پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 11 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 227 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,310 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,586,850 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,628,122 |
تأثیر معماری بایوفیلیک در نمای ساختمان مسکونی، بر کاهش مصرف انرژی (نمونه موردی: مجتمع مسکونی آرین مشهد) | ||
| معماری و شهرسازی پایدار | ||
| مقاله 9، دوره 12، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 24، دی 1403، صفحه 153-168 اصل مقاله (1.02 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/jsaud.2025.11473.2275 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سعید علی تاجر* 1؛ مهدی غیاثی2؛ سیده فائزه اعتماد شیخ الاسلامی3 | ||
| 1دانشیار، گروه معماری دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد معماری، دانشکده هنر و معماری، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران. | ||
| 3استادیار، گروه مهندسی معماری، دانشکده مهندسی عمران و معماری، دانشگاه ملایر، ملایر، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 10 آذر 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 02 بهمن 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 03 اردیبهشت 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقدمه: ساختمان‌های مسکونی نقش مهمی در مصرف انرژی و انتشار گازهای گلخانه‌ای دارند. طراحی ناکارآمد و فقدان تهویه طبیعی، از دلایل مصرف بالای انرژی در این ساختمان‌هاست. معماری بایوفیلیک به‌عنوان یک راهکار نوین، با الهام از طبیعت و استفاده از عناصر طبیعی مانند؛ گیاهان، نور طبیعی و مصالح زیست‌سازگار، به بهینه‌سازی مصرف انرژی کمک می‌کند. در این پژوهش، تأثیر معماری بایوفیلیک بر کاهش مصرف انرژی در نمای ساختمان‌های مسکونی در اقلیم گرم‌وخشک مشهد بررسی شده است. روش تحقیق: این مطالعه به روش توصیفی-تحلیلی انجام شد. نمونه موردی، مجتمع مسکونی آرین 10 مشهد انتخاب شد. برای ارزیابی تأثیر عناصر بایوفیلیک، از نرم‌افزار دیزاین بیلدر جهت شبیه‌سازی مصرف انرژی و آسایش حرارتی استفاده شد. سه سناریو شامل: 1) پوشش گیاهی در نما، 2) پوشش گیاهی همراه با عایق Bio PCM و 3) پوشش گیاهی همراه با بتن همکریت و سبوس برنج بررسی و داده‌های مصرف انرژی الکتریکی و گاز قبل و بعد از اعمال این تغییرات مقایسه شد. نتایج و بحث: نتایج نشان داد که استفاده از عناصر بایوفیلیک باعث کاهش 4.6% تا 6.8% در مصرف انرژی الکتریکی شد. بیشترین کاهش در حالتی مشاهده شد که از بتن همکریت و سبوس برنج در کنار پوشش گیاهی استفاده شد. همچنین، آسایش حرارتی ساکنان بهبود یافت و هزینه‌های سالانه انرژی کاهش پیدا کرد. نتیجه‌گیری: معماری بایوفیلیک در نمای ساختمان‌های مسکونی، بهینه‌سازی مصرف انرژی و افزایش آسایش حرارتی را امکان‌پذیر می‌کند. پیشنهاد می‌شود این رویکرد در طراحی پایدار شهری و معماری مسکونی گسترش یابد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| معماری بایوفیلیک؛ کاهش مصرف انرژی؛ نمای سبز ساختمان؛ آسایش حرارتی؛ مصالح پایدار | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Impact of Biophilic Architecture on the Facade of Residential Buildings in Energy Consumption Reduction (Case Study: Arian Residential Complex, Mashhad) | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Saeid Alitajer1؛ Mahdi Ghiasy2؛ Seyedeh Faezeh Etemad Sheykhaleslami3 | ||
| 1Janbazan Alley, Bu-Ali Sina University No 10 | ||
| 2Student at Bu Ali Sina University, Hamadan | ||
| 3Department of Architectural Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Objective: Residential buildings play a significant role in energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Inefficient designs and lack of natural ventilation contribute to excessive energy use. Biophilic architecture, as an innovative approach, integrates nature-inspired elements such as greenery, natural light, and eco-friendly materials to optimize energy consumption. This study examines the impact of biophilic architecture on reducing energy consumption in residential building facades in the hot and dry climate of Mashhad. Methodology: This research follows a descriptive-analytical approach. The case study is Arian 10 residential complex in Mashhad. The Design-Builder software was used to simulate energy consumption and thermal comfort. Three scenarios were analyzed: (1) green facade, (2) green facade with Bio-PCM insulation, and (3) green facade with hempcrete and rice husk insulation. The energy consumption of electricity and gas was compared before and after implementing these biophilic elements. Results and Discussion: The findings indicate that incorporating biophilic elements reduced electricity consumption by 4.6% to 6.8%. The most significant reduction was observed when hempcrete and rice husk were combined with greenery. Additionally, thermal comfort improved, and annual energy costs decreased. Conclusion: Biophilic architecture in residential facades can optimize energy consumption and enhance thermal comfort. It is recommended that this approach be integrated into sustainable urban planning and residential architecture. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Biophilic Architecture, Energy Consumption Reduction, Green Building Façade, Thermal Comfort, Sustainable Materials | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
#Africa, J., Heerwagen, J., Loftness, V., & Ryan Balagtas, C. (2019). Biophilic design and climate change: Performance parameters for health. Frontiers in Built Environment, 5, 28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00028 Al-Dmour, Y., Garaj, V., & Clements-Croome, D. (2021). The flourishing of Biophilic workplaces: ‘Second Home’ offices as a case study. Intelligent Buildings International, 13(4), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2020.1807895 Asojo, A., & Hazazi, F. (2025). Biophilic design strategies and indoor environmental quality: A case study. Sustainability, 17(5), 1816. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17051816 Barbu, M., Darie, G., & Siroux, M. (2019). Analysis of a residential photovoltaic-thermal (PVT) system in two similar climate conditions. Energies, 12(19), 3595. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12193595 Boffi, M., Pola, L., Fumagalli, N., Fermani, E., Senes, G., & Inghilleri, P. (2021). Nature experiences of older people for active ageing: An interdisciplinary approach to the co-design of community gardens. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 702525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.702525 Cacique, M., & Ou, S. (2022). Biophilic design as a strategy for accomplishing the idea of healthy, sustainable, and resilient environments. Sustainability, 14(9), 5605. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095605 Esmaeili, N., Golabchi, M., & Ghobadian, V. (2020). Evaluation of customer attraction with a focus on biophilic design features: Case study of Saray-e-Moshir, Shiraz. Armanshahr Architecture and Urban Development, 13(30), 1–17. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2019.189276.1925 Gong, Y., Zoltán, E. S., & János, G. (2023). Healthy dwelling: The perspective of biophilic design in the design of the living space. Buildings, 13(8), 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13082020 Manfren, M., Nastasi, B., & Tronchin, L. (2020). Linking design and operation phase energy performance analysis through regression-based approaches. Frontiers in Energy Research, 8, 557649. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.557649 Mohammadi, S., & Vasigh, B. (2019). Evaluation of the biophilic approach in reducing energy consumption in residential houses in Kerman. Hot and Dry Climate Architecture Journal, 7(10), 175–197. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.29252/ahdc.2020.1780 Moghaddasi, N. S., Mohammadi, M. K., Saremi, H. R., & Haghighatbin, M. (2023). The impact of biophilic architecture on the physical-environmental resilience of residential complexes: Case study of the Tehran International Tower. Iranian Islamic City Studies Journal, 14(53), 59–74. [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/2096152/ Mousavi, S. M., Mirzaei, R., Heidari, A., & Asadi, S. N. (2023). Investigating the biophilic approach for environmentally friendly and human health-oriented design based on a data-driven method. Geography and Environmental Sustainability Quarterly, 13(46), 41–54. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22126/ges.2022.8127.2563 Nitu, M. A., Gocer, O., Wijesooriya, N., Vijapur, D., & Candido, C. (2022). A biophilic design approach for improved energy performance in retrofitting residential projects. Sustainability, 14(7), 3776. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073776 Param, M. R. G., Bavar, S. N., & Mahmoudi, H. (2020). Evaluating the impact of biophilic architecture principles on the design quality of housing in northern Iran (Case study: Gorgan). New Perspectives in Human Geography Quarterly, 12(2), 405–424. [In Persian]. https://www.sid.ir/paper/519781/fa Parsaee, M., Demers, C. M., Hébert, M., Lalonde, J.-F., & Potvin, A. (2019). A photobiological approach to biophilic design in extreme climates. Building and Environment, 154, 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.03.027 Pertile, V., Stella, A., De Stefani, L., & Scotta, R. (2021). Seismic and energy integrated retrofitting of existing buildings with an innovative ICF-based system: Design principles and case studies. Sustainability, 13(16), 9363. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169363 Peters, T., & D’Penna, K. (2020). Biophilic design for restorative university learning environments: A critical review of literature and design recommendations. Sustainability, 12(17), 7064. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177064 Rostam, F. Y., Zarrabadi, Z. S. S., & Habib, F. (2023). Reading the requirements of biophilic interstitial space design in residential complexes in Tehran: Case study of phase one of Ekbatan Town. Urban Ecology Research Journal, 14(33), 103–120. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.30473/grup.2023.68618.2800 Sadick, A.-M., Kamardeen, I., & Vu, X. P. (2023). Challenges for implementing biophilic strategies in Australian building design. Journal of Building Engineering, 74, 106849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2024.108464 Salehabadi, A. M., & Bahoush, M. (2017). Climate analysis of Yazd with an approach to determine climate-compatible architectural patterns. 3rd Annual International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Planning. [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/636296 Samati, P., & Behtash, M. R. F. (2021). Biophilic urban design to improve environmental quality with a perceptual approach: Comparative study of Oslo and Ramsar. Urban Design Discourse Journal, 2(2), 21–34. [In Persian]. https://udd.modares.ac.ir/article-40-54580-fa.html Sayyadi Mahalleh, K. (2023). Effects and applications of biophilic architecture on creating a sense of place attachment in elderly home design. 7th International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Planning. [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/1707901 Shirazizadeh, A. M., & Cheshmeh, M. G. (2020). Retrieving biophilic architectural concepts in traditional Iranian house architecture. International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture, Development, and Regeneration of Urban Infrastructure in Iran. [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/1113827/ Solla, M., Elmesh, A., Memon, Z. A., Ismail, L. H., Kazee, M. F. A., Latif, Q. B. a. I., Yusoff, N. I. M., Alosta, M., & Milad, A. (2022). Analysis of BIM-based digitising of Green Building Index (GBI): Assessment method. Buildings, 12(4), 429. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12040429 Taghipour, A. A., Dehrshid, P. A., Mashaikhi, A., & Ayami, M. (2024). Analyzing dimensions of the biophilic citizen and evaluating them in the urban society: A prelude to nature-based urban planning (Case study: Khaf city). Human Geography Research Quarterly, 56(128), 149–175. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22059/jhgr.2023.349515.1008547 Tandrosaleh, N., Hojjati, V., & Movahed, K. (2023). Identifying influential components of biophilic architecture on reducing stress in housewives in residential complexes: Case study of Shiraz. Housing and Rural Environment Quarterly, 42(184), 75–88. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22034/42.184.75 Tardast, Z., Rajabi, A., & Meshkini, A. (2020). A feasibility model of indigenous biophilic city indicators: Case study of districts 9 and 10 in Tehran metropolis. Sustainable City Quarterly, 3(1), 123–146. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22034/jsc.2020.188787.1032 Tardast, Z., Rajabi, A., & Meshkini, A. (2021). Presenting an indigenized biophilic city model in districts 9 and 10 of Tehran metropolis. Urban Research and Planning Quarterly, 12(45), 85–98. [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.30495/jupm.2021.3946 Tekin, B. H., Corcoran, R., & Gutiérrez, R. U. (2023). A systematic review and conceptual framework of biophilic design parameters in clinical environments. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 16(1), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1177/19375867221118675 Zarei, E., & Kheiri, H. (2022). Explanation of patterns, principles, and theoretical foundations of biophilic design from the perspective of thinkers: A theoretical review. 8th Annual International Congress on Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Development. [In Persian]. https://civilica.com/doc/1655912 Zhong, W., Schröder, T., & Bekkering, J. (2022). Biophilic design in architecture and its contributions to health, well-being, and sustainability: A critical review. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 11(1), 114–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.07.006.# | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 328 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 71 |
||