پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 11 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 228 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,321 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 3,638,848 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 2,675,664 |
مفهومسازی سرزندگی در مقیاس فضای شهری؛ تدوین یک مدل مفهومی پویا | ||
| معماری و شهرسازی پایدار | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 12، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 23، تیر 1403، صفحه 85-102 اصل مقاله (1.46 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/jsaud.2024.10898.2230 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| عماد شمس اله1؛ حمید ماجدی* 2؛ زهرا سادات سعیده زرآبادی3 | ||
| 1پژوهشگر دکتری شهرسازی، گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2استاد، گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران | ||
| 3دانشیار، گروه شهرسازی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 22 اردیبهشت 1403، تاریخ بازنگری: 31 مرداد 1403، تاریخ پذیرش: 06 شهریور 1403 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقدمه: فقدان «سرزندگی» نوعی فقر است که توسعه پایدار را تهدید می کند. بر این اساس، امروزه خلق و ارتقای «سرزندگی»، به عنوان یکی از مهمترین اهداف برنامه های توسعه ی شهری دنبال می شود. این در حالی است که «سرزندگی شهری» در عرصه نظری به گونه ای مناسب مفهوم سازی نشده و یک مدل نظری ساختارمند و یکپارچه در ارتباط با آن به ویژه در مقیاس فضاهای شهری (به عنوان مهمترین کانون های تبلور سرزندگی شهری) تدوین نشده است. در عرصه داخلی نیز، با وجود انجام پژوهش های متعدد، به دلایلی از جمله کمینگری بیشتر این پژوهش ها و عدم درک یا پذیرش سرزندگی به مثابه «یک کل» شکاف نظری مورد اشاره پابرجاست. بر این اساس، ضرورت تبیین سرزندگی بر مبنای یک لنز نظری «کلنگر» و مفهوم سازی مناسب آن بیش از پیش احساس می شود. روش تحقیق: پژوهش پیش رو با هدف مفهوم سازی سرزندگی در مقیاس فضای شهری، طی مطالعه ای نظری-بنیادی و بر مبنای روش تحلیل محتوای متون، به گونه ای ساختارمند به بررسی ادبیات نظری جهانی می پردازد و بر این مبنا، «ابعاد»، «معیارها» و «شاخص ها»ی سرزندگی شهری را در قالب یک مدل مفهومی تبیین می کند. نتایج و بحث: سرزندگی در مقیاس فضای شهری را در قالب یک «مدل پویای سه سطحی»، می توان مفهوم سازی کرد. سطح اول دربردارنده 3 بُعدِ «کالبدی-محیطی»، «عملکردی-مدیریتی» و «ادراکی-معنایی»، سطح دوم شامل 15 معیار و سطح سوم مشتمل بر 55 شاخص(با قابلیت کمی سازی به منظور سنجش سرزندگی) به همراه «شاخص های زمینه ای» است. همچنین پویایی مدل پیشنهادی برمبنای توجه به عنصر «زمان» تعریف می شود. نتیجه گیری: بر مبنای یافته ها، هفت عامل کلیدی در تبیین سرزندگی شهری نقش دارند: 1) حرکت و پویایی، 2) رویدادها، 3) زمینه ای برای بروز، 4) حضورپذیری، 5) تنوع شهری، 6) انرژی شهر و 7) زندگی فعال خیابانی. آفرینش سرزندگی شهری نیز در گرو توجه به دیالکتیک و رابطه میان سه عنصر «انسان»، «فضا» و «فعالیت» است. سرزندگی شهری، بر اساس مدل مفهومی پیشنهادی، دربردارنده «مجموعه ای از عوامل متعدد و به هم مرتبط» است. به بیان دیگر، سرزندگی چتر جامعیتش را بر تمامی کیفیت های مرتبط با یک فضای شهری اعم از کالبدی، عملکردی و معنایی می گستراند. بر این اساس ضروری است از آن تحت عنوان «فرامفهوم» یا «مفهوم فراگیر» یاد شود. این «دیدگاه کل نگر» نسبت به سرزندگی شهری می تواند ابهامات و آشفتگی های نظری پیرامون آن را تحدید کرده و به انسجام بخشی مبانی نظری آن کمک نماید. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| سرزندگی؛ سرزندگی شهری؛ مفهومسازی؛ مدل مفهومی پویا؛ پژوهش کیفی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Conceptualization of vitality on the scale of urban space; Development of a dynamic conceptual model | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Emad Shamsollah1؛ Hamid Majedi2؛ zahra sadat saeideh zarabadi3 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student, Department of Urban Development, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Professor, Department of Urban Development, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3Associate Professor, Department of Urban Development, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Introduction Today, although urban societies have become more introverted and private with the expansion of communication technologies, and subsequently, urban spaces, as the most important centers of vitality and collective life, have been threatened, but still ,there is a need to provide facilities in order to more vitality the mentioned spaces as much as possible. "Vitality" is a concept with a "qualitative", "abstract" and "mental" nature, which can be considered as including all the spatial qualities in an urban space or place. Despite the importance and position of this concept in improving the quality of urban life, it has not been conceptualized accurately so far. In the domestic field, most of the previous researches have studied urban vitality based on quantitative approaches and have not contributed to the conceptualization of urban vitality from this point of view. with the aim of limiting the mentioned knowledge gap, this research tries to investigate urban vitality through a theoretical-fundamental and qualitative study and take an effective step towards conceptualizing it as a "whole". Based on this, in the first level of research, based on the world theoretical literature, the two concepts of "vitality" and "urban vitality" are explained. Then, in the second level, with the help of text content analysis, the dimensions, criteria and indicators of urban vitality are explained and used in compiling the "dynamic model of vitality at the scale of urban spaces". Methodology After selecting 25 relevant sources, data related to the vitality of urban spaces were collected and classified through a three-step process. In the first step, phrases and words reflecting indicators of urban vitality were selected and labeled with a theme (open coding). In the second step, through constant comparison, similar and related themes were placed in a conceptual class and formed 15 categories (axial coding). In the third step, themes and categories were classified and related in the form of three dimensions (selective coding). Finally, the dynamic conceptual model of vitality at the scale of urban space was developed in the form of a schematic diagram. Results and discussion The proposed conceptual model is presented in the form of a schematic diagram, including 3 dimensions, 15 criteria and 55 indicators, which conceptualize urban vitality on the scale of urban space and it can be used to measure or evaluate the vitality of urban spaces. This model has the ability to be developed (especially at the level of indicators) in future researches. In addition to the proposed indices, in relation to each index, an index called "contextual index" has been predicted, which may be able to take into account the specific conditions (social, cultural, political, etc.) of the city. This model, considering the two factors of "time" and "contextual indicators" is considered a dynamic and acceptable model that can be used in various fields and cultures. Conclusion Among the most important findings of the upcoming research, the following can be mentioned: Unlike most of the previous researches (both domestic and foreign) that have presented urban vitality as one-dimensional and generally derived from diversity (activity and social), the current research considers urban vitality as "One whole" includes a set of multiple and interrelated factors to improve the quality of the environment and the quality of life. Seven interrelated key factors play a role in explaining urban vitality: 1) movement and dynamism, 2) events, 3) context for emergence, 4) accessibility, 5) urban diversity, 6) city energy, 7 ) active street life. The process of creating urban vitality can be conceptualized in the form of a three-component model, which is based on attention to the dialectic and the relationship between the three elements of "human", "space" and "activity". These elements are respectively related to 3 dimensions "cognitive-semantic", "physical-environmental" and "functional-management". | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Vitality, urban vitality, conceptualization, dynamic conceptual model, qualitative research | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Anderson, J., Ruggeri, K., Steemers, K., & Huppert, F. (2017). Lively social space, well-being activity, and urban design:# findings from a low-cost community-led public space intervention. Environment and behavior, 49(6), 685-716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916516659108 Batty M (2013). The New Science of Cities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. DOI:10.1080/13658816.2014.937717 Biswas-Diener, R., & Dean, B. (2007). Positive psychology coaching: Putting the science of happiness to work for your clients. John Wiley & Sons. DOI:10.1080/17439760902992498 Blessing, R. (2017). Jane eternal: The lasting influence of Jane Jacobs’s death and life of great American cities on urban planning. Journal of Planning History, 16(1), 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513216680464 Bostic, T. J. (2002). Constructive thinking, mental health, and physical health: An explanatory model of correlated constructs in health psychology. Saint Louis University. https://www.proquest.com/openview/c47ca0f92022e93dc74f313ed2288122/1?pqorigsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y Bradshaw, M. (2005). Variety and vitality. In D. Chapman(Ed.), Creating neighbourhoods and places in the built environment, (113-134), Taylor & Francis e-Library. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203362341 Chion, M. (2009). Producing urban vitality: The case of dance in San Francisco. Urban Geography, 30(4), 416-439. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.30.4.416 Cowan, R. (2005). The dictionary of urbanism illustrated by Lucinda Rogers, streetwise Press. https://dokumen.pub/qdownload/the-dictionary-of-urbanism-0954433009-9780954433000.html de Cillo Malufe Spignardi, M. (2020). Lively Urban Spaces. In: Ghosh, M. (eds) Perception, Design and Ecology of the Built Environment. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. DOI:10.1007/978-3-030-25879-5_24 Department of the Environment. (1996) Town Centres and Retail Development. Revised Planning Policy Guidance Note 6. London:HMSO. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.67.2.k806p7841311u740 Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. (2002). Very happy people. Psychological science, 13(1), 81-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00415 Gehl, J. (2010). Cities for people. Island press. https://archive.org/details/cities-for-people-jan-gehl Government of South Australia. (2013). Adelaide after dark. https://www.reddit.com/r/Adelaide/comments/14usj3r/adelaide_after_dark/ Holland, C., Clark, A., Katz, J., & Peace, S. (2007). Social interactions in urban public places. Joseph Rowntree Foundation,York. http://www.jrf.org.uk/bookshop/eBooks/2017-interactions-public-places.pdf Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative health research, 15(9), 1277-1288. DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687 ITF (2012), Pedestrian Safety, Urban Space and Health, OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pedestrian-safety-urban-space-and-health_9789282103654-en.html Jacobs, J., )1961(. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. Vintage, New York. https://www.academia.edu/31943664/_Jane_Jacobs_The_Death_and_Life_of_Great_American Kang, C., Fan, D., & Jiao, H. (2021). Validating activity, time, and space diversity as essential components of urban vitality. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(5), 1180-1197. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320919771 Karras, J. (2015). The 10 Traits of VIBRANT Cities, Urban scale. http://urbanscale.com/ebook/ Landry, C. (2008). The creative city: A toolkit for urban innovators. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849772945 Lavrusheva, O. (2020). The concept of vitality. Review of the vitality-related research domain. New Ideas in Psychology, 56, 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2019.100752 Li, Q., Cui, C., Liu, F., Wu, Q., Run, Y., & Han, Z. (2021). Multidimensional urban vitality on streets: Spatial patterns and influence factor identification using multisource urban data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11010002 Liu, S., Zhang, L., & Long, Y. (2019). Urban vitality area identification and pattern analysis from the perspective of time and space fusion. Sustainability, 11(15), 4032. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154032 Liu, S., Zhang, L., Long, Y., Long, Y., & Xu, M. (2020). A new urban vitality analysis and evaluation framework based on human activity modeling using multi-source big data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(11), 617. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9110617 Lopes, M. N., & Camanho, A. S. (2013). Public green space use and consequences on urban vitality: An assessment of European cities. Social indicators research, 113(3), 751-767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0106-9 Lynch, K. (1981). Good city form. MIT press. DOI: 10.1604/9780262120852 Maas, P. R. (1984). Towards a theory of urban vitality (Master of Art dissertation, University of British Columbia). https://open.library.ubc.ca/soa/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0096212 Mehta, V. (2007). Lively streets: Determining environmental characteristics to support social behavior. Journal of planning education and research, 27(2), 165-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X07307947 Montgomery, J. (1995). Editorial urban vitality and the culture of cities. Planning Practice & Research, 10(2), 101-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459550036649 Montgomery, J. (1998). Making a city: Urbanity, vitality and urban design. Journal of urban design, 3(1), 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418 Paköz, M. Z., Yaratgan, D., & Şahin, A. (2022). Re-mapping urban vitality through Jane Jacobs’ criteria: The case of Kayseri, Turkey. Land Use Policy, 114, 105985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.105985 Pan, H., Yang, C., Quan, L., & Liao, L. (2021). A new insight into understanding urban vitality: A case study in the Chengdu-Chongqing area twin-city economic circle, China. Sustainability, 13(18), 10068. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810068 Ravenscroft, N. (2000). The vitality and viability of town centres. Urban studies, 37(13), 2533-2549. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980020080681 Rosengren, K. E. (1981). Advances in content analysis (Vol. 9). SAGE Publications. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343262408_Advances_In_Quantitative_Content_Analysis_ed_Karl-Erik_Rosengren_-_Review_by_Evert_Vedung Ryan, R. & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well-being. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 529–565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1997.tb00326.x Shi, J., Miao, W., Si, H., & Liu, T. (2021). Urban Vitality Evaluation and Spatial Correlation Research: A Case Study from Shanghai, China. Land, 10(11), 1195. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10111195 Stern, D. N. (2010). Forms of vitality: Exploring dynamic experience in psychology, the arts, psychotherapy, and development. Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1080/17432979.2012.674062 Sung, H., & Lee, S. (2015). Residential built environment and walking activity: Empirical evidence of Jane Jacobs’ urban vitality. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 41, 318-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.009 Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. Project for Public Spaces. https://streetlifestudies.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/1980_whyte_small_spaces_book.pdf Yue, W., Chen, Y., Zhang, Q., & Liu, Y. (2019). Spatial explicit assessment of urban vitality using multi-source data: A case #of Shanghai, China. Sustainability, 11(3), 638. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030638 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 559 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 840 |
||