچه و تلفیقی شاخص‌های عینی-ذهنی براساس میزان رضایتمندی از تحقق نیازها می باشد. روش تحقیق بصورت توصیفی- تحلیلی و پیمایشی می باشد. حجم نمونه برابر 378 نفر از جمعیت شتربان می باشد که از طریق فرمول کوکران بدست آمده است. در این مطالعه روشی که برای ارزیابی کیفیت زندگی در اماکن شهری به کار گرفته شده است بر مبنای لحاظ کردن نیازهای اساسی ساکنین در محله شتربان شهر تبریز می باشد که برگرفته از الگوی توسعه در مقیاس انسانی (HDS) مکس-نیف است. چون کیفیت زندگی شهری یک مفهوم چندوجهی است و از این نظر باید با استفاده از یک رویکرد یکپارچه، به‌طور کامل موردمطالعه قرار گیرد. تجزیه و تحلیل اطلاعات با نرم افزار SPSS انجام شد. در نتیجه با ارزیابی یکپارچه کیفیت زندگی در محله شتربان تبریز مشخص شد که سطح رضایت از 6 شاخص از 10 شاخص بکارگرفته شده در سطحی متوسط (50 درصد) و بالاتر از آن می باشد. 4 شاخص دیگر نزدیک و پایینتر از سطح متوسط (50 درصد) رضایت می باشد که در نهایت امتیاز کلی ارزیابی یکپارچه برابر با 51/52 درصد نشان داد سطح رضایت از کیفیت زندگی شهری در محله شتربان تبریز در سطح متوسطی قرار دارد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| کیفیت زندگی شهری"؛ شاخص عینی"؛ شاخص ذهنی"؛ توسعه در مقیاس انسانی"؛ "؛ محله شتربان" | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Analysis of objective and subjective indicators of quality of life in urban places with integrated evaluation method in Shotorban neighborhood of Tabriz City | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Islam Karami1؛ Ali Zeynali Azim2؛ Mostafa basiri3؛ Raheleh Abdollahi4 | ||
| 1Assistant Pro, Faculty of Architectural Engineering and Urbanism, Shahroud University of Technology(SUT), Shahroood, Iran. Islamkarami@shahroodut.ac.ir | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Urban Planning and Architecture, Member of Young Researchers and Elites Club, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran. | ||
| 3Urban Planning and Architecture, Ilkhchi Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ilkhchi, Iran | ||
| 4Assistant Professor, Department of Architecture, Mamaghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Mamaghan, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Quality of urban life (QoUL) is an important component of satisfaction with the general living conditions and has wide consequences in cities. The mental quality of urban life arises from the objective characteristics of urban environment. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate the level of quality of urba life with an integrated assessment method of objective-subjective indicators based on the level of satisfaction with the fulfillment of needs. The research method is descriptive-analytical and survey. The sample size is equal to 378 people of Shterban population, which is obtained through Cochran's formula. In this paper, the method used to assess the quality of life in urban areas is based on taking into account the basic needs of residents in the Shotorban neighborhood of Tabriz, which is derived from the Max-Nef Human Development Scale model. Because the quality of urban life is a multifaceted concept and in this regard should be thoroughly studied using an integrated approach. Data analysis was performed with SPSS software. As a result, with the integrated assessment of quality of life in Shotorban neighborhood, it was found that the level of satisfaction is 6 out of 10 indicators used at an average level (50%) and above. 4 indicators are close to and below the average level (50%) of satisfaction, which in the end, the overall score of the integrated assessment was equal to (52.51%), which shows that the level of satisfaction with the quality of life in Shotorban neighborhood is at a moderate level. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Quality of Urban life", objective index", subjective index", .", Human-scale development", ", Shotorban Neighborhood" | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadiania, M., & Ferreirab, S. (2019). Environmental amenities and quality of life across the united states, Ecological economics, 164, 106341. Alborz, A. (2017). The nature of quality of life: A conceptual model to inform assessment. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities. 14(1), 15-30. Amanpour, S., Daman bagh, S., & Azarbarzin, N. (2016). An analysis of the role of environmental components in the life quality of citizens (Case study: district 7 of Ahvaz), Geography, civil engineering and urban management studies, 2 (4), 1-23. [In Persian] Aminian, L. (2019). Modelling and measuring quality of urban life: housing, neighbourhood, transport and job. Eindhoven: Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. Bahraini, S. H., Ali Ghaleh Babakhani, M., & Sameh, R. (2015). Clarifying the nature of the “urban quality of life”: An approach in the urban design theories, architecture and urban planning of Armanshahr, 7(13), 151-167. [In Persian] Biagi, B., Ladu, M. G., & Meleddu, M. (2018). Urban quality of life and capabilities: An experimental study. Ecological economics, 150, 137–152. Bowling, A. (1997). Measuring Health: A review of quality of life measurement scales. Main head. Open university press. Brand-Correa, L. I., & Steinberger, J. K. (2017). A framework for decoupling human need satisfaction from energy use. Ecological economics, 141, 43-52. Chen, S., Cerin, E., Stimson, R., & Lai, P. C. (2016). An objective measure to assessing urban quality of life based on land use characteristics. Procedia environmental sciences, 36, 50–53. Costanzo, R. (2007). Quality of life: An approach integrating opportunities, human needs and subjective well-being, Ecological economics, 61(2-3), 267-276. Çubukçu, E., & Erin, I. (2016). Indicators of quality of life to compare neighborhood units and regional areas: A model to collect data in Turkish cities, 2nd AQoL2015Izmir, E-BPJ, 1(2), 205-213. Cummins, R. A. (2005). Moving from the quality of life concept to a theory. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 49(10), 699–706. Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Oishi, S. (2018). Advances and Open Questions in the Science of Subjective Well-Being. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 15. Diener, E., and Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: economic, social and subjective indicators. Social indicators research 40-1. El Din, H. S., Shalaby, A., Farouh, H. E., & Elariane, S. A. (2013). Principles of urban quality of life for a neighborhood. Hbrc Journal, 9(1), 86-92.
Elkhouly, A.N., Attia, S.A., & Zayed, M.A. (2019). Quality of urban life indexes’ analysis to initiate socio-urban based criteria, International journal of engineering research and technology, 12(12). 2273-2283. Genoveva, V.A., & Camporro, A.S.C. (2020). A Holistic Approach for Measuring Quality of Life in “La Condesa” Neighbourhood in Mexico City, ALCEA. Haslauer, E., Delmelle, E. C., Keul, A., Blaschke, T., & Prinz, T. (2014). Comparing Subjective and Objective Quality of Life Criteria: A Case Study of Green Space and Public Transport in Vienna, Austria. Social Indicators Research, 124(3), 911–927. Kazemi Khabiri, Kh, Shokouhi. M. A, Kharazmi, O.A, & Bemanian, M.R, (2018). Evaluation of quality of urban life with emphasis on health; A case study in Mashhad city. Environmental Health Engineering and Management Journal, 5(1), 57–60. Kazemzadeh, A., Neisany Samany, N., Darvishi Boloorani, A., Toomanian, A., & Pourahmad, A. (2018). Assessment of the quality of urban life using remote sensing and GIS. Scientific- Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR), 27(107), 113-132. [In Persian] Low, C.-T., Stimson, R., Chen, S., Cerin, E., Wong, P. P.-Y., & Lai, P.-C. (2017). Personal and neighbourhood indicators of quality of urban life: A case study of Hong Kong. Social indicators research, 136(2), 751–773. Macke, J., Casagrande, R. M., Sarate, J. A. R., & Silva, K. A. (2018). Smart city and quality of life: Citizens’ perception in a Brazilian case study. Journal of cleaner production, 182, 717–726. Mandič, S. (1999). Stanovanje, kakovost življenja in spremembe v zadnjem desetletju. Družboslovne razprave15, 30-31. Marans, R. W. (2015). Quality of urban life & environmental sustainability studies: Future linkage opportunities. Habitat international, 45, 47–52. Marans, R.W., and Stimson, R. (2011). An overview of quality of urban life. Investigating quality of urban life. Theory, methods and empirical research. New York. Marans, R.W. (2015). Quality of urban life & environmental sustainability studies: Future linkage opportunities. Habitat international, 45, 47-52. Marsousi, N., Farhudi, R., Lajevardi, A. (2015). The cultural and social qualiy of life in Iran’s cities. Journal of Urban ecology researches, 6(12), 79-94. [In Persian] Max-Neef, M. A. (1991). Human scale development: conception, application and further reflections. McCrea, R., Shyy, T.-K., & Stimson, R. (2006). What is the strength of the link between objective and subjective indicators of urban quality of life? Applied research in quality of life, 1(1), 79-96. Merschdorf, H., Hodgson M.E., & Blaschke, T. (2020). Modeling quality of urban life using a geospatial approach urban sci. 4(5). Meshkini, A., Habibi, K., Rahimi Kakejob, A., & Abdi, M. (2016). Comparative analysis of quality of life in old and new quarters, Zafarieh and Qatarchian Quarters, Sanandaj. Human geography research, 48(2), 263-276. [In Persian] Mittal, S., Chadchan. J., & Mishra, S.K. (2019). Review of Concepts, Tools and Indices for the Assessment of Urban Quality of Life, Social Indicators Research, 8. Mohit, M.A. (2013). Quality of life in natural and built environment – An introductory analysis. Procedia social and behavioral sciences, 101, 33–43. Moro, M., Brereton, F., Ferreira, S., & Clinch, J. P. (2008). Ranking quality of life using subjective well-being data, Ecological economics, 65(3). Morris, E. A. (2019). Do cities or suburbs offer higher quality of life? Intrametropolitan location, activity patterns, access, and subjective well-being. Cities, 89, 228–242. Murgaš, F., & Klobučník, M. (2018). Quality of life in the city, quality of urban life or well-being in the city: Conceptualization and case study. Ekológia (Bratislava), 37(2), 183–200. Murgaš, F., & Drápela, E. (2019). Quality of urban life in socially excluded communities of liberec region, International journal of community well-being, 2(4). Musa, H. D., Yacob, M. R., & Abdullah, A. M. (2018). Delphi exploration of subjective well-being indicators for strategic urban planning towards sustainable development in Malaysia. Journal of urban management. Naghsh-e-Moheet Consulting Engineers. (2013). Comprehensive Development plan of Tabriz, First Edition. [In Persian] Nanor M.A, Adarkwa, K.K, Poku-Boansi, M. (2018). A subjective measurement of the determinants of quality of life in Kumasi, 10(1), 212- 242.
Pour Ahmad, A., Ghorbani, R., Farhadi, E., & Doorudinia, A. (2017). A comparative evaluation of life quality in residential neighborhoods, (case study: Kamyaran city). Geographical urban planning research (GUPR), 4(4), 519-548. . [In Persian] Rahspar Tolouei, G., Habib, F., & Zarabadi, Z. (2019). Measurement of quality of life in Narmak neighborhood of Tehran based on the extended model of City Prosperity Index (CPI-QL). Haft Hesar J Environ Stud. 8 (29): 65-76. [In Persian] Rinner, C. (2007). A geographic visualization approach to multi-criteria evaluation of urban quality of life, International journal geographic information science, 21(8). Serag El Din, H., Shalaby, A., Farouh, H. E., & Elariane, S. A. (2013). Principles of urban quality of life for a neighborhood. HBRC Journal, 9(1), 86–92. Sirgy, M.J., Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighboorhood features affect quality of life. Social indicators research 59. Skevington, S. M., & Böhnke, J. R. (2018). How is subjective well-being related to quality of life? Do we need two concepts and both measures? Social Science & Medicine, 206, 22–30. Talmage C.A., Hagen, B., Pijawka, D., Nassar, C. (2019). Measuring neighborhood quality of life: Placed-based sustainability indicators in freiburg, Germany, Urban Sci. 2, 106. Tiran J. (2016). Measuring urban quality of life: Case study of Ljubljana. Acta geographica Slovenica, 56(1), 57–73. UN DESA. (2018). Revision of world urbanization prospects. Von Wirth, T., Grêt-Regamey, A., & Stauffacher, M. (2014). Mediating effects between objective and subjective indicators of urban quality of Life: Testing Specific Models for Safety and Access. Social Indicators Research, 122(1), 189–210. Zayyanu, M. (2016). Improving quality of life through community-based participatory development in Nigeria: explanatory factors for success and failure. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 222:151–159. Zayyanu, M., Abubakar, I. R. (2019). Improving the quality of life of urban communities in developing countries. Responsible consumption and production, 1–14. Zayyanu, M., Johar, F., Z, U. J, Majid, R.M. (2018). Measuring improvement in quality of life in community-based development projects in Nigeria, Asian journal of quality of life (AjQoL), 3(11) .81-92. Ziari, K., and Rafiee Mehr, H. (2015). Assessment of the factors affecting quality of life in informal settlements, (Case Study: Hesar, Hamedan). Human Geography Research, 47(1), 21-32. [In Persian] | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 843 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 478 |
||