ارزیابی پارامترهای موثر بر دقت مثلث‌بندی هوایی در نقشه برداری از مناطق راهگذر

[1] Tziavou, O., S. Pytharouli, and J. Souter, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) based mapping in engineering geological surveys: Considerations for optimum results. Engineering Geology, 2018. 232: p. 12-21.

[2] Ferrer-González E, Agüera-Vega F, Carvajal-Ramírez F, Martínez-Carricondo P. UAV photogrammetry accuracy assessment for corridor mapping based on the number and distribution of ground control points. Remote sensing. 2020;12(15):2447. DOI: 10.3390/rs12152447

[3] Howard J, Murashov V, Branche CM. Unmanned aerial vehicles in construction and worker safety. American journal of industrial medicine. 2018;61(1):3-10. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22782

[4] Bethel JS, Van Gelder BH, Cetin AF, Sampath A. Corridor mapping using aerial technique. 2006.

DOI: 10.5703/1288284313396

[5] Cledat E, Jospin LV, Cucci DA, Skaloud J. Mapping quality prediction for RTK/PPK-equipped micro-drones operating in complex natural environment. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing. 2020;167:24-38.

DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.05.015

[6] UAV AS Corridor Mapping Made Easy with DJI Drones. 2023.

[7] Norouzi A. 2020 [Available from: https://phoenix-air.ir/the-role-of-uavs-in-inspecting-power-transmission-lines/

[8] Abbaspour m, Azar m, Khoshlahjeh, Varshosaz m. Impact of the number and position of ground control points in the accuracy obtained for the UAV photogrammetry based prepared. 2018. DOI:10.13140/RG.2.2.18739.68644

[9] Martínez-Carricondo P, Agüera-Vega F, Carvajal-Ramírez F, Mesas-Carrascosa F-J, García-Ferrer A, Pérez-Porras F-J. Assessment of UAV-photogrammetric mapping accuracy based on variation of ground control points. International journal of applied earth observation and geoinformation. 2018;72:1-10.

DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2018.05.015

[10] Skarlatos D, Procopiou E, Stavrou G, Gregoriou M. Accuracy assessment of minimum control points for UAV photography and georeferencing: SPIE; 2013. DOI:10.1117/12.2028988

[11] Harwin S, Lucieer A, Osborn J. The impact of the calibration method on the accuracy of point clouds derived using unmanned aerial vehicle multi-view stereopsis. Remote Sensing. 2015;7(9):11933-53. DOI: 10.3390/rs70911933

[12] Jaud M, Passot S, Allemand P, Le Dantec N, Grandjean P, Delacourt C. Suggestions to limit geometric distortions in the reconstruction of linear coastal landforms by SfM photogrammetry with PhotoScan® and MicMac® for UAV surveys with restricted GCPs pattern. Drones. 2018;3(1):2. DOI:10.3390/drones3010002

[13] Sammartano G, Chiabrando F, Spanò A. Oblique images and direct photogrammetry with a fixed wing platform: first test and results in Hierapolis of Phrygia (TK). The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2020;43:75-82.

DOI:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B2-2020-75-2020

[14] Santos Santana L, Araújo E Silva Ferraz G, Bedin Marin D, Dienevam Souza Barbosa B, Mendes Dos Santos L, Ferreira Ponciano Ferraz P, et al. Influence of flight altitude and control points in the georeferencing of images obtained by unmanned aerial vehicle. European Journal of Remote Sensing. 2021;54(1):59-71. DOI: 10.1080/22797254.2020.1845104

[15] Heidarimozaffar M, Zerafatyjamal R, Torabzadeh Khorasani H. Accuracy and Precision of Producing Topographic Maps in Linear Projects by UAV Photogrammetric Method. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR). 2023;31(124):21-38. DOI: 10.22131/sepehr.2023.555436.2879

[16] Erfanzadeh A, Saadatseresht M. Behavior analysis and the effect of UAV photogrammetric network design parameters on the quality of 3D reconstruction by Monte Carlo imulation Method. Scientific-Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR). 2021;30(119):27-45.

DOI: 10.22131/sepehr.2021.247874

[17] Shahbazi M, Sohn G, Théau J, Menard P. Development and evaluation of a UAV-photogrammetry system for precise 3D environmental modeling. Sensors. 2015; 15(11): 27493-524. DOI: 10.3390/s151127493

[18] Abbaspour  m, Varshosaz m. Studying the effect of dispersion of image target points in the resulted accuracy and precision for interior and exterior orientation parameters in camera calibration process. n National Conference on New Geomatics Technologies and Applications. 2018.

[19] UASMaster TI. [Available from: https://geospatial.trimble.com/en

[20] Metashape. Agisoft Metashape [Available from: https://www.agisoft.com

[21] PhotoModeler. [Available from: https://www.photomodeler.com

[22] CONTEXTCAPTURE. [Available from: https://www.bentley.com/brand/contextcapture/

[23] 3DSurvey. [Available from: https://3dsurvey.si/software/industries/

[24] Sužiedelytė Visockienė J, Bručas D, Ragauskas U. Comparison of UAV images processing softwares. Journal of Measurements in Engineering. 2014;2(2):111-21.

[25] Pix4DMapper. [Available from: https://www.pix4D.com.

[26] PHOTOMOD. [Available from: https://en.racurs.ru

[27] Alidoost F, Arefi H. Comparison of UAS-based photogrammetry software for 3D point cloud generation: a survey over a historical site. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 2017;4:55-61.

DOI:10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W4-55-2017

[28] SURE. [Available from: https://www.nframes.com/about-us/

[29] Barbasiewicz A, Widerski T, Daliga K, editors. The analysis of the accuracy of spatial models using photogrammetric software: Agisoft Photoscan and Pix4D. E3S Web of Conferences; 2018: EDP Sciences.

DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/20182600012

[30] Ajeet Kumar Gond, A.O., Shishir Gaur, Nilendu Das Accuracy Assessment and Optimization of the Photogrammetric Process Variables for 3D Mapping Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (Drones). 2025.

[31] Sadeghian  s, Milan  A, Ahmadi  H, Karimi  R. Aerial triangulation based on digital images, GPS/IMU and optimized self-calibration parameters by genetic algorithm. Scientific - Research Quarterly of Geographical Data (SEPEHR). 2020;29.

DOI: 10.22131/sepehr.2020.47881

[32] Huang H, Ye Z, Zhang C, Yue Y, Cui C, Hammad A. Adaptive Cloud-to-Cloud (AC2C) Comparison Method for Photogrammetric Point Cloud Error Estimation Considering Theoretical Error Space. Remote Sensing. 2022;14(17):4289.

DOI: 10.3390/rs14174289

[33] Mitishita, E., et al. Study of stability analysis of the interior orientation parameters from the small-format digital camera using on-the-job calibration. in Canadian Geomatics Conference. 2010.

[34] Huang, H., et al., Adaptive Cloud-to-Cloud (AC2C) Comparison Method for Photogrammetric Point Cloud Error Estimation Considering Theoretical Error Space. Remote Sensing, 2022. 14(17): p. 4289.