دانشگاه تربیت دبیر شهید رجائی

  اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات13
تعداد شماره‌ها200
تعداد مقالات2,008
تعداد مشاهده مقاله2,680,109
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله1,937,339
Nourollah, A., Behzadpour, N.. (1397). Robot Arm Reconfiguration to Minimization Moving Parts. فناوری آموزش, 6(2), 235-249. doi: 10.22061/jecei.2019.5231.204
A. Nourollah; N. Behzadpour. "Robot Arm Reconfiguration to Minimization Moving Parts". فناوری آموزش, 6, 2, 1397, 235-249. doi: 10.22061/jecei.2019.5231.204
Nourollah, A., Behzadpour, N.. (1397). 'Robot Arm Reconfiguration to Minimization Moving Parts', فناوری آموزش, 6(2), pp. 235-249. doi: 10.22061/jecei.2019.5231.204
Nourollah, A., Behzadpour, N.. Robot Arm Reconfiguration to Minimization Moving Parts. فناوری آموزش, 1397; 6(2): 235-249. doi: 10.22061/jecei.2019.5231.204

Robot Arm Reconfiguration to Minimization Moving Parts

Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering Innovations (JECEI)
مقاله 11، دوره 6، شماره 2، مهر 2018، صفحه 235-249    اصل مقاله (1.88 M)
نوع مقاله: Original Research Paper
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/jecei.2019.5231.204
نویسندگان
A. Nourollah* ؛ N. Behzadpour
Shahid Rajaee Teacher Training University
تاریخ دریافت: 17 مرداد 1396،  تاریخ بازنگری: 19 آذر 1396،  تاریخ پذیرش: 26 اسفند 1396 
چکیده
Background and Objectives: This paper presents a new optimization problem in the field of linkage reconfiguration. This is the problem of minimizing moving parts of a given robot arm for positioning the end effector of the given robot arm at the given target point as well as minimizing the movement of the movable parts.
Methods: Initially, formal modeling is accomplished by minimizing the movement problem. At this time, a criterion called AM (Arithmetic Measure) is introduced, and this criterion is used to quantify the motion of the linkage. Afterward, it is indicated that the presented problem is an NP-Hard problem. Consequently, a greedy heuristic algorithm is presented to minimize the movement of the robot's moving components. After identifying the moving components and the movement of these parts, an algorithm is provided to determine the final configuration of the robot arm.
Results: The results indicate that the discussed model successfully reduced the moving parts of the robot arm. Moreover, the results show that the proposed approach fulfills the goal of minimization of the linkage components. Furthermore, this method leads to erosion of arm, reduces energy consumption and the required parameters and variables for calculating the final configuration of the linkages.
Conclusion: The mentioned algorithm solves the problem by mapping the robot arm with an arbitrary number of links to a robot with a single link or two links. The proposed heuristic approach requires O(n2) time using O(n) space.


======================================================================================================
Copyrights
©2018 The author(s). This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, as long as the original authors and source are cited. No permission is required from the authors or the publishers.
======================================================================================================
کلیدواژه‌ها
Formal Modeling؛ Robot arm؛ Linkage Reconfiguration؛ Reachability Problem؛ Computational Geometry
مراجع
[1] “All on robots,” [Accessed 02 08 2016].

[2] B. Wanlund‎, “Robots and automation – sage business researcher,”.

[3] J. J‎. ‎Craig, “Path Generation," in Introduction To Robotics, First, Ed., Boston, ‎Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., 257-269, 1989.

[4] L. Guibas, "Motion Modeling," in Discrete and Computational Geometry, 2nd ed., Chapman & Hall/CRC,: 1114-1132, 2004.

[5] R. Connelly, J. O’Rourke, “Linkages," in Geometric Folding Algorithms, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 9-11, 2007.

[6] S. L. Devadoss, J. O'Rourke, "Configuration Spaces," in Discrete and Computational Geometry, Princeton, University Press: 215-219, 2011.

[7] K. Shin, N. McKay, “A dynamic programming approach to trajectory planning of robotic,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 31(6): 491-500, 1986.

[8] Wu‎, ‎Z. Shi‎, ‎Y. Li‎, ‎M. Wu‎, ‎Y. Guan‎, ‎J. Zhang‎, ‎H. Wei, “Formal kinematic analysis of a general 6r manipulator using the screw theory,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015(2): 1-7, 2015.

[9] Y. Kouskoulas‎, ‎A. Platzer‎, ‎P. Kazanzides, “Formal Methods for Robotic System Control Software,” Johns Hopkins APL Technical Digest, 32(2): 490-498, 2013.

[10] T. Chettibi, H. E. Lehtihet, M. Haddad, S. Hanchi, “Minimum cost trajectory planning for industrial robots,” European Journal of Mechanics A/Solids, 23(4): 703–715, 2004.

[11] J. Choi, E. Amir, “Factor-guided motion planning for a robot arm," presented at the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, San Diego, CA, USA, 2007.

[12] Y. Zhang‎, ‎X. Lv‎, ‎Z. Li‎, ‎Z. Yang‎, ‎K. Chen, “Repetitive motion planning of pa10 robot am subject to joint physical limits and using lvi-based primal–dual neural network,” Mechatronics, 18(9): 475-485, 2008.

[13] H. Ding‎, ‎M. Zhou‎, ‎ O. Stursberg, “Optimal motion planning for robotic manipulators with dynamic obstacles using mixed-integer linear programming,” presented at the Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation, Makedonia Palace, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2009.

[14] F. L. Traversa, C. Ramella, F. Bonani, M. Ventra, “Memcomputing np-complete problems in polynomial time using polynomial resources and collective states,” Science Advances, 1(6): 1-9, 2015.

[15] A. Nourollah, M. R. Razzazi, “Minimum cost open chain reconfiguration,” Discrete Applied Mathematics, 159: 1418-1424, 2011.

[16] A. Nourollah, M. R. Razzazi, “A linear time approximation algorithm for ruler folding problem,” Journal of Universal Computer Science, 14(4): 566-574, 2008.

[17] A. Nourollah, M. R. Razzazi, “Near-optimum folding for a reconfigurable,” Advanced Robotics, 23(1-2): 239-256, 2009.

[18] R. Connelly, E. Demaine, “Geometry and topology of polygonal linkages,” Discrete and Computational Geometry: 213-235, 2004.

[19] J. Hopcroft, J. O’Rourke, S. Whitesides, “On the movement of robot arms in 2-dimensional bounded regions,” SIAM J. Computer, 14(2): 315-333, 1985.

[20] E. D. Demain, J. O’Rourke, “Geometric and folding algorithms: Linkages, Origami, Polyhedra,”Cambridge, University Press: 9-11, 29-31,59-67, 2007.

[21] A. Lieutier, J. Rameau, “Mechanical linkage design and NP-hardness,” Mechanism and Machine Theory, 82: 97-114, 2014.

[22] G. Panina, D. Siersma, “Motion planning and control of a planar polygonal linkage,” Journal of Symbolic Computation, 88: 5 -20, 2018.

[23] C. Haasea, S. Kiefer, “The complexity of the kth largest subset problem and related problems,” Information Processing Letters, 116(2): 111-115, 2016.

آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 621
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 475


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب