برگزاری آزمونک در کلاس های پرازدحام با استفاده از فناوری اطلاعات

[7]Nicol D.J. and Boyle J.T., Peer instruction versus class-wide discussion: a comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom, Studies in Higher Education, Vol.28, No.4, 1993, pp.457-473. [8] Levin T. and Wadmany R., Teachers’ views on factors affecting effective integration of information technology in the classroom: Developmental scenery, Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, Vol.16, No.2, 2008, pp.233-263. [9] Saaty T.L., the Analytical Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, and Resources Allocation, McGraw-Hill, 1980. [10] Mosaramezani S., The Effect of Lecturing and Multimedia Education Methods on Achievement Motivation and Self-Regulation Arabic Course (2) Students of Distance Education Centers in Tehran, Journal of Technology of Education, Vol.6, No.1, 2011, pp.45-57. [1]Hake R.R., Interactive engagement versus traditional methods: a six-thousand student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, American Journal of Physics, Vol.66, 1998, pp.64-74. [2]Palinscar A.S., Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol.49, 1998, pp.345-75. [3]Springer L., Stanne M. E. and Donovon S., Effects of small group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering and technology: a meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, Vol.69, No.1, 1999, pp.50-80. [4]Edwards H., Smith B.A. and Webb G., Lecturing: Case Studies, Experience and Practice, London: Kogan Page, 2001. [5]Crouch C.H. and Mazur E., Peer instruction: ten years of experience and result, American Journal of Physics, Vol.69, 2001, pp.970-977. [6]Dufresne R. J., Gerace W. J., Leonard W. J., Mestre J.P. and Wenk L., Classtalk: a classroom communication system for active learning, Journal of Computing in Higher Education,Vol.7,1996, pp.3-47.