پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 15 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 246 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,509 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,499,512 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,316,522 |
مرور سیستماتیک پارامترهای طراحی معماری مؤثر بر سلامت شبانه‌روزی و آسایش غیر بصری نور روز | ||
| معماری و شهرسازی پایدار | ||
| مقاله 1، دوره 13، شماره 2، اسفند 1404، صفحه 1-22 اصل مقاله (2.21 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/jsaud.2026.11761.2320 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| زهرا رستمی نجف آبادی1؛ زهرا زمانی* 2 | ||
| 1دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد معماری و انرژی، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| 2استادیار گروه فناوری معماری، دانشکده معماری، دانشکدگان هنرهای زیبا ، دانشگاه تهران | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 16 خرداد 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 21 مهر 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 14 دی 1404 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقدمه: اثرات غیربصری نور بر سلامت شبانه‌روزی، عملکرد شناختی و کیفیت زندگی انسان، در سال‌های اخیر به یکی از موضوعات مهم در طراحی معماری و روشنایی تبدیل شده است. از آنجا که ویژگی‌های معماری ساختمان بر کمیت و کیفیت نور دریافتی کاربران تأثیر می‌گذارد، شناسایی عوامل طراحی مؤثر بر آسایش غیربصری نور روز از اهمیت ویژه‌ای برخوردار است. روش تحقیق: این پژوهش با روش مرور سیستماتیک و بر اساس دستورالعمل PRISMA 2020 انجام شد. مطالعات مرتبط در پایگاه‌های Google Scholar، ScienceDirect و Elsevier در بازه زمانی 2014 تا 2025 جستجو شدند. پس از غربالگری، حذف موارد تکراری و اعمال معیارهای ورود و خروج، 30 مقاله واجد شرایط انتخاب و مورد تحلیل قرار گرفتند. در این مطالعه، پارامترهای طراحی معماری، متغیرهای وابسته، شاخص‌های ارزیابی و رویکردهای پژوهشی مورد بررسی و دسته‌بندی قرار گرفتند. نتایج و بحث: نتایج نشان داد که در میان پارامترهای طراحی معماری، پنجره‌ها (31 درصد)، سیستم‌های سایه‌انداز (14 درصد) و صفحات داخلی (13 درصد) بیشترین سهم را در مطالعات مرتبط با سلامت شبانه‌روزی داشته‌اند. همچنین شاخص‌های Circadian Stimulus (CS)، Equivalent Melanopic Lux (EML) و Melanopic Equivalent Daylight Illuminance (m-EDI) پرکاربردترین معیارهای ارزیابی آسایش غیربصری بوده‌اند. بررسی رویکرد مطالعات منتخب نشان داد که 67 درصد پژوهش‌ها صرفاً بر اثرات غیربصری نور متمرکز بوده‌اند، در حالی که تنها 33 درصد از مطالعات به ارزیابی هم‌زمان آسایش بصری و غیربصری پرداخته‌اند. نتیجه‌گیری: یافته‌ها نشان می‌دهد که اگرچه نقش پارامترهای معماری در سلامت شبانه‌روزی به‌خوبی مورد توجه قرار گرفته است، اما کمبود مطالعات با رویکرد یکپارچه آسایش بصری و غیربصری همچنان یکی از خلأهای اصلی این حوزه محسوب می‌شود. توسعه رویکرد طراحی روشنایی انسان‌محور (HCL) و توجه به ملاحظات شبانه‌روزی از مراحل اولیه طراحی می‌تواند به ارتقای کیفیت محیط‌های معماری و سلامت کاربران منجر شود. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| روشنایی شبانه روزی موثر؛ نورروز؛ اثرات غیر-بصری نور؛ سلامت؛ روشنایی یکپارچه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| A systematic literature review: The architectural design parameters affecting circadian health and non-visual daylight comfort | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Zahra Rostami Najafabadi1؛ Zahra Zamani2 | ||
| 1Master's student( energy and architecture), Faculty of architecture, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Assistant Professor, Department of Arch. Technology, College of Fine Art, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The variation of daylight during the day makes it an ideal source for stimulating the human circadian system; however, the quantity, quality, and appropriate hours of access to it are not always available in the interior space. Therefore, artificial light is necessary to complete human's visual and non-visual aspect of light. The factors of building design and interior design of the space have a great impact on the amount of incoming light and its quality, so it is necessary to review previous studies in this field and systematically categorize them. This review study compares the discussed parameters in this domain, dependent variables, approaches and evaluation criteria, emphasize the importance and impact of design parameters on human day-to-day health. Systematic study, the parameters discussed in this topic along with the amount of repetition in the articles include; human (11%), ideation factors (4%), geography and weather (8%), building (6%), window (31%), window glazing (6%), shading system (14%), interior surfaces (13%), artificial lighting system (2%) and furniture (5%). The most important dependent variables(measurement factors) in this topic are CS (47%), EML (25%), m-EDI (20%) and M/P (8%). The investigation of these studies has been selected in the latitude range of Iran so that, the obtained results can be applicable. The weak point in the previous studies is the lack of attention to the integrated lighting design process and the simultaneous consideration of visual and non-visual comfort; So that 74% of the articles, unilaterally, only addressed the issue of non-visual comfort and 26% of the articles addressed the integrated approach. It is worth mentioning; The articles in this current study have only dealt with non-visual comfort (unilaterally or integrated) and the visual approach (uniquely) has not been investigated. So, the lack of an integrated approach in the articles is the weak point of the conducted studies, because these parameters and their impact on the design should be considered from the early stages so that the plan reaches a right circadian rhythm. To meet this need, human-centered lighting (HCL) design approach, which places humans and their visual and non-visual needs should be included in the design. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Circadian-effective lighting, Daylight, Non-visual effects of light, Health, Integrative lighting | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Raeisi, Z.,Heidari, S. (2023). Circadian Effects of Daylight on the Typical Residential Architecture of Tehran Journal of Fine Arts [In Persian]. https://doi.org/10.22059/jfaup.2023.360120.672880 Acosta, I., et al. (2015). Analysis of circadian stimulus allowed by daylighting in hospital rooms. Lighting Res. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153515592948 Acostaa, I., et al. (2019). Daylighting design for healthy environments: Analysis of educational spaces for optimal circadian stimulus. solar energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.10.004 AGUILAR-CARRASCO, M. T., et al. (2021). Indoor lighting design for healthier workplaces: natural and electric light assessment for suitable circadian stimulus. optic express. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.430747 Alkhatatbeh, B.,Asadi, S. (2021). REVIEW Role of Architectural Design in Creating Circadian-Effective Interior Settings. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14206731 Bellia, L., et al. (2024). Light-environment interactions and integrative lighting design: Connecting visual, non-visual and energy requirements in a case study experiment. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111323 Bellia, L.,Fragliasso, F. (2021). REVIEW Good Places to Live and Sleep Well: A Literature Review about the Role of Architecture in Determining Non-Visual Effects of Light. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18031002 Bellia, L., et al. (2015). Indoor lighting quality: Effects of different wall colours. Lighting Res. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153515594654 Bianchi, E., et al. (2024). Effects of architectural interventions on psychological, cognitive, social, and pro-environmental aspects of occupant well-being: Results from an immersive online study Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111293 Bower, I., et al. (2019). Impact of built environment design on emotion measured via neurophysiological correlates and subjective indicators: A systematic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101344 Dai, Q., et al. (2018). Spatial and spectral illumination design for energy-efficient circadian lighting. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.10.004 Ezpeleta, S., et al. (2021). Analysis of Photopic and Melanopic Lighting in Teaching Environments. buildings. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11100439 Ghaeili Ardabili, N., et al. (2023). REVIEW A systematic literature review: Building window’s influence on indoor circadian health. Renewable and Sustainable Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.113796 Hammes, S., et al. (2024). Concepts of user-centred lighting controls for office applications: A systematic literature review. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111321 Heidari, B., et al. (2025). human centric lighting in office space day light strategies and environmental influence on visual effect and circadian health. buildings and environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2025.113538 Houser, K., et al. (2020). Human-centric lighting: Myth, magic or metaphor? Lighting Res. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153520958448 Kim, I. T., et al. (2017). Development of a Colour Quality Assessment Tool for indoor luminous environments affecting the circadian rhythm of occupants. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.10.009 Kolberga, E., et al. (2022). Insufficient melanopic equivalent daylight illuminance in nursing home dementia units across seasons and gaze directions. Lighting Res. Technol. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153521994539 Konis, K. (2017). A novel circadian daylight metric for building design and evaluation. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.025 Konis, K. (2018). Field evaluation of the circadian stimulus potential of daylit and non-daylit spaces in dementia care facilities. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.03.007 Lana, A.,Faris, A. (2023). The state-of-the-art knowledge, techniques, and simulation programs for quantifying human visual comfort in mosque buildings: A systematic review. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102128 Llorens-Ga´mez, M., et al. (2022). The impact of the design of learning spaces on attention and memory from a neuroarchitectural approach: A systematic review. ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2021.12.002 Luo, W., et al. (2023). Personal control of correlated color temperature of light: Effects on thermal comfort, visual comfort, and cognitive performance. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110380 Marín-Doñágueda, M., et al. (2021). Simultaneous optimization of circadian and color performance for smart lighting systems design. energy and building. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111456 Parsaee, M., et al. (2020). Human-centric lighting performance of shading panels in architecture: A benchmarking study with lab scale physical models under real skies. solar energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.04.088 Potočnik, J.,Košir, M. (2019). Influence of commercial glazing and wall colours on the resulting non-visual daylight conditions of an office. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2019.106627 Pradhan, S., et al. (2024). Investigating effects of indoor temperature and lighting on university students’ learning performance considering sensation, comfort, and physiological responses Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111346 Schledermann, K. M., et al. (2023). Evaluation of staff’s perception of a circadian lighting system implemented in a hospital. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110488 The WELL Building Standard. (2016). In. International WELL Institute. Wessolowski, N., et al. (2014). The effect of variable light on the fidgetiness and social behavior of pupils in school. Journal of Environmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.05.001 Xu, J., et al. (2025). The visual and non-visual effects of annual daylighting performance on middle school students: A longitudinal field survey of classrooms in Eastern China. Energy & Buildings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115364 Zeng, Y., et al. (2021). Non-visual effects of office light environment: Field evaluation, model comparison, and spectral analysis. Building and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107859 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 179 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 96 |
||