پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 11 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 227 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,309 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,582,439 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,622,040 |
مقایسه دبیران مدارس هوشمند و عادی از نظر صلاحیتهای تدریس مبتنی بر فناوری | ||
| فناوری آموزش | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 11، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 41، دی 1395، صفحه 63-72 اصل مقاله (1.61 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/tej.2016.610 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| فرهاد سراجی* ؛ معصومه رستمی | ||
| گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 15 تیر 1395، تاریخ بازنگری: 12 بهمن 1395، تاریخ پذیرش: 04 اسفند 1395 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف پژوهش حاضر مقایسة صلاحیتهای تدریس مبتنی بر فناوری در دبیران متوسطه هوشمند و عادی شهر همدان بود. روش پژوهش توصیفی از نوع پیمایشی و جامعة آماری آن 437 دبیر زن دورة اول متوسطة شهر همدان در سال تحصیلی 94-1393 بود. با استفادة از روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای و بر اساس جدول کرجسی و مورگان 103 نفر مدارس هوشمند و 102 نفر از مدارس عادی به‌عنوان نمونه انتخاب شد. ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها پرسشنامة محقق ساخته سیوشش گویهای بود و بر اساس مقیاس پنج‌درجه‌ای لیکرت تنظیم گردید که در تهیة آن از پرسشنامههای شاهین(2011)، لیو، زنگ و ونگ (2015) و جمشیدزاده (1393) استفاده شد. روایی محتوایی پرسشنامه با اعمال نظرات هشت نفر از متخصصان فناوری اطلاعات و تعلیموتربیت به دست آمد و میزان پایایی آن با استفاده از آلفای کرونباخ 82/0 محاسبه شد. داده‌های به‌دست‌آمده با استفاده از شاخص‌های آمار توصیفی مانند: فراوانی، میانگین، انحراف استاندارد، جدول و نمودار و آمار استنباطی مانندt تکنمونهای و t مستقل استفاده شد. تحلیل یافته‌ها نشان داد، معلمان مدارس هوشمند از نظر دانش شناختی 34/6T = ، نگرشی 74/6 T =، مهارتی و عملکردی 34/6 T = و خودکارآمدی رایانهای 42/4T = در سطح معنی‌داری کمتر از یک‌صدم نسبت به معلمان مدارس عادی در سطح بالاتری قرار داشتند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| فناوری اطلاعات و ارتباطات؛ مدارس هوشمند؛ معلمان؛ صلاحیتهای تدریس مبتنی بر فناوری؛ دورة متوسطة اول | ||
| موضوعات | ||
| شایستگی حرفه ای معلمان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Comparison of ICT based teaching competencies in smart and traditional schools teachers | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| F. Seraji؛ M. Rostami | ||
| Department of Educational Science, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, BuAli Sina University. Hamedan. Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The main goal of this study was to Comparison of Teachers’ Familiarity rate with Technology- Based Teaching Competencies in Smart and Traditional Schools in hamedan in academic year of 2014-2015 and used Survey research method. From (N=437) female teachers based on random stratified sampling 103 female teachers in smart schools and 102 female teachers is traditional schools were selected. For data collecting, a researcher-made questionnaire with 33 items based on Likert scale (5 = strongly agree, 4 = agree, 3 = average, 2 = disagree, 1= completely disagree) was set. The tool content validity was achieved by the opinion of eight experts in educational technology, and its validity according to Cronbach’s alpha was determined.82. Data obtained by descriptive and inferential statistics indicates that the smart school teachers’ familiar level with Technology- Based Teaching Competencies outperformed the teachers in traditional schools. Also smart school teachers, in terms of cognitive knowledge t=6/34, skills t=6/74, emotional t=6/34 and self-efficacy t=4/42, dominated the traditional school teachers. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Information Technology, Smart school, Teachers, Teaching competencies according to technology, First high school period | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
[1] Gu, X., Zhu, Y., and Guo, X ., Meeting the “Digital Natives”: Understanding the Acceptance of Technology in Classrooms, Educational Technology & Society, Vol. 16, No.1, pp. 392–402, (2013),. [2] Jimoyiannis, A., Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers’ professional development. Computers & Education, Vol.55, No. 3, pp.1259–1269, (2010). [3] Guzman, A., and Nussbaum, M., Teaching competencies for technology integration in the classroom. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 25, No.5, pp.453–469, (2009), [4] Ertmer, P. A., and Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, Vol. 42, No.3, pp. 255–284, (2010). [5] Angeli, C., and Valanides, N., Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK), Computers & Education, Vol. 52, No. 1, pp.154–168, (2009). [6]Romeo, Geoff., Lloyd, Margaret M., and Downes, Toni., Teaching Teachers for the Future (TTF): building the ICT in education capacity of the next generation of teachers in Australia, Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 28,No. 6, pp. 949-964, (2012). [7] Koehler, M. J., and Mishra, P., What is technological pedagogical content knowledge? Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 60-70, (2009). [8] Doering, A., Veletsianos, G., Scharber, C., and Miller, C., Using the technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge framework to design online learning environments and professional development, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 41,No. 3, pp. 319–346, (2009). [9] Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Cox, M., Knezek, D., and Brummelhuis, A., Under which conditions does ICT have a positive effect on teaching and learning? A call to action. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 4–14, (2013). [10] Groff, J., and Mouza, C., A framework for addressing challenges to classroom technology use, AACE Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 21-46, (2008). [11] ChanLin L-J., Hong J-C., Horng J-S., Chang S-H., and Chu H-C., Factors influencing technology integration in teaching: a Taiwanese perspective, Innovations in Education and Teaching International Vol. 43, pp. 57–68, (2006). [12] Ertmer, P. A., Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration, Educational Technology Research & Development, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 25–39, (2005). [13] Lim. C.P., Effective integration of ICT in Singapore schools: pedagogical and policy implications, Education Tech Research Dev., Vol. 55, pp.83–116, (2006). [14] Mukama, E., and Andersson, S. B., Coping with change in ICT‐based learning environments: Newly qualified Rwandan teachers' reflections. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 156‐166, (2008). [15] Shahbaz, S., Zamani, B & Nasr asfahani, A., Investigating of teachers accessing to ICT and their using of them in Esfahan high schools, Journal of Science and information technology, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 23-45, (2007). [in Persian]. [16] Khadem Masjedi, H., ICT roles in improving teaching and learning process in high schools, unprinted theses in educational technology, (2010).[In Persian]. [17] Liu. Q., Zhang. S., and Wang. Q., Surveying Chinese In-Service K12 Teachers’ Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 53,No. 1,pp. 55-74, (2015). [18] Jamieson-Proctor, R., Finger, G., and Albion, P., (2010), Auditing the TPACK capabilities of final year teacher education students: are they ready for the 21st century?. In Proceedings of the 2010 Australian Computers in Education Conference, pp. 1-12, Australian Council for Computers in Education, (ACEC 2010). [19] Erdogan, A., and Sahin, I., Relationship between math teacher candidates’ technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK) and achievement levels. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 2707-2711, (2010).
[20] Tagizadeh, M. & Fathi azar, E., & Habibi, H., Study of teachers and students experiences in ICT using, Journal of technology education, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 45-55, (2015).
[21] Baylor, A. L., and Ritchie, D., What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms, Computers & Education Vol. 39, pp. 395–414, (2002).
[22] Mahmoudi, J., Nalchgar, S., Ebrahimi, B. & Sadegimogaddam. M. Study of syber school development challenges, Journal of educational innovation, Vol. 27, No. 3, pp. 61-78, (2008).
[23] Puteh, M. and Vicziany, A. M., How smart are Malaysia’s smart schools? Paper presented at the 4th Global Congress on Engineering Education, Bangkok, Thailand, 5–9 Jul, )2004).
[24] Archambault, L., and Crippen, K., Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, Vol. 9, No. 1, pp. 71-88, (2009).
[25] Seraji, F., Study of developing cyber schools hinders and potentials in hamedan. Research in hamedan education research institute, (2015). [In Persian].
[26] Jamshidzadeh, A., Identifying appropriate characterizes of primary school teachers for ICT using and comparing of Hamden primary teachers with this. Unprinted thesis in curriculum planning at Bu Ali Sina University, (2013).
[27] Liu. Q., Zhang. S, and Wang. Q., Surveying Chinese In-Service K12 Teachers’ Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge, Journal of Educational Computing Research, Vol. 53, No. 1, pp. 55–74, (2015).
[28] Sahin. I., Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK), TOJET, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 97-105, (2011). | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 1,347 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,786 |
||