پیوندهای مفید
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 15 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 239 |
| تعداد مقالات | 2,443 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 4,175,042 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 3,046,824 |
هستیشناسی اشیای دیجیتال: تحلیلی پساپدیدارشناسانه از "وجود" در جهان مجازی | ||
| پژوهش های هستی شناختی | ||
| مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده، انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 31 اردیبهشت 1405 | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.22061/orj.2026.12390.906 | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| حمید احمدی هدایت* | ||
| عضو هیات علمی دانشگاه فرهنگیان | ||
| تاریخ دریافت: 23 مرداد 1404، تاریخ بازنگری: 24 آبان 1404، تاریخ پذیرش: 31 اردیبهشت 1405 | ||
| چکیده | ||
| گسترش روزافزون اشیای دیجیتال (نمایههای اجتماعی، ارزهای دیجیتال و چهرکها) چارچوبهای هستیشناختی سنتی مبتنی بر جوهر فیزیکی را به چالش کشیده است. رویکردهای موجود اغلب به فروکاهش هستیشناختی دچار شده و این اشیاء را به بستر فیزیکی (سختافزار) یا مفهوم انتزاعی (اطلاعات) تقلیل میدهند و در نتیجه، از ارائه مبنایی برای تحلیل پیامدهای انضمامی آنها در حوزههای حقوقی و اخلاقی باز میمانند. این پژوهش با هدف رفع این کاستی و با بهرهگیری از روششناسی پساپدیدارشناسانه، به دنبال ارائه یک هستیشناسی رابطهای و چندپایدار برای فهم نحوه وجود اشیای دیجیتال است. یافتهها نشان میدهد «هستی» یک شیء دیجیتال، امری ذاتی و ثابت نیست، بلکه به صورت پویا در سه نسبت اصلی بدنمندی (امتداد خود)، هرمنوتیک (متن قابل تفسیر) و غیریت (شبهدیگری) و بسته به زمینه تعامل انسان-فناوری شکل میگیرد. دستاورد نهایی این پژوهش، ارائه چارچوبی است که با عبور از دوگانه سادهانگارانه واقعی/مجازی، مبنای فلسفی دقیقتری برای پرداختن به مسائل نوظهوری چون هویت مجازی، مالکیت دیجیتال و عاملیت اخلاقی هوش مصنوعی فراهم میآورد و پرسش را از «چیستی» شیء به «چگونگی تجربه شدن» آن سوق میدهد. | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| هستیشناسی؛ اشیاء دیجیتال؛ پساپدیدارشناسی؛ واسطهگری فناوری؛ واقعیت مجازی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Ontology of Digital Objects: A Postphenomenological Analysis of "Being" in the Virtual World | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Hamid Ahmadi-Hedayat | ||
| faculty member of farhangian university | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| The proliferation of digital objects—such as social profiles, cryptocurrencies, and avatars—challenges traditional ontological frameworks premised on physical substance. Existing approaches often commit a form of ontological reductionism, reducing these objects to either their physical substrate (hardware) or an abstract concept (information). Consequently, they fail to provide a robust foundation for analyzing the concrete legal and ethical implications of these entities. To address this deficit, this study employs a postphenomenological methodology to propose a relational and multistable ontology for understanding the mode of being of digital objects. The findings reveal that the being of a digital object is not intrinsic or static. Instead, it is dynamically constituted through three primary relations, contingent upon the context of human-technology interaction: an embodiment relation (as an extension of the self), a hermeneutic relation (as an interpretable text), and an alterity relation (as a quasi-other). The primary contribution of this research is a framework that transcends the simplistic real/virtual dichotomy. It provides a more precise philosophical foundation for addressing emerging issues such as virtual identity, digital ownership, and the moral agency of artificial intelligence, ultimately shifting the inquiry from what a digital object is to how it is experienced. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Ontology, Digital Objects, Postphenomenology, Technological Mediation, Virtual Reality | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Ahmadi-Hedayat, H. , Nosrati Hashi, K. and Ghobadian, M. (2023). Explaining Relationships based on Technology in Post-Phenomenology and its Consequences in Education. Journal of Ontological Researches, 12(23), 192-165. doi: 10.22061/orj.2023.1906. Persian
Aagaard, J. (2016). Introducing postphenomenological research: a brief and selective sketch of phenomenological research methods. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30(6), 519–533. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2016.1263884
Adams, C., & Gourlay, L. (2024). Exploring Digital Lifeworlds: Doing Postphenomenology in Networked Learning Research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Networked Learning , 14(1). https://doi.org/10.54337/nlc.v14i1.8182
Bogost, I. (2012). Alien Phenomenology, or What It's Like to Be a Thing. University of Minnesota Press.
Borgmann, A. (1984). Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life: A Philosophical Inquiry. University of Chicago Press.
Chalmers, D. J. (2017). The Virtual and the Real. In H. W. Haladjian & D. G. G. de Souza (Eds.), Philosophy of Virtual and Augmented Reality. Routledge.
De Boer, B. (2023). Explaining multistability: postphenomenology and affordances of technologies. AI & society, 38(6), 2267-2277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01272-3
Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). What Computers Still Can't Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. MIT Press.
Floridi, L. (2011). The Philosophy of Information. Oxford University Press.
Floridi, L. (2014). The 4th Revolution: How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality. Oxford University Press.
Hardley, J. (2021). Embodied Perceptions of Darkness: Multistable Experiences of Mobile Media in the Urban Night. M/C Journal, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.5204/mcj.2756 (Original work published April 26, 2021)
Harman, G. (2018). Object-Oriented Ontology: A New Theory of Everything. Pelican Books.
Heidegger, M. (1977). The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays (W. Lovitt, Trans.). Garland Publishing.
Heim, M. (1993). The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality. Oxford University Press.
Ihde, D. (1990). Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth. Indiana University Press.
Ihde, D. (2009). Postphenomenology and Technoscience: The Peking University Lectures. State University of New York Press.
Introna, L. D., & Ilharco, F. M. (2004). A hermeneutic of the technics: in search of a Heideggerian and a Levinasian approach to information systems. In The social study of information and communication technology (pp. 257-285). Oxford University Press.
Moens, B. G. (2018). Aesthetic Experience in Virtual Museums: A Postphenomenological Perspective. Studies in Digital Heritage, 2(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.14434/sdh.v2i1.24468
Pavanini, M. (2022). Multistability and Derrida’s différance: Investigating the relations between postphenomenology and Stiegler’s general organology. Philosophy & Technology, 35(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00501-x
Ritter, M. (2021). Philosophical potencies of postphenomenology. Philosophy & technology, 34(4), 1501-1516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00469-0
Rosenberger, R. (2020). " But, That's Not Phenomenology!": A Phenomenology of Discriminatory Technologies. Techné: Research in Philosophy & Technology, 24.
Rosenberger, R. (2021). Technological multistability and the trouble with the things themselves. in Shannon Vallor (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Technology (2022; online edn, Oxford Academic, 10 Nov. 2020), https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190851187.013.42, accessed 13 Aug. 2025.
Rosenberger, R., & Verbeek, P. P. (Eds.). (2015). Postphenomenological Investigations: Essays on Human-Technology Relations. Lexington Books.
Sugawara, S. (2023). The multistability of predictive technology in nuclear disasters. Social Studies of Science, 53(4), 495-521. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127231161609 (Original work published 2023)
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books.
Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design. Penn State University Press.
Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Moralizing Technology: Understanding and Designing the Morality of Things. University of Chicago Press.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.
Zwier, J., Blok, V., & Lemmens, P. (2016). Phenomenology and the empirical turn: A phenomenological analysis of postphenomenology. Philosophy & Technology, 29(4), 313-333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0221-7 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 120 |
||